6 pending office actions • 3 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (17%) |
| §103 only | 1 (17%) |
| §102 only | 2 (33%) |
| §112 only | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHAM, KHAI QUYNH TIEN | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
| GIAMMONA, FRANCESCA FILIPPA | 1 | 37.0% | +55.9% |
| BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE | 1 | 63.5% | +39.8% |
| LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE | 1 | 59.6% | +45.2% |
| FLINDERS, JEREMY C | 1 | 63.9% | +16.4% |
| GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M | 1 | 63.4% | +40.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17715890 | LIBRARIES FOR MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS | FLINDERS, JEREMY C | 85d overdue |
| 18066953 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF VARIANTS | GIAMMONA, FRANCESCA FILIPPA | 7d |
| 18168528 | COMBINATORIAL DNA ASSEMBLY FOR MULTISPECIFIC ANTIBODIES | PHAM, KHAI QUYNH TIEN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18056648 | CYTOKINE VARIANT ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE | BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE | 113d overdue |
| 17715890 | LIBRARIES FOR MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS | FLINDERS, JEREMY C | 85d overdue |
| 17721680 | BARCODE-BASED NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE ASSEMBLY | LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE | 49d overdue |
| 18066953 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF VARIANTS | GIAMMONA, FRANCESCA FILIPPA | 7d |
| 17702643 | VARIANT NUCLEIC ACID LIBRARIES FOR TIGIT | GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1684 | 4 |
| 1681 | 1 |
| 1643 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18168528 | COMBINATORIAL DNA ASSEMBLY FOR MULTISPECIFIC ANTIBODIES | PHAM, KHAI QUYNH TIEN | 1684 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 13, 2023 |
| 18066953 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF VARIANTS | GIAMMONA, FRANCESCA FILIPPA | 1681 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 7d | Pending | Dec 15, 2022 |
| 18056648 | CYTOKINE VARIANT ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE | BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE | 1643 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 113d overdue | Pending | Nov 17, 2022 |
| 17721680 | BARCODE-BASED NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE ASSEMBLY | LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE | 1684 | §102 | Final Rejection | 49d overdue | Pending | Apr 15, 2022 |
| 17715890 | LIBRARIES FOR MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS | FLINDERS, JEREMY C | 1684 | §101 | Final Rejection | 85d overdue | Pending | Apr 07, 2022 |
| 17702643 | VARIANT NUCLEIC ACID LIBRARIES FOR TIGIT | GROSS, CHRISTOPHER M | 1684 | §102 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 23, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial