Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Trimble Inc.

7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 32 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (14%)
6
Medium (86%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§103 only6 (86%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
29% of docket
1
Communications
14% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
57% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SPIELER, WILLIAM 1 73.9% +9.7%
SOROWAR, GOLAM 1 81.3% +17.8%
GUYAH, REMASH RAJA 1 76.3% +34.8%
HANN, JAY B 1 60.8% +34.1%
GALT, CASSI J 1 68.9% +16.1%
MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA 1 71.4% +30.1%
THATCHER, CLINT A 1 80.6% +10.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18584885 RESOLUTION AGNOSTIC GATE DETECTION METHOD USING TEMPORALLY-SPACED GPS PINGS SOROWAR, GOLAM 30d overdue
17897042 SENSOR CALIBRATION AND LOCALIZATION USING KNOWN OBJECT IDENTIFICATION THATCHER, CLINT A 70d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18770571 DEEP SEARCH BASED ON COMPONENTS OF 3-D MODELS SPIELER, WILLIAM 29d

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18584885 RESOLUTION AGNOSTIC GATE DETECTION METHOD USING TEMPORALLY-SPACED GPS PINGS SOROWAR, GOLAM 30d overdue
17899399 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ESTIMATING AN EXPECTED ACCURACY USING NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM OBSERVATIONS MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA 1d overdue
18202820 IONOSPHERIC DISTURBANCE MITIGATION METHODS AND SYSTEMS GUYAH, REMASH RAJA 21d
17979617 ROVER POSITION COMPUTATION USING SAFE DATA GALT, CASSI J 36d
17897042 SENSOR CALIBRATION AND LOCALIZATION USING KNOWN OBJECT IDENTIFICATION THATCHER, CLINT A 70d
17981377 CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT USING ROBOTIC MARKING AND AUGMENTED REALITY METADATA OVERLAYS HANN, JAY B 79d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3648 3
2159 1
2641 1
2186 1
3645 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18770571 DEEP SEARCH BASED ON COMPONENTS OF 3-D MODELS SPIELER, WILLIAM 2159 §101 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Jul 11, 2024
18584885 RESOLUTION AGNOSTIC GATE DETECTION METHOD USING TEMPORALLY-SPACED GPS PINGS SOROWAR, GOLAM 2641 §103 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Feb 22, 2024
18202820 IONOSPHERIC DISTURBANCE MITIGATION METHODS AND SYSTEMS GUYAH, REMASH RAJA 3648 §103 Non-Final OA 21d Pending May 26, 2023
17981377 CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT USING ROBOTIC MARKING AND AUGMENTED REALITY METADATA OVERLAYS HANN, JAY B 2186 §103 Non-Final OA 79d Pending Nov 04, 2022
17979617 ROVER POSITION COMPUTATION USING SAFE DATA GALT, CASSI J 3648 §103 Non-Final OA 36d Pending Nov 02, 2022
17899399 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ESTIMATING AN EXPECTED ACCURACY USING NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM OBSERVATIONS MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA 3648 §103 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Aug 30, 2022
17897042 SENSOR CALIBRATION AND LOCALIZATION USING KNOWN OBJECT IDENTIFICATION THATCHER, CLINT A 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 70d Pending Aug 26, 2022

Managing Trimble Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month