Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Examiner: BECK, KAREN

Tech Center 3600 • Art Units: 3614 3616 3676

This examiner grants 83% of resolved cases

Analysis

Karen Beck examines applications in Art Unit 3614 within Tech Center 3600. She has reached a final resolution in 792 cases, establishing a robust historical record for analysis. The allowance rate pct of 82.6 is high, indicating that the vast majority of applications in this portfolio result in a patent grant. This 82.6 percent rate suggests a very favorable environment for applicants seeking to secure intellectual property rights. The median days to allowance is 860, which reflects a relatively efficient and fast-moving prosecution timeline compared to many other units. The 860-day median indicates that successful applicants can expect a quicker path to grant in Tech Center 3600. The volume of 792 resolved cases provides high confidence in these metrics.

The data also shows an interview lift pct of 10.5, which indicates that direct communication is a beneficial strategy. This positive lift suggests that applications involving an interview have a higher probability of allowance than those without verbal negotiation. For practitioners, the 10.5 percent lift provides a tactical option to further improve the already strong 82.6 percent baseline success rate. Engaging in an interview can help resolve any remaining technical issues and potentially streamline the 860-day median wait time. With 792 resolved cases, these metrics offer a clear view of the examiner's tendencies in Art Unit 3614. The combination of a high grant rate and a positive interview lift makes this a relatively collaborative environment for prosecution. Strategic use of interviews is recommended to maximize the chances of a favorable outcome.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

82.6%
Allow Rate
+30.6% vs TC avg
806
Total Applications
+10.5%
Interview Lift
860
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 792 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0.8%
§101 Eligibility
32.4%
§102 Novelty
46.8%
§103 Obviousness
17.6%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18517013 AIRBAG MODULE, VEHICLE SEAT HAVING AN AIRBAG MODULE, AND VEHICLE Non-Final OA ZF AUTOMOTIVE GERMANY GMBH
18822282 VEHICLE FRONT PORTION STRUCTURE Final Rejection AISIN CORPORATION
19134093 VEHICLE OCCUPANT PROTECTION DEVICE Non-Final OA AUTOLIV DEVELOPMENT AB
18867048 Component Connection for a Body of a Motor Vehicle, and Method for Producing the Component Connection Final Rejection Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
18715158 Vehicle Having a Storage Compartment Final Rejection Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
18999557 AXIAL PLUNGING HALF-SHAFT ASSEMBLY Non-Final OA Textron Inc.
18610701 HYDRAULIC SUSPENSION APPARATUS AND HYDRAULIC SUSPENSION SYSTEM AND VEHICLE HAVING SAME Non-Final OA BYD COMPANY LIMITED
18742850 INDEPENDENT STEERING DEVICE HAVING A LINEAR ACTUATOR AND A VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME Non-Final OA SEOHAN INNOBILITY CO., LTD.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month