Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

ZF Wind Power Antwerpen N V

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

ZF Wind Power Antwerpen N V currently manages 5 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are assigned to 4 distinct examiners. This distribution shows that while most of the 5 pending actions are handled by different individuals, one examiner is responsible for multiple cases. This distribution suggests that the company's mechanical systems innovations are being reviewed by a broad group of examiners, each bringing their own perspective to the prosecution process.

The company's prosecution is concentrated in 2 distinct art units. With 5 pending office actions, this high level of concentration in 2 units suggests that the company's mechanical systems innovations are reviewed by a very narrow group of specialized examiners. This focus within 2 art units can lead to a more consistent examination experience. The ratio of 5 actions to 2 art units indicates that the company's technology is technically concentrated, allowing for a more specialized and potentially consistent dialogue with the patent office within those specific groups.

DEREK DOUGLAS KNIGHT is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 2 pending office actions. This workload of 2 actions is the highest among the 4 distinct examiners. The management of 5 pending actions across 2 art units reflects the company's focused engagement with the patent office. This structure requires the company to maintain a strategic approach to prosecution across a small number of specialized art units while managing its active applications across a diverse group of examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
§102 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KNIGHT, DEREK DOUGLAS 2 85.1% +3.0%
SEABE, JUSTIN D 1 71.7% +24.3%
PERVIN, FARHANA 1 81.4% +7.1%
RIBADENEYRA, THEODORE C 1 89.2% +9.2%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18832993 ARRANGEMENT COMPRISING PLANETARY STAGES AND A SPLINE KNIGHT, DEREK DOUGLAS 4d overdue
19128566 GEAR OR SHAFT COMPRISING A MASS DAMPER PERVIN, FARHANA —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19422501 MOUNTING SYSTEM, WIND TURBINE, AND METHOD FOR REMOVING A BEARING SEABE, JUSTIN D —
19354883 BEARING ARRANGEMENT AND GEARBOX KNIGHT, DEREK DOUGLAS —
19121828 WIND TURBINE GEARBOX CONNECTING STRUCTURE AND GEARBOX RIBADENEYRA, THEODORE C —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19422501 MOUNTING SYSTEM, WIND TURBINE, AND METHOD FOR REMOVING A BEARING SEABE, JUSTIN D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3655 3
3745 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19422501 MOUNTING SYSTEM, WIND TURBINE, AND METHOD FOR REMOVING A BEARING SEABE, JUSTIN D 3745 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2025
19354883 BEARING ARRANGEMENT AND GEARBOX KNIGHT, DEREK DOUGLAS 3655 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 10, 2025
19128566 GEAR OR SHAFT COMPRISING A MASS DAMPER PERVIN, FARHANA 3655 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2025
19121828 WIND TURBINE GEARBOX CONNECTING STRUCTURE AND GEARBOX RIBADENEYRA, THEODORE C 3745 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 17, 2025
18832993 ARRANGEMENT COMPRISING PLANETARY STAGES AND A SPLINE KNIGHT, DEREK DOUGLAS 3655 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Jul 25, 2024

Managing ZF Wind Power Antwerpen N V's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month