Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Catherine C Premraj, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C

Tech Center 3700 • Art Units: 3794

This examiner grants 57% of resolved cases

Analysis

PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C is assigned to Tech Center 3700 and Art Unit 3794. The profile records 212 resolved cases, a 56.6% allowance rate, and a 1516-day median time to allowance. The 46.4% interview lift is a strong positive signal within this profile, making interview preparation a practical consideration for applicants facing claim disputes.

The recurring companies are Genesis Intelligence LLC, Biosense Webster (Israel) Ltd., and Boston Scientific Corporation. The principal firms are NEO IP, Troutman Pepper Locke LLP, and Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP.

The allowance rate suggests that outcomes are mixed, while the median timing indicates that prosecution can extend over a substantial period. Practitioners should use interviews to focus the record, clarify technical distinctions, and identify amendment paths before investing in prolonged written exchanges.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

56.6%
Allow Rate
-13.4% vs TC avg
288
Total Applications
+46.4%
Interview Lift
1516
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 212 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0.9%
§101 Eligibility
19.2%
§102 Novelty
59.1%
§103 Obviousness
16.2%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18386149 CATHETER AND METHOD TO LOCALIZE ECTOPIC AND REENTRANT ACTIVITY IN THE HEART Final Rejection THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
16912244 THERMAL SYSTEM WITH USER INTERFACE CUSTOMIZATION Final Rejection Stryker Corporation
18648615 CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR ELECTROSURGICAL GENERATOR Non-Final OA Covidien LP
18811023 DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS FOR GASTRECTOMIES Non-Final OA Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.
17472749 STRUCTURED TISSUE CONTACT SURFACE FOR ENERGY-BASED SURGICAL INSTRUMENT Non-Final OA Cilag GmbH International
15791346 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING Final Rejection TERUMO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
19202120 BIO-ELECTRODE COMPOSITION, BIO-ELECTRODE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING BIO-ELECTRODE Non-Final OA SHIN-ETSU CHEMICAL CO., LTD.
18174594 Smart Electrode Structures Made of a Conductive Deformable Material and Methods of Manufacturing the Smart Electrode Structures to Have Signal-Processing Components Embedded in the Conductive Deformable Material Final Rejection Meta Platforms Technologies, LLC
18783894 METHOD OF CONFIRMING SAFE DELIVERY PATHWAY TO PATIENT PRIOR TO ENERGY DELIVERY Final Rejection Medtronic, Inc.
19008113 CONTROLLING CARDIAC ABLATION USING BLOOD ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY Non-Final OA BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD.
19007352 CURVED END EFFECTOR FOR A MEDICAL CATHETER Non-Final OA Biosense Webster (Israel) Ltd.
19006746 PLANAR END EFFECTOR FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ABLATION BY PULSE FIELD ABLATION Non-Final OA Biosense Webster (Israel) Ltd.
17705440 ENT INSTRUMENT WITH RF ELECTRODES ON WIRE FRAME Non-Final OA Biosense Webster (Israel) Ltd.
17403009 CATHETER HAVING ELECTRODES WITH ADJUSTABLE SIZE Non-Final OA BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD.
17197870 ABLATION OF A HARD-TO-ACCESS REGION Non-Final OA Biosense Webster (Israel) Ltd.
18392425 METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRO SURGICAL GENERATOR Final Rejection OLYMPUS WINTER & IBE GMBH
17379953 SURGICAL HANDHELD DEVICE, INSULATION INSERT FOR A SURGICAL HANDHELD DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANIPULATING A SURGICAL HANDHELD DEVICE Non-Final OA OLYMPUS WINTER & IBE GMBH
17605122 MICROELECTRODE, OCCLUDING DEVICE, MICROELECTRODE SYSTEM, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MICROELECTRODE, AND METHOD FOR USING MICROELECTRODE Final Rejection TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY
18390702 ELECTROSURGICAL DEVICE AND METHOD OF USE Non-Final OA Meditrina, Inc.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Catherine C Premraj's allowance rate?

56.6% of resolved applications examined by Catherine C Premraj were allowed (212 resolved cases), compared with 60.1% across Art Unit 3794 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Catherine C Premraj?

This examiner's interview lift is +46.4 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Catherine C Premraj take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Catherine C Premraj took 1,516 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Catherine C Premraj work in?

Catherine C Premraj examines applications in Art Unit 3794 in Tech Center 3700 (Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month