Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Texray AB currently has 2 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. Both of these actions are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a unified technical focus for the company's pending intellectual property. The prosecution is split between 2 distinct examiners. This arrangement means that while the technology is consistent enough to stay in 1 art unit, the company must still navigate the individual perspectives of multiple examiners.
ALINA ROSE KALISZEWSKI is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners handling the 2 pending actions, the company is receiving feedback from multiple perspectives within the same art unit. This requires the applicant to address the specific requirements of two different examiners for their related technologies. Practitioners should monitor both cases closely, as the 2 distinct examiners may apply the art unit's standards in slightly different ways.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE | 1 | 84.4% | +23.8% |
| LOGIE, MICHAEL J | 1 | 63.4% | +9.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18064850 | RADIATION SHIELD DEVICE | LOGIE, MICHAEL J | 1d overdue |
| 18840173 | A RADIATION PROTECTION SHIELDING SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR COVERING A PATIENT | KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18840173 | A RADIATION PROTECTION SHIELDING SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR COVERING A PATIENT | KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2881 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18840173 | A RADIATION PROTECTION SHIELDING SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR COVERING A PATIENT | KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 21, 2024 |
| 18064850 | RADIATION SHIELD DEVICE | LOGIE, MICHAEL J | 2881 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 1d overdue | Pending | Dec 12, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial