Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Gregory Listvoyb, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as LISTVOYB, GREGORY

Tech Center 1700 • Art Units: 1734 1765 1796

This examiner grants 67% of resolved cases

Analysis

LISTVOYB, GREGORY is a USPTO patent examiner in Tech Center 1700 and Art Unit 1734. The record covers 1219 resolved cases, with a 66.9% allowance rate and a median of 1124 days to allowance. The large record provides substantial experience context, showing that allowed outcomes are common but not assured and that prosecution often extends beyond a short examination cycle.

The interview lift is 29.4%, indicating a meaningful association between interviews and allowance outcomes. The listed companies are LG Chem, 3M Innovative Properties, and Bridgestone. The listed firms are Foley & Lardner, Grüneberg Global IP, and Kenja IP Law. Practitioners may use this profile to support deliberate interview planning alongside technically precise written responses.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

66.9%
Allow Rate
+1.9% vs TC avg
1,266
Total Applications
+29.4%
Interview Lift
1124
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 1219 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0.3%
§101 Eligibility
20.5%
§102 Novelty
58.4%
§103 Obviousness
7.0%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18701959 ARTICLES HAVING A COATING INCLUDING POLYELECTROLYTES AND A PHOTOCLEAVABLE POLYMER, AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME Non-Final OA 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY
18269720 UV-CURABLE TAPE Non-Final OA 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY
18712468 RUBBER COMPOSITION FOR TIRE, TREAD RUBBER, AND TIRE Non-Final OA BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION
18698054 USE OF AQUEOUS POLYMER COMPOSITIONS AS STAINS FOR POROUS MATERIALS Non-Final OA BASF SE
18256527 POLYETHERESTER POLYOL AND USE THEREOF FOR PRODUCING POLYURETHANE RIGID FOAM MATERIALS Non-Final OA BASF SE
17284494 CONDUCTIVE MOULDING COMPOUNDS Final Rejection Evonik Operations GmbH
18706184 AQUEOUS DISPERSION OF POLYMER PARTICLES AND USES THEREOF AS AN ADHESIVE COMPOSITION Non-Final OA ARKEMA FRANCE
16495898 SEMI-CRYSTALLINE POLYAMIDE COMPOSITION HAVING A HIGH GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE AND A HIGH MELTING TEMPERATURE FOR A THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL, PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF AND USES OF SAME Non-Final OA Arkema France
18735757 CURABLE COMPOSITION, MOLDED BODY, SILICONE HYDROGEL, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SILICONE HYDROGEL, AND MACROMONOMER Non-Final OA Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
18627503 RESIN, RESIN COMPOSITION, AND SHAPED OBJECT Non-Final OA Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
18290498 REACTOR AND METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF POLYCARBONATE Final Rejection SABIC Global Technologies B.V.
18257692 POLYESTER COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING TETRAMETHYL CYCLOBUTANEDIOL AND CYCLOHEXANEDIMETHANOL HAVING AN IMPROVED CATALYST SYSTEM COMPRISING LITHIUM AND ALUMINUM ATOMS Final Rejection Eastman Chemical Company
17595107 RECYCLABLE MOLDED ARTICLES FROM BLENDS OF COPOLYESTERS AND RECYCLED PET Final Rejection Eastman Chemical Company
18385786 BRANCHED POLY(LACTIC ACID-3-HYDROXYPROPIONIC ACID)COPOLYMER AND METHOD FOR PREPARATION THEREOF Final Rejection LG CHEM, LTD.
18250172 POLYIMIDE POLYMER FILM, SUBSTRATE FOR FLEXIBLE DISPLAY DEVICE, AND FLEXIBLE DISPLAY DEVICE USING THE SAME Non-Final OA LG CHEM, LTD.
17762032 MATERIAL FOR 3D PRINTING, 3D PRINTED OBJECT, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING 3D PRINTED OBJECT Non-Final OA MITSUI CHEMICALS, INC.
17439727 THERMOPLASTIC ELASTOMER COMPOSITION AND MOLDED ARTICLE OF THE SAME Non-Final OA MITSUI CHEMICALS, INC.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Gregory Listvoyb's allowance rate?

66.9% of resolved applications examined by Gregory Listvoyb were allowed (1,219 resolved cases), compared with 53.6% across Art Unit 1734 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Gregory Listvoyb?

This examiner's interview lift is +29.4 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Gregory Listvoyb take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Gregory Listvoyb took 1,124 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Gregory Listvoyb work in?

Gregory Listvoyb examines applications in Art Unit 1734 in Tech Center 1700 (Chemistry & Materials).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month