Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

The Jackson Laboratory

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

16 pending office actions • 12 art units • 16 examiners • 0 of 16 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The Jackson Laboratory currently manages 16 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These matters are assigned to 16 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is responsible for a single case. The prosecution activity is widely distributed across 12 distinct art units, indicating a range of technical research and development.

HICKS, SHIRLEY D. is identified as the busiest examiner for the laboratory, currently handling 1 pending office action. Because 16 distinct examiners are each managing a case, the laboratory's legal team must coordinate with a large number of individuals across the patent office. The 12 distinct art units involved suggest that the portfolio covers many different specialized areas within biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. This level of distribution across both examiners and art units requires a highly organized approach to manage the 16 pending office actions effectively.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

16
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (62%)
6
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (19%)
§103 only3 (19%)
§102 only1 (6%)
Double-patenting + other2 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (44%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

8
Life Sciences
50% of docket
1
Information Tech
6% of docket
1
Communications
6% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
12% of docket
4
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

160 h
Manual time on pending OAs
32 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
56 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HICKS, SHIRLEY D. 1 60.8% +50.5%
LEONARD, ARTHUR S 1 50.8% +50.2%
FISHBACK, ASHLEY LAUREN 1 80.1% +21.9%
BARRON, SEAN C 1 52.9% +30.9%
PENG, BO JOSEPH 1 69.5% +13.6%
PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA 1 77.8% +15.0%
JOHANNSEN, DIANA B 1 53.2% +42.8%
BRETZ, COREY LANE 1 0.0% +0.0%
BAUSCH, SARAE L 1 29.8% +44.7%
POHNERT, STEVEN C 1 12.4% +18.5%

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18015043 TRANSGENIC MOUSE MODEL EXPRESSING HUMAN HLA-A201 RESTRICTION GENE WILSON, MICHAEL C 25d overdue
17275653 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS IN A GENOME ROSSI, VY BUI 4d overdue
17813561 METHOD OF SELECTING A TREATMENT FOR AN MS PATIENT HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN 72d
18865074 IMPLANTABLE DATA LOGGER ANCHORING DEVICES FISHBACK, ASHLEY LAUREN —
18723361 HUMANIZED MOUSE MODELS BARRON, SEAN C —
18563207 RADIOSENSITIZING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS PENG, BO JOSEPH —
18280198 MULTIPLEX RNA TARGETING JOHANNSEN, DIANA B —
18454192 TARGETED DNA DEMETHYLATION AND METHYLATION BRETZ, COREY LANE —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18560081 Determining Visual Frailty Index Using Machine Learning Models PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA 30d overdue
18874860 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING CROSS-SPECIES GENE AND GENE VARIANT RELATIONSHIPS HICKS, SHIRLEY D. 12d
18972072 HUMANIZED MOUSE MODELS FOR ASSESSING IMMUNE CELL THERAPY LEONARD, ARTHUR S —
18865074 IMPLANTABLE DATA LOGGER ANCHORING DEVICES FISHBACK, ASHLEY LAUREN —
18723361 HUMANIZED MOUSE MODELS BARRON, SEAN C —
18563207 RADIOSENSITIZING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS PENG, BO JOSEPH —
18280198 MULTIPLEX RNA TARGETING JOHANNSEN, DIANA B —
18001841 Small Deletion Signatures BAUSCH, SARAE L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2168 1
2669 1
1682 1
1635 1
1699 1
1683 1
1632 1
3797 1
1631 1
1638 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18874860 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING CROSS-SPECIES GENE AND GENE VARIANT RELATIONSHIPS HICKS, SHIRLEY D. 2168 §102 Final Rejection 12d Pending Dec 13, 2024
18972072 HUMANIZED MOUSE MODELS FOR ASSESSING IMMUNE CELL THERAPY LEONARD, ARTHUR S — §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18865074 IMPLANTABLE DATA LOGGER ANCHORING DEVICES FISHBACK, ASHLEY LAUREN — §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18723361 HUMANIZED MOUSE MODELS BARRON, SEAN C — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2024
18563207 RADIOSENSITIZING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS PENG, BO JOSEPH — §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 21, 2023
18560081 Determining Visual Frailty Index Using Machine Learning Models PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA 2669 §103 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Nov 09, 2023
18280198 MULTIPLEX RNA TARGETING JOHANNSEN, DIANA B 1682 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 01, 2023
18454192 TARGETED DNA DEMETHYLATION AND METHYLATION BRETZ, COREY LANE 1635 §103DPOther Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 23, 2023
18001841 Small Deletion Signatures BAUSCH, SARAE L 1699 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 24, 2023
18272260 PROGNOSTIC METHODS FOR PLATINUM-BASED CHEMOTHERAPEUTICS POHNERT, STEVEN C 1683 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 13, 2023
18265521 INFECTIOUS DISEASE MOUSE MODELS SINGH, ANOOP KUMAR 1632 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 06, 2023
18007429 Automated Phenotyping of Behavior MOHAMMED, SHAHDEEP 3797 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Jan 30, 2023
18015042 TRANSGENIC MOUSE MODELS SUPPORTING HUMAN INNATE IMMUNE FUNCTION BATES, KEENAN ALEXANDER 1631 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 06, 2023
18015043 TRANSGENIC MOUSE MODEL EXPRESSING HUMAN HLA-A201 RESTRICTION GENE WILSON, MICHAEL C 1638 §103§112 Final Rejection 25d overdue Pending Jan 06, 2023
17813561 METHOD OF SELECTING A TREATMENT FOR AN MS PATIENT HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN 3791 §102§112 Final Rejection 72d Pending Jul 19, 2022
17275653 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS IN A GENOME ROSSI, VY BUI 1685 §101§103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Mar 11, 2021

Managing The Jackson Laboratory's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month