Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Amarok Ip Inc.

15 pending office actions • 3 clients • 15 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 19 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
9
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 15 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

12
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 15 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (12)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (7%)
14
Medium (93%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (7%)
§103 only13 (87%)
§102 only1 (7%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
40% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
9
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIMPSON, DIONE N 1 33.1% +34.4%
LEROUX, ETIENNE PIERRE 1 88.4% +5.4%
TRAN, ANHTAI V 1 79.1% +16.1%
PRASAD, NANCY N 1 21.5% +18.2%
RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 1 26.2% +22.8%
SPAR, ILANA L 1 45.3% +28.4%
HU, KANG 1 34.5% +36.1%
MIAH, RAZU A 1 84.6% +26.4%
REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 1 86.7% +19.3%
NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 1 76.3% +10.7%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18442208 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING APPLICATION QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE BASED ON APPLICATION AND CONTENT CATEGORIES MIAH, RAZU A 84d overdue
18389918 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CONTENT CLASSIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENCE LEVEL REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 71d overdue
18963625 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SOCIAL ELECTRONIC LEARNING LEROUX, ETIENNE PIERRE 15d overdue

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18910663 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COURSE ASSESSMENT IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRASAD, NANCY N 67d overdue
18821158 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CROWD SOURCING IN AN ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 3d overdue
17665194 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYZING LEARNER'S ROLES AND PERFORMANCE AND FOR INTELLIGENTLY ADAPTING THE DELIVERY OF EDUCATION HULL, JAMES B 9d

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18442208 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING APPLICATION QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE BASED ON APPLICATION AND CONTENT CATEGORIES MIAH, RAZU A 84d overdue
18821232 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COURSE REGISTRATION IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SPAR, ILANA L 79d overdue
18389918 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CONTENT CLASSIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENCE LEVEL REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 71d overdue
18910663 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COURSE ASSESSMENT IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRASAD, NANCY N 67d overdue
18620304 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR QUESTION/ANSWER GENERATION IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM HU, KANG 52d overdue
18390988 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CLASSIFICATION NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 31d overdue
18912807 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMMUNICATION BETWEEN REPOSITORIES TRAN, ANHTAI V 28d overdue
18821158 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CROWD SOURCING IN AN ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 3d overdue

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
D2L CORPORATION 10
Sandvine Corporation 4
Chirp Inc. 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37153
36281
21611
21681
36241
36261
36221
24411
24751
24591

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18989360 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COURSE ASSESSMENT IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM D2L Corporation SIMPSON, DIONE N 3628 §103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Dec 20, 2024
18963625 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SOCIAL ELECTRONIC LEARNING D2L Corporation LEROUX, ETIENNE PIERRE 2161 §103 Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending Nov 28, 2024
18912807 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMMUNICATION BETWEEN REPOSITORIES D2L Corporation TRAN, ANHTAI V 2168 §103 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending Oct 11, 2024
18910663 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COURSE ASSESSMENT IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM D2L Corporation PRASAD, NANCY N 3624 §103 Non-Final OA 67d overdue Pending Oct 09, 2024
18821158 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CROWD SOURCING IN AN ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT D2L Corporation RUHL, DENNIS WILLIAM 3626 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Aug 30, 2024
18821232 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COURSE REGISTRATION IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM D2L Corporation SPAR, ILANA L 3622 §103 Non-Final OA 79d overdue Pending Aug 30, 2024
18620304 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR QUESTION/ANSWER GENERATION IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM D2L Corporation HU, KANG 3715 §102 Non-Final OA 52d overdue Pending Mar 28, 2024
18442208 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING APPLICATION QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE BASED ON APPLICATION AND CONTENT CATEGORIES Sandvine Corporation MIAH, RAZU A 2441 §103 Non-Final OA 84d overdue Pending Feb 15, 2024
18389918 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CONTENT CLASSIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENCE LEVEL Sandvine Corporation REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY 2475 §103 Non-Final OA 71d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2023
18390988 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CLASSIFICATION Sandvine Corporation NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 2459 §103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2023
18303953 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING OBFUSCATED TRAFFIC FLOWS Sandvine Corporation ZHANG, ZHENSHENG 2474 §103 Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Apr 20, 2023
18103657 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RECOMMENDING INDIVIDUALS FOR OPEN ROLES D2L Corporation HOLZMACHER, DERICK J 3625 §103 Final Rejection 83d Pending Jan 31, 2023
17846547 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED AMBIENT MOBILITY TESTING Chirp Inc. VALVIS, ALEXANDER M 3791 §103 Non-Final OA 58d overdue Pending Jun 22, 2022
17665194 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYZING LEARNER'S ROLES AND PERFORMANCE AND FOR INTELLIGENTLY ADAPTING THE DELIVERY OF EDUCATION D2L Corporation HULL, JAMES B 3715 §101 Final Rejection 9d Pending Feb 04, 2022
17325368 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING LEARNER ENGAGEMENT DURING A LEARNING EVENT D2L Corporation ZAMAN, SADARUZ 3715 §103 Final Rejection 50d overdue Pending May 20, 2021

Managing Amarok Ip Inc.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month