Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Woodstream Corporation

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (25%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
No statute on record1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
25% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BALSECA, FRANKLIN D 1 60.2% +30.7%
JORDAN, MORGAN T 1 53.2% +33.5%
CLERKLEY, DANIELLE A 1 51.8% +46.9%
ARK, DARREN W 1 56.1% +64.4%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17323416 Remote Monitoring Of Live Catch Rodent Traps ARK, DARREN W 12d
19264129 Connected Bait Box BALSECA, FRANKLIN D 26d
19185452 Insect Trap Receptacle JORDAN, MORGAN T 72d
18934533 SNAP TRAP WITH SET-PREVENT INTERFERENCE MEMBER AND RODENT ORIENTING SIDE WALLS CLERKLEY, DANIELLE A 75d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3643 2
2688 1
3647 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19264129 Connected Bait Box BALSECA, FRANKLIN D 2688 Other Non-Final OA 26d Pending Jul 09, 2025
19185452 Insect Trap Receptacle JORDAN, MORGAN T 3643 DPOther Non-Final OA 72d Pending Apr 22, 2025
18934533 SNAP TRAP WITH SET-PREVENT INTERFERENCE MEMBER AND RODENT ORIENTING SIDE WALLS CLERKLEY, DANIELLE A 3643 §103 Non-Final OA 75d Pending Nov 01, 2024
17323416 Remote Monitoring Of Live Catch Rodent Traps ARK, DARREN W 3647 §103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending May 18, 2021

Managing Woodstream Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month