Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Examiner: PANWALKAR, VINEETA S

Tech Center 2600 • Art Units: 2611 2631 2632 2633 2635 2637

This examiner grants 91% of resolved cases

Analysis

Vineeta S. Panwalkar serves as a patent examiner within Tech Center 2600 and Art Unit 2611, where she has reached a resolution in 640 cases. This volume of 640 resolved cases provides a substantial basis for analyzing her prosecution patterns and tendencies. Her allowance rate is 91.1%, a figure that indicates a high frequency of granted patents among her total dispositions. For practitioners, this 91.1% rate suggests that the vast majority of applications she reviews are eventually allowed.

The median days to allowance for her docket is 815. This 815-day metric provides a specific timeline for the duration of the prosecution process from filing to grant. Applicants can use the 815 days to allowance to estimate the time required to secure a patent when working with this examiner. In Tech Center 2600, this 815-day figure serves as a primary benchmark for procedural planning and resource allocation.

The data also shows an interview lift of 8.7%. This 8.7% lift suggests that conducting an interview is associated with an increase in the probability of success. When compared to the 91.1% base allowance rate, the 8.7% lift highlights the potential impact of direct communication with the examiner. Practitioners should consider the 8.7% lift as a factor when deciding whether to engage in oral advocacy for the 640 resolved cases under her review.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

91.1%
Allow Rate
+29.1% vs TC avg
651
Total Applications
+8.7%
Interview Lift
814
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 641 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

8.6%
§101 Eligibility
18.0%
§102 Novelty
44.0%
§103 Obviousness
15.5%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
19100957 CODEBOOK REPORT DESIGN TO SUPPORT DYNAMIC MULTI-TRP COHERENT JOINT TRANSMISSION OPERATION Non-Final OA APPLE INC.
19217327 CENTRALIZED BEAM DETERMINATION FOR FULL DUPLEX COMMUNICATIONS Non-Final OA QUALCOMM Incorporated
18875709 RECIPROCITY-AIDED INTERFERENCE SUPPRESSION VIA EIGEN BEAMFORMING Non-Final OA Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
19256951 DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DATA MODULATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM Non-Final OA ZTE CORPORATION
18909720 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING INTERFERENCE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Non-Final OA Analog Devices International Unlimited Company
19221697 FRAME EXCHANGE METHOD FOR BEAMFORMING Non-Final OA Avalon Technology Solutions LLC
18880022 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING MULTIPLE BANDWIDTH SUPPORT USING A FREQUENCY SHIFTER Non-Final OA JIO PLATFORMS LIMITED
18903799 Device and Method for Signal Retiming Non-Final OA Microsemi SOC Corp.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month