Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Adams IP, LLC

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

6 pending office actions • 4 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

AdamsIP, LLC is a patent law firm that focuses on the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, having handled 591 career applications. The firm achieves a resolved allowance rate of 87.35 percent, which demonstrates a capability in securing patent rights for life sciences clients. This success rate is a benchmark for their performance in this field.

The firm currently manages 7 pending office actions. Their average of 1.81 office actions per allowance suggests an efficient prosecution process. This 1.81 average indicates that the firm often reaches an allowance with the rounds of rejection recorded in the data. For practitioners, this efficiency is a differentiator when considering the firm's approach to Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals.

With 591 career applications, the firm has a foundation of experience. The 87.35 percent allowance rate, combined with the 1.81 office actions per allowance, highlights a firm that achieves its results with the examiner interactions shown. These metrics, along with the 7 pending office actions, provide a profile of the firm's prosecution activity.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=591 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.4%
Allowance Rate
n=591
+0.48σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=591
1.8
OAs to Allowance
n=359
-1.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=359
813 days
Time to Allowance
n=359
+8.0pp
Interview Lift
n=591
8.8%
RCE Rate
n=591
0.5%
Appeal Rate
n=591

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

55.3%
§101 Overcome
n=38
82.6%
§102 Overcome
n=115
74.6%
§103 Overcome
n=201
75.4%
§112 Overcome
n=134

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, G16H
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=591
3
Practitioners
n=591
197.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=591

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (17%)
1
Unknown (17%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Double-patenting + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)
No statute on record1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
1
Communications
17% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AWAD, AMR A 1 36.4% +20.4%
WELLS, LAUREN QUINLAN 1 48.4% +60.3%
ZAIDI, SYED A 1 81.9% +12.2%
WELLES, COLMAN THOMAS 1 29.2% +64.2%
GOODBODY, JOAN T 1 51.2% +36.2%
GILL, JENNIFER FRANCES 1 28.3% +47.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18535688 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SECURELY ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING INFORMATION ON A DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING MULTIPLE DISPLAY WINDOWS ZAIDI, SYED A 162d overdue

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17508678 HAIRBRUSH WITH REMOVEABLE HEAD GILL, JENNIFER FRANCES 156d overdue
18275002 LIQUID PESTICIDE COMPOSITION CONTAINING NANO-BUBBLES AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF WELLES, COLMAN THOMAS 27d

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19040822 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DECREASING DATA TRANSFER BETWEEN COMPUTING DEVICES AWAD, AMR A 162d overdue
18535688 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SECURELY ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING INFORMATION ON A DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING MULTIPLE DISPLAY WINDOWS ZAIDI, SYED A 162d overdue
17508678 HAIRBRUSH WITH REMOVEABLE HEAD GILL, JENNIFER FRANCES 156d overdue
18207566 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CONTENT PRESENTED ON DISPLAYS WITHIN VEHICLES USING A MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICE GOODBODY, JOAN T 2d overdue
18275002 LIQUID PESTICIDE COMPOSITION CONTAINING NANO-BUBBLES AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF WELLES, COLMAN THOMAS 27d
18599048 FUNCTIONALIZED MATERIALS AND COMPOUNDS WELLS, LAUREN QUINLAN —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26231
16911
24321
16121
36641
37721

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19040822 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DECREASING DATA TRANSFER BETWEEN COMPUTING DEVICES Sharesafe Media, LLC AWAD, AMR A 2623 Other Final Rejection 162d overdue Pending Jan 29, 2025
18599048 FUNCTIONALIZED MATERIALS AND COMPOUNDS University of South Alabama WELLS, LAUREN QUINLAN 1691 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2024
18535688 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SECURELY ACCESSING AND DISPLAYING INFORMATION ON A DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING MULTIPLE DISPLAY WINDOWS Sharesafe Media, LLC ZAIDI, SYED A 2432 §112 Final Rejection 162d overdue Pending Dec 11, 2023
18275002 LIQUID PESTICIDE COMPOSITION CONTAINING NANO-BUBBLES AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF Greaux Alliance, LLC WELLES, COLMAN THOMAS 1612 §103§112 Final Rejection 27d Pending Jul 29, 2023
18207566 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING CONTENT PRESENTED ON DISPLAYS WITHIN VEHICLES USING A MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICE Sharesafe Media, LLC GOODBODY, JOAN T 3664 §103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Jun 08, 2023
17508678 HAIRBRUSH WITH REMOVEABLE HEAD Chrisohny Management, Inc. GILL, JENNIFER FRANCES 3772 §103§112 Final Rejection 156d overdue Pending Oct 22, 2021

Managing Adams IP, LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month