Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Amarok Ip Inc.

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

17 pending office actions • 3 clients • 17 examiners • 14 art units • 0 of 17 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Amarok IP Inc. focuses on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area, where it has filed 183 career applications. This boutique scale suggests a concentrated focus on its clients' mechanical and e-commerce innovations. The firm currently has 15 pending office actions under management.

The firm achieves a high resolved allowance rate pct of 91.09, showing a strong ability to secure patent rights. However, the prosecution process is relatively intensive, requiring an avg office actions per allowance of 3.96. This suggests that while the firm is highly successful, it often engages in multiple rounds of amendments or arguments to reach an allowance.

For practitioners, the 91.09 resolved allowance rate pct is a key indicator of the firm's persistence. The 3.96 avg office actions per allowance reflects the effort required to maintain such a high success rate in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. With 183 career applications and 15 pending office actions, the firm demonstrates a commitment to achieving results through rigorous prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=183 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.1%
Allowance Rate
n=183
+0.47σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=183
4.0
OAs to Allowance
n=92
+0.04σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=92
885 days
Time to Allowance
n=92
+11.2pp
Interview Lift
n=183
65.4%
RCE Rate
n=183
1.4%
Appeal Rate
n=183

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

42.1%
§101 Overcome
n=38
72.1%
§102 Overcome
n=61
69.1%
§103 Overcome
n=97
66.0%
§112 Overcome
n=53

Specialization & Scale

H04L, B65G, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
42%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=183
1
Practitioners
n=183
183.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=183

Portfolio Summary

17
Total Pending OAs
12
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

7
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 10 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (7)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (59%)
6
Medium (35%)
1
Easy (6%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only5 (29%)
§101 + other4 (24%)
§103 only6 (35%)
Double-patenting only1 (6%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (6%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
9
Information Tech
53% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
47% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

170 h
Manual time on pending OAs
34 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
59 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIMPSON, DIONE N 1 32.6% +32.4%
LE, UYEN T 1 83.9% +9.5%
LEROUX, ETIENNE PIERRE 1 88.5% +5.3%
MEJIA, ANTHONY 1 83.7% +18.2%
TRAN, ANHTAI V 1 79.2% +16.1%
RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 1 26.3% +23.5%
WHITAKER, ANDREW B 1 18.6% +19.0%
HWANG, JOON H 1 13.0% +4.1%
NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 1 76.4% +10.7%
REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 1 81.5% +15.4%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18389918 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CONTENT CLASSIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENCE LEVEL REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 71d overdue
18963625 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SOCIAL ELECTRONIC LEARNING LEROUX, ETIENNE PIERRE 15d overdue
18944793 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING AND HANDLING VOICE OVER IP TRAFFIC MEJIA, ANTHONY —

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17325368 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING LEARNER ENGAGEMENT DURING A LEARNING EVENT ZAMAN, SADARUZ 50d overdue
18390988 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CLASSIFICATION NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 31d overdue
18821158 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CROWD SOURCING IN AN ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 3d overdue
17665194 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYZING LEARNER'S ROLES AND PERFORMANCE AND FOR INTELLIGENTLY ADAPTING THE DELIVERY OF EDUCATION HULL, JAMES B 9d
18989360 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COURSE ASSESSMENT IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SIMPSON, DIONE N 29d
18103657 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RECOMMENDING INDIVIDUALS FOR OPEN ROLES HOLZMACHER, DERICK J 83d
18972141 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OBTAINING METADATA ABOUT CONTENT STORED IN A REPOSITORY LE, UYEN T —
18678820 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING VISUALIZATIONS INDICATIVE OF LEARNER PERFORMANCE IN AN eLEARNING SYSTEM WHITAKER, ANDREW B —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18389918 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CONTENT CLASSIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENCE LEVEL REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 71d overdue
18390988 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CLASSIFICATION NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 31d overdue
18912807 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMMUNICATION BETWEEN REPOSITORIES TRAN, ANHTAI V 28d overdue
18821158 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CROWD SOURCING IN AN ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 3d overdue
18989360 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COURSE ASSESSMENT IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SIMPSON, DIONE N 29d
18944793 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING AND HANDLING VOICE OVER IP TRAFFIC MEJIA, ANTHONY —
18678820 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING VISUALIZATIONS INDICATIVE OF LEARNER PERFORMANCE IN AN eLEARNING SYSTEM WHITAKER, ANDREW B —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37153
36292
36281
21561
21611
24551
21681
36261
24471
24591

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18989360 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COURSE ASSESSMENT IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM D2L Corporation SIMPSON, DIONE N 3628 §101 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Dec 20, 2024
18972141 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OBTAINING METADATA ABOUT CONTENT STORED IN A REPOSITORY D2L Corporation LE, UYEN T 2156 §101§112DP Final Rejection — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18963625 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SOCIAL ELECTRONIC LEARNING D2L Corporation LEROUX, ETIENNE PIERRE 2161 §103 Non-Final OA 15d overdue Pending Nov 28, 2024
18944793 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING AND HANDLING VOICE OVER IP TRAFFIC Sandvine Corporation MEJIA, ANTHONY 2455 DP Final Rejection — Pending Nov 12, 2024
18912807 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMMUNICATION BETWEEN REPOSITORIES D2L Corporation TRAN, ANHTAI V 2168 §103 Non-Final OA 28d overdue Pending Oct 11, 2024
18821158 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CROWD SOURCING IN AN ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT D2L Corporation RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 3626 §101 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Aug 30, 2024
18678820 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING VISUALIZATIONS INDICATIVE OF LEARNER PERFORMANCE IN AN eLEARNING SYSTEM D2L Corporation WHITAKER, ANDREW B 3629 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 30, 2024
18392107 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CAPACITY PLANNING Sandvine Corporation HWANG, JOON H 2447 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 21, 2023
18390988 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CLASSIFICATION Sandvine Corporation NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 2459 §103§112 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2023
18389918 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CONTENT CLASSIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENCE LEVEL Sandvine Corporation REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 2475 §103 Final Rejection 71d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2023
18470793 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING NETWORK TRAFFIC IN A DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENT Sandvine Corporation MAHMUD, GOLAM 2458 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 20, 2023
18450595 System and Method for Management of Remote Assets with Data Aggregation TyCorra Investments Inc. WASAFF, JOHN S. 3629 §101§102 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 16, 2023
18303953 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING OBFUSCATED TRAFFIC FLOWS Sandvine Corporation ZHANG, ZHENSHENG 2474 §103 Non-Final OA 19d overdue Pending Apr 20, 2023
18103657 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RECOMMENDING INDIVIDUALS FOR OPEN ROLES D2L Corporation HOLZMACHER, DERICK J 3625 §101 Non-Final OA 83d Pending Jan 31, 2023
17665194 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYZING LEARNER'S ROLES AND PERFORMANCE AND FOR INTELLIGENTLY ADAPTING THE DELIVERY OF EDUCATION D2L Corporation HULL, JAMES B 3715 §101 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Feb 04, 2022
17325368 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING LEARNER ENGAGEMENT DURING A LEARNING EVENT D2L Corporation ZAMAN, SADARUZ 3715 §101§103 Non-Final OA 50d overdue Pending May 20, 2021
16699034 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING ASSESSMENTS IN AN ELECTRONIC LEARNING SYSTEM D2L Corporation UTAMA, ROBERT J 3715 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 28, 2019

Managing Amarok Ip Inc.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month