Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Xingmai Innovation Technology (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Xingmai Innovation Technology (Suzhou) Co. Ltd. currently has 5 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that every one of the 5 pending office actions is being reviewed by a different examiner in a different administrative group. This level of dispersion means that the company is navigating 5 different sets of examiner preferences and art unit practices simultaneously within the Chemistry & Materials field.

SAENZ, ALBERTO is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Given that there are 5 pending office actions and 5 distinct examiners, the workload is evenly spread across the assigned staff. No single examiner handles more than 1 of the 5 pending office actions. This structure requires the company to manage 5 separate prosecution tracks without the benefit of examiner level consolidation. The involvement of 5 distinct art units further emphasizes the technical variety of the matters currently under review.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
3
Medium (60%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
Double-patenting only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SAENZ, ALBERTO 1 69.1% +30.6%
GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN 1 33.3% +4.9%
STRYKER, NICHOLAS F 1 34.7% +22.7%
TRAN, SARAH ASHLEY 1 68.8% +20.3%
PRINCE JR, FREDDIE GARY 1 79.0% +20.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19452117 POOL ROBOT SAENZ, ALBERTO —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19342629 POOL ROBOT CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND POOL ROBOT STRYKER, NICHOLAS F 31d overdue
19452117 POOL ROBOT SAENZ, ALBERTO —
19079095 CONTROL METHOD FOR CLEANING DEVICE, AND CLEANING DEVICE TRAN, SARAH ASHLEY —
18614596 DEVICES FOR IN-WATER AUTOMATIC SPREADING PRINCE JR, FREDDIE GARY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3723 1
1777 1
3665 1
3656 1
1779 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19452117 POOL ROBOT SAENZ, ALBERTO 3723 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 16, 2026
19349993 SWIMMING POOL ROBOT GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN 1777 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Oct 04, 2025
19342629 POOL ROBOT CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND POOL ROBOT STRYKER, NICHOLAS F 3665 §103 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Sep 28, 2025
19079095 CONTROL METHOD FOR CLEANING DEVICE, AND CLEANING DEVICE TRAN, SARAH ASHLEY 3656 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 13, 2025
18614596 DEVICES FOR IN-WATER AUTOMATIC SPREADING PRINCE JR, FREDDIE GARY 1779 DP Final Rejection — Pending Mar 22, 2024

Managing Xingmai Innovation Technology (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month