Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Aditya Sharma, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as SHARMA, ADITYA

Tech Center 2800 • Art Units: 1722 2847 2848 2884

This examiner grants 78% of resolved cases

Analysis

SHARMA, ADITYA works in tech center 2800 and art unit 1722. The profile records 41 resolved cases, a 78.0% allowance rate, and a median of 992 days to allowance. Interviews are associated with a 29.5% lift in allowance outcomes, making them a potentially useful part of prosecution planning.

Innolux Corporation, Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd., and Canon Inc. are the listed companies. The listed firms are Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (WA), SMITH TEMPEL BLAHA LLC, and ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP - New York. The relatively limited case history means practitioners should treat the figures as directional and rely on the application record when deciding whether to seek an interview or pursue written amendments.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

78.0%
Allow Rate
+10.0% vs TC avg
67
Total Applications
+29.5%
Interview Lift
992
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 41 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0%
§101 Eligibility
26.2%
§102 Novelty
64.6%
§103 Obviousness
9.2%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18790285 CIRCUIT BOARD AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS Final Rejection CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18746781 DISPLAY DEVICE Non-Final OA LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
18510843 CHARGING CABLE Non-Final OA VOLVO PENTA CORPORATION
18810911 ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME Non-Final OA InnoLux Corporation
18462434 CONDUCTIVE FILM AND TEST COMPONENT Non-Final OA Innolux Corporation
18729016 CIRCUIT BOARD Final Rejection Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
18806380 POWER COUPLING DEVICES FOR HIGH-TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTORS Non-Final OA Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC
18808203 ELECTRONIC COMPONENT, CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD Non-Final OA Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
18771130 Electronic Component Mounting Board Final Rejection ROHM CO., LTD.
18783666 PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD Non-Final OA SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO., LTD.
18768907 PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF Non-Final OA SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO., LTD.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Aditya Sharma's allowance rate?

78.0% of resolved applications examined by Aditya Sharma were allowed (41 resolved cases), compared with 60.4% across Art Unit 1722 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Aditya Sharma?

This examiner's interview lift is +29.5 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Aditya Sharma take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Aditya Sharma took 992 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Aditya Sharma work in?

Aditya Sharma examines applications in Art Unit 1722 in Tech Center 2800 (Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month