Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Vidar Last Holding BV

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Vidar Last Holding BV has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This specific matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. The concentrated nature of this portfolio means prosecution strategy is currently focused on a single point of contact at the patent office. This centralization minimizes the complexity often found in larger portfolios where multiple examiners might issue conflicting requirements.

TANENBAUM, TZVI SAMUEL is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 pending action in total, this examiner manages the entirety of the company's current active prosecution. This streamlined oversight allows for a highly specific focus on the requirements of the assigned department. Practitioners can dedicate their efforts to the specific preferences of a unique examiner without the need to coordinate across different personnel.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TANENBAUM, TZVI SAMUEL 1 68.4% +9.6%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3763 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18706197 HEATING OR COOLING ELEMENT TANENBAUM, TZVI SAMUEL 3763 §102 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Apr 30, 2024

Managing Vidar Last Holding BV's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month