Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Jacinta M Crawford, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as CRAWFORD, JACINTA M

Tech Center 2600 • Art Units: 2612 2617 2618 2628 2677

This examiner grants 88% of resolved cases

Analysis

CRAWFORD, JACINTA M is assigned to USPTO Technology Center 2600 and art unit 2612. The profile covers 834 resolved cases, with an 88.0% allowance rate and a 9.7% interview lift. The median time to allowance is 900 days. The high allowance figure is accompanied by a positive but modest interview association, supporting careful use of interviews within an otherwise focused prosecution plan.

The leading companies are Imagination Technologies Limited, Apple Inc., and Intel Corporation. The leading firms are Ahmann Kloke LLP, Barta Jones, PLLC, and BRAKE HUGHES BELLERMANN LLP. Applicants can use these recurring participants to identify comparable technology portfolios and counsel experience.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

88.0%
Allow Rate
+26.0% vs TC avg
867
Total Applications
+9.7%
Interview Lift
900
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 834 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

8.5%
§101 Eligibility
4.8%
§102 Novelty
58.0%
§103 Obviousness
16.7%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18899747 TEXT INFORMATION GENERATION DEVICE, TEXT INFORMATION GENERATION METHOD, PROGRAM, AND RECORDING MEDIUM Final Rejection FUJIFILM Corporation
18827221 Generating Virtual Representations Using Media Assets Final Rejection Apple Inc.
18760288 VISUAL TECHNIQUES FOR 3D CONTENT Final Rejection Apple Inc.
18660176 PROVIDING ACCESS TO MESH GEOMETRY FROM IMAGES OF OBJECTS Non-Final OA GOOGLE LLC
18938546 DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE, DISPLAY METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM Non-Final OA TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18862578 METHOD TO RENDER SOFT TISSUE INTO X-RAY MODALITIES Non-Final OA KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
19087823 DYNAMIC ROUTING OF TEXTURE LOADS IN GRAPHICS PROCESSING Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
18971949 COMPUTE OPTIMIZATION MECHANISM FOR DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
18791963 GRAPHICS PROCESSOR OPERATION SCHEDULING FOR DETERMINISTIC LATENCY Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
18460044 TUNING CONFIGURATION PARAMETERS FOR GRAPHICS PIPELINE FOR BETTER USER EXPERENCE Non-Final OA Intel Corporation
18860769 AN AUGMENTED REALITY BASED AUTOMATION SYSTEM WITH TASK MANAGER Non-Final OA BASF SE
19076717 SHADOW RENDERING METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM Non-Final OA Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
18937935 DYNAMIC CREATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SPATIAL ANCHORS Non-Final OA Nokia Technologies Oy
18510206 APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE TO PERFORM TENSOR OPERATIONS Final Rejection NVIDIA Corporation
19197768 Data Structures, Methods and Primitive Block Generators for Storing Primitives in a Graphics Processing System Non-Final OA Imagination Technologies Limited
19181443 Multicore Master/Slave Communications Non-Final OA Imagination Technologies Limited
19090105 Methods and Hardware Logic for Writing Ray Tracing Data From a Shader Processing Unit of a Graphics Processing Unit Non-Final OA Imagination Technologies Limited
19031852 Data Structures, Methods and Tiling Engines for Storing Tiling Information in a Graphics Processing System Non-Final OA Imagination Technologies Limited
19017672 Graphics Processor with Non-Blocking Concurrent Architecture Non-Final OA Imagination Technologies Limited
18211725 Foveated Rendering Final Rejection Imagination Technologies Limited
19197684 DYNAMIC DISPATCH FOR WORKGROUP DISTRIBUTION Non-Final OA ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Jacinta M Crawford's allowance rate?

88.0% of resolved applications examined by Jacinta M Crawford were allowed (834 resolved cases), compared with 70.3% across Art Unit 2612 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Jacinta M Crawford?

This examiner's interview lift is +9.7 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Jacinta M Crawford take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Jacinta M Crawford took 900 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Jacinta M Crawford work in?

Jacinta M Crawford examines applications in Art Unit 2612 in Tech Center 2600 (Communications).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month