5 pending office actions • 1 client • 5 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (60%) |
| §102 only | 2 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| YANG, JEFFREY ANDREW | 1 | 84.8% | +27.8% |
| HOU, FRANK S | 1 | 71.5% | +34.5% |
| MARTIN, KEVIN STEPHEN | 1 | 75.9% | +23.6% |
| CROW, ROBERT THOMAS | 1 | 41.3% | +31.8% |
| JEBUTU, MOFOLUWASO SIMILOLUWA | 1 | 35.2% | +42.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18641741 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR AUTOMATED TEST PATTERN GENERATION FOR LOGIC CIRCUITS WITH BOOLEAN SATISFIABILITY ANALYSIS | YANG, JEFFREY ANDREW | 15d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18324555 | HIGH ENTROPY OXIDES AND METHODS OF SYNTHESIS AND USE THEREOF | HOU, FRANK S | 7d |
| 18641741 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR AUTOMATED TEST PATTERN GENERATION FOR LOGIC CIRCUITS WITH BOOLEAN SATISFIABILITY ANALYSIS | YANG, JEFFREY ANDREW | 15d |
| 17388991 | NANOCOMPOSITE MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING AND USING NANOCOMPOSITE MATERIALS | JEBUTU, MOFOLUWASO SIMILOLUWA | 34d |
| 18320470 | REPOSITIONING THE ANTI-LEPROSY DRUG CLOFAZIMINE AGAINST DRUG-RESISTANT MYELOMA AND PUTATIVE STEM-CELL SUBCLONES | MARTIN, KEVIN STEPHEN | 46d |
| 17789161 | ELECTROCHEMICAL PROXIMITY ASSAY | CROW, ROBERT THOMAS | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Auburn University | 5 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2111 | 1 |
| 1692 | 1 |
| 1624 | 1 |
| 1683 | 1 |
| 1795 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18641741 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR AUTOMATED TEST PATTERN GENERATION FOR LOGIC CIRCUITS WITH BOOLEAN SATISFIABILITY ANALYSIS | Auburn University | YANG, JEFFREY ANDREW | 2111 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Apr 22, 2024 |
| 18324555 | HIGH ENTROPY OXIDES AND METHODS OF SYNTHESIS AND USE THEREOF | Auburn University | HOU, FRANK S | 1692 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 7d | Pending | May 26, 2023 |
| 18320470 | REPOSITIONING THE ANTI-LEPROSY DRUG CLOFAZIMINE AGAINST DRUG-RESISTANT MYELOMA AND PUTATIVE STEM-CELL SUBCLONES | Auburn University | MARTIN, KEVIN STEPHEN | 1624 | §103 | Final Rejection | 46d | Pending | May 19, 2023 |
| 17789161 | ELECTROCHEMICAL PROXIMITY ASSAY | Auburn University | CROW, ROBERT THOMAS | 1683 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 24, 2022 |
| 17388991 | NANOCOMPOSITE MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING AND USING NANOCOMPOSITE MATERIALS | Auburn University | JEBUTU, MOFOLUWASO SIMILOLUWA | 1795 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Jul 29, 2021 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial