Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Treemagineers Ltd.

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (50%)
2
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
§112 only2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER 1 61.5% +21.9%
MATTEI, BRIAN DAVID 1 67.4% +15.3%
WOOD, KIMBERLY T 1 54.5% +27.2%
SHEPHERD, MATTHEW RICHARD 1 52.7% +39.1%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17796614 LANYARD ASSEMBLY MATTEI, BRIAN DAVID 35d overdue
17628270 HARNESSES WOOD, KIMBERLY T 30d overdue
18571156 HARNESSES HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER 23d overdue
15248513 HARNESSES SHEPHERD, MATTHEW RICHARD 8d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3636 1
3635 1
3631 1
3634 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18571156 HARNESSES HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER 3636 §112 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Dec 15, 2023
17796614 LANYARD ASSEMBLY MATTEI, BRIAN DAVID 3635 §103 Final Rejection 35d overdue Pending Jul 29, 2022
17628270 HARNESSES WOOD, KIMBERLY T 3631 §103 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Jan 19, 2022
15248513 HARNESSES SHEPHERD, MATTHEW RICHARD 3634 §112 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Aug 26, 2016

Managing Treemagineers Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month