Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Travis M Figg, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as FIGG, TRAVIS M

Tech Center 3600 • Art Units: 1633 1783 1784 3651

This examiner grants 61% of resolved cases

Analysis

FIGG, TRAVIS M has 427 resolved cases in Tech Center 3600 and art unit 1633. The allowance rate is 61.4%, the interview lift is 17.2%, and the median time to allowance is 1116 days. The figures indicate a moderate allowance outcome, a meaningful resolved-case record, and an interview effect that can support but not replace written prosecution work.

The listed companies are Corning Incorporated, LG Display Co., Ltd., and Samsung Display Co., Ltd. The listed firms are BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP, Blank Rome LLP - Houston General, and Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC. Practitioners should use the median timeline for planning and prepare interviews around concrete claim distinctions, supported by amendments and technical explanations in the written record.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

61.4%
Allow Rate
+9.4% vs TC avg
456
Total Applications
+17.2%
Interview Lift
1116
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 427 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0.2%
§101 Eligibility
11.6%
§102 Novelty
62.0%
§103 Obviousness
21.2%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18371743 FOLDABLE DISPLAY DEVICE Non-Final OA LG Display Co., Ltd.
18395448 DISPLAY DEVICE Final Rejection SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
18333180 ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING ELECTRONIC DEVICES Non-Final OA InnoLux Corporation
18570321 POLYOLEFIN-BASED FILM, METALLIZED FILM INCLUDING SAME, FILM CAPACITOR, POWER CONTROL UNIT, ELECTRIC VEHICLE, AND ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT Non-Final OA Toray Industries, Inc.
18967064 PRECURSOR GLASSES AND GLASS-CERAMICS COMPRISING A CRYSTALLINE PHASE HAVING A JEFFBENITE CRYSTALLINE STRUCTURE Non-Final OA CORNING INCORPORATED
18738614 ANTI-SPARKLE SUBSTRATES, DISPLAY DEVICES, AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME Non-Final OA CORNING INCORPORATED
18838920 GRAIN-ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET AND METHOD OF PRODUCTION OF SAME Final Rejection NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
18721030 ARTICLE COMPRISING A LAYER WITH DISPERSED GLASS FIBERS AND A LAYER WITH CONTINUOUS GLASS FIBERS Non-Final OA SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES B.V.
18663769 RECYCLABLE FOAM COMPOSITE Final Rejection GM Global Technology Operations LLC

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Travis M Figg's allowance rate?

61.4% of resolved applications examined by Travis M Figg were allowed (427 resolved cases), compared with 34.8% across Art Unit 1633 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Travis M Figg?

This examiner's interview lift is +17.2 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Travis M Figg take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Travis M Figg took 1,116 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Travis M Figg work in?

Travis M Figg examines applications in Art Unit 1633 in Tech Center 3600 (Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month