Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Alford Law Group, Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Communications

12 pending office actions • 6 clients • 10 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Alford Law Group, Inc. is a patent law firm that focuses on Communications, having handled 280 career applications. The firm achieves a resolved allowance rate of 87.5 percent, which demonstrates a track record in securing patent rights for communications inventions. This success rate is an indicator of their performance in this field.

The firm currently manages 11 pending office actions. Their prosecution history includes an average of 2.71 office actions per allowance. This figure indicates an efficient prosecution process, with the firm typically reaching an allowance in the rounds of examiner interaction recorded in the data. For practitioners, the 2.71 average provides a benchmark for estimating the effort required for new filings in Communications.

With 280 career applications, the firm has established its presence in the industry. The 87.5 percent allowance rate and 2.71 office actions per allowance together describe a firm that is both effective and efficient. These metrics, along with the 11 pending office actions, offer a view of the firm's prosecution activity.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=280 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.5%
Allowance Rate
n=280
+0.46σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=280
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=126
-0.45σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=126
1063 days
Time to Allowance
n=126
+1.6pp
Interview Lift
n=280
32.6%
RCE Rate
n=280
1.3%
Appeal Rate
n=280

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

60.0%
§101 Overcome
n=20
77.6%
§102 Overcome
n=58
72.2%
§103 Overcome
n=79
69.2%
§112 Overcome
n=65

Specialization & Scale

G01N, G06F, G06V
Top CPC Subclasses
34%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=280
2
Practitioners
n=280
140.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=280

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (3)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (75%)
3
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (33%)
§103 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting + other2 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (42%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
33% of docket
2
Information Tech
17% of docket
3
Communications
25% of docket
2
Semiconductors
17% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
8% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JACKSON, JAKIEDA R 3 74.2% +15.6%
IVICH, FERNANDO NMN 1 48.7% +69.8%
SHALU, ZELALEM W 1 31.6% +20.4%
TRAN, CHAU NGUYEN BICH 1 31.6% +45.2%
STREGE, JOHN B 1 87.0% +13.8%
KWAK, DEAN P 1 58.7% +37.1%
LIPMAN, JACOB 1 83.3% +12.8%
COOK, JONATHON 1 81.6% +17.0%
FONSECA LOPEZ, FRANCINI ALVARENGA 1 29.6% +37.1%
BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE 1 64.8% +32.5%

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17994395 METHODS, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEMS FOR AN OPTICAL FIBER FORWARD SCATTER CHANNEL IN FLOW CYTOMETERS COOK, JONATHON 77d overdue
18297615 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REMOVABLE NOZZLE WITH CAM LATCH ENGAGEMENT IN FLOW CYTOMETERS KWAK, DEAN P 44d overdue
16418942 FAST RECOMPENSATION OF FLOW CYTOMETERY DATA FOR SPILLOVER READJUSTMENTS BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE 14d
18507074 BOOSTING, CORRECTING, AND BLOCKING TO PROVIDE IMPROVED TRANSCRIBED AND TRANSLATED RESULTS OF CLOUD-BASED MEETINGS JACKSON, JAKIEDA R 39d
18239137 ADAPTABLE SYSTEMS FOR DISCOVERING INTENT FROM ENTERPRISE DATA SHALU, ZELALEM W 55d
18173051 ELECTRONIC DEVICES WITH A STATIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL FOR CONTEXTUAL SITUATIONS, INCLUDING AGE BLOCKING FOR VAPING AND IGNITION START, USING DATA ANALYSIS AND OPERATING METHODS THEREOF LIPMAN, JACOB 56d
18215158 AUTO HIGH CONTENT SCREENING USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR DRUG COMPOUND DEVELOPMENT STREGE, JOHN B 86d
18927838 LARGE LANGUAGE MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR SERVICE PROVIDER VIRTUAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS JACKSON, JAKIEDA R —

Interview Candidates (12)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17994395 METHODS, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEMS FOR AN OPTICAL FIBER FORWARD SCATTER CHANNEL IN FLOW CYTOMETERS COOK, JONATHON 77d overdue
18297615 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REMOVABLE NOZZLE WITH CAM LATCH ENGAGEMENT IN FLOW CYTOMETERS KWAK, DEAN P 44d overdue
16992489 SYSTEM AND METHOD USING CLOUD STRUCTURES IN REAL TIME SPEECH AND TRANSLATION INVOLVING MULTIPLE LANGUAGES, CONTEXT SETTING, AND TRANSCRIPTING FEATURES JACKSON, JAKIEDA R 12d
16418942 FAST RECOMPENSATION OF FLOW CYTOMETERY DATA FOR SPILLOVER READJUSTMENTS BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE 14d
18507074 BOOSTING, CORRECTING, AND BLOCKING TO PROVIDE IMPROVED TRANSCRIBED AND TRANSLATED RESULTS OF CLOUD-BASED MEETINGS JACKSON, JAKIEDA R 39d
18239137 ADAPTABLE SYSTEMS FOR DISCOVERING INTENT FROM ENTERPRISE DATA SHALU, ZELALEM W 55d
18173051 ELECTRONIC DEVICES WITH A STATIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL FOR CONTEXTUAL SITUATIONS, INCLUDING AGE BLOCKING FOR VAPING AND IGNITION START, USING DATA ANALYSIS AND OPERATING METHODS THEREOF LIPMAN, JACOB 56d
18215158 AUTO HIGH CONTENT SCREENING USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR DRUG COMPOUND DEVELOPMENT STREGE, JOHN B 86d

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26572
28772
16571
21451
16771
26691
17981
24311
16851

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18927838 LARGE LANGUAGE MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR SERVICE PROVIDER VIRTUAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Predii, Inc. JACKSON, JAKIEDA R §101§102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18747407 ULTRA-BRIGHT NANOPARTICLE FLUORESCENT DYE COMPLEXES Cytek Biosciences, Inc. IVICH, FERNANDO NMN 1657 §102§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 18, 2024
18507074 BOOSTING, CORRECTING, AND BLOCKING TO PROVIDE IMPROVED TRANSCRIBED AND TRANSLATED RESULTS OF CLOUD-BASED MEETINGS Wordly, Inc. JACKSON, JAKIEDA R 2657 §101§103 Final Rejection 39d Pending Nov 12, 2023
18239137 ADAPTABLE SYSTEMS FOR DISCOVERING INTENT FROM ENTERPRISE DATA Predii, Inc. SHALU, ZELALEM W 2145 §101§103 Non-Final OA 55d Pending Aug 29, 2023
18353056 B CELL MONITORING REAGENT PANEL AND REAGENT KIT FOR ANALYZING B CELL SUBSETS IN ANTI-CD20 TREATED AUTOIMMUNE PATIENTS Cytek Biosciences, Inc. TRAN, CHAU NGUYEN BICH 1677 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 14, 2023
18215158 AUTO HIGH CONTENT SCREENING USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR DRUG COMPOUND DEVELOPMENT Viqi, Inc. STREGE, JOHN B 2669 §103§112 Non-Final OA 86d Pending Jun 27, 2023
18297615 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REMOVABLE NOZZLE WITH CAM LATCH ENGAGEMENT IN FLOW CYTOMETERS Cytek Biosciences, Inc. KWAK, DEAN P 1798 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 44d overdue Pending Apr 08, 2023
18173051 ELECTRONIC DEVICES WITH A STATIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL FOR CONTEXTUAL SITUATIONS, INCLUDING AGE BLOCKING FOR VAPING AND IGNITION START, USING DATA ANALYSIS AND OPERATING METHODS THEREOF Aerendir Mobile Inc. LIPMAN, JACOB 2431 §103§112 Final Rejection 56d Pending Mar 04, 2023
17994395 METHODS, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEMS FOR AN OPTICAL FIBER FORWARD SCATTER CHANNEL IN FLOW CYTOMETERS Cytek Biosciences, Inc. COOK, JONATHON 2877 §102§103 Non-Final OA 77d overdue Pending Nov 28, 2022
17650067 MACHINE LEARNING FOR EARLY DETECTION OF CELLULAR MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES Viqi, Inc. FONSECA LOPEZ, FRANCINI ALVARENGA 1685 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 04, 2022
16992489 SYSTEM AND METHOD USING CLOUD STRUCTURES IN REAL TIME SPEECH AND TRANSLATION INVOLVING MULTIPLE LANGUAGES, CONTEXT SETTING, AND TRANSCRIPTING FEATURES Wordly Inc. JACKSON, JAKIEDA R 2657 §103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending Aug 13, 2020
16418942 FAST RECOMPENSATION OF FLOW CYTOMETERY DATA FOR SPILLOVER READJUSTMENTS Cytek Biosciences, Inc. BRYANT, REBECCA CAROLE 2877 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 14d Pending May 21, 2019

Managing Alford Law Group, Inc.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month