Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Young Chang Chemical Co. Ltd. operates a company patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio currently has 3 pending office actions, which suggests a broader range of active prosecution than smaller portfolios in the same sector. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners, showing that the company is interacting with multiple points of review within the patent office simultaneously.
The work is further spread across 3 distinct art units. This variety in art units indicates that the Chemistry & Materials innovations being pursued may span different technical subclasses or specialized examination groups. LEE, ALEXANDER N is the busiest examiner associated with the portfolio. This examiner is currently handling 1 pending office action, which is a portion of the total actions pending for the company.
The fact that the busiest examiner pending count is 1 confirms that no single examiner dominates the current workload. Instead, the prosecution is split among the distinct examiners. This distribution can provide the company with diverse perspectives from different officials within the USPTO's Chemistry & Materials divisions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, ALEXANDER N | 1 | 76.7% | +11.9% |
| LAOBAK, ANDREW KEELAN | 1 | 75.4% | +34.5% |
| KUMAR, PREETI | 1 | 31.9% | +43.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17641229 | PROCESS LIQUID COMPOSITION FOR PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY AND PATTERN FORMING METHOD USING SAME | KUMAR, PREETI | 72d overdue |
| 18040167 | PROCESS SOLUTION COMPOSITION FOR EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY AND PATTERN FORMING METHOD USING SAME | LEE, ALEXANDER N | — |
| 18016725 | ETCHANT COMPOSITION FOR ADJUSTING ETCHING SELECTIVITY OF TITANIUM NITRIDE FILM WITH RESPECT TO TUNGSTEN FILM, AND ETCHING METHOD USING SAME | LAOBAK, ANDREW KEELAN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1737 | 1 |
| 1713 | 1 |
| 1761 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18040167 | PROCESS SOLUTION COMPOSITION FOR EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY AND PATTERN FORMING METHOD USING SAME | LEE, ALEXANDER N | 1737 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 01, 2023 |
| 18016725 | ETCHANT COMPOSITION FOR ADJUSTING ETCHING SELECTIVITY OF TITANIUM NITRIDE FILM WITH RESPECT TO TUNGSTEN FILM, AND ETCHING METHOD USING SAME | LAOBAK, ANDREW KEELAN | 1713 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2023 |
| 17641229 | PROCESS LIQUID COMPOSITION FOR PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY AND PATTERN FORMING METHOD USING SAME | KUMAR, PREETI | 1761 | §103 | Final Rejection | 72d overdue | Pending | Mar 08, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial