Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Blanchard Horton Pllc

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

10 pending office actions • 6 clients • 10 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Blanchard Horton PLLC operates in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector, having managed 422 career applications. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 89.51 percent, which is a strong indicator of its success. Currently, there are 6 pending office actions under the firm's management relative to its 422 career applications.

The firm averages 2.65 office actions per allowance, reflecting an efficient prosecution process that typically involves multiple rounds of communication with the patent office. This 2.65 average, combined with the 89.51 percent resolved allowance rate, suggests an effective approach to securing patent rights. With 422 career applications, the firm has established a solid presence. The 6 pending office actions and the 2.65 office actions per allowance metric provide a detailed look at the firm's current and historical prosecution performance, offering valuable insights into its typical outcomes and efficiency.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=422 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.5%
Allowance Rate
n=422
+0.57σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=422
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=239
-0.48σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=239
984 days
Time to Allowance
n=239
+5.8pp
Interview Lift
n=422
21.0%
RCE Rate
n=422
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=422

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
79.6%
§102 Overcome
n=113
75.8%
§103 Overcome
n=157
82.6%
§112 Overcome
n=132

Specialization & Scale

A61K, B29D, B01J
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=422
2
Practitioners
n=422
211.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=422

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (40%)
5
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (40%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Double-patenting + other1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
10% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
3
Business / Other
30% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOLLOMAN, NANNETTE 1 60.7% +22.8%
AMPONSAH, OSEI K 1 72.4% +33.1%
SPIES, BRADLEY R 1 74.2% +20.5%
MAEWALL, SNIGDHA 1 58.8% +10.5%
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL 1 80.1% +13.9%
WEBB, WALTER E 1 46.3% +18.8%
MARMOR II, CHARLES ALAN 1 12.4% +25.7%
CALEY, MICHAEL H 1 65.1% +13.0%
WAX, ROBERT A 1 25.0% +3.9%
WHEELER, THURMAN MICHAEL 1 45.8% +23.5%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18615236 MICROEMULSION DELIVERY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED INTO GUMMY CONFECTIONS WEBB, WALTER E 5d overdue
18132589 Drug Delivery Cannula with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Capability MARMOR II, CHARLES ALAN 33d
17707067 Self-Microemulsifying Multi-Deliverable Systems WAX, ROBERT A 34d
18938462 Fire Resistant Electrolyte for Lithium Batteries AMPONSAH, OSEI K —
18924304 Electro-Pressure Membrane Method for Recovery and Concentration of Lithium from Aqueous Sources SPIES, BRADLEY R —
18813727 Sofa with Swivel Feature BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17765283 Fibre Optic Connector CALEY, MICHAEL H 330d overdue
17672894 Microemulsion Delivery Systems for Alcohol-Soluble Species Including Nonderivatized Hormones WHEELER, THURMAN MICHAEL 38d overdue
18615236 MICROEMULSION DELIVERY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED INTO GUMMY CONFECTIONS WEBB, WALTER E 5d overdue
18132589 Drug Delivery Cannula with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Capability MARMOR II, CHARLES ALAN 33d
19083881 Means For Mitochondrial Performance Enhancement HOLLOMAN, NANNETTE —
18938462 Fire Resistant Electrolyte for Lithium Batteries AMPONSAH, OSEI K —
18924304 Electro-Pressure Membrane Method for Recovery and Concentration of Lithium from Aqueous Sources SPIES, BRADLEY R —
18891496 Solid Binding Composition for Toxin Excretion Enhancement MAEWALL, SNIGDHA —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17521
36361
16121
37911
28711
16151
16191

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19083881 Means For Mitochondrial Performance Enhancement Quicksilver Scientific, Inc. HOLLOMAN, NANNETTE §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 19, 2025
18938462 Fire Resistant Electrolyte for Lithium Batteries American Hyperform, Inc. AMPONSAH, OSEI K 1752 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 06, 2024
18924304 Electro-Pressure Membrane Method for Recovery and Concentration of Lithium from Aqueous Sources Aqueous Resources LLC SPIES, BRADLEY R §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2024
18891496 Solid Binding Composition for Toxin Excretion Enhancement Quicksilver Scientific, Inc. MAEWALL, SNIGDHA §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 20, 2024
18813727 Sofa with Swivel Feature Kenneth Charles Design, LLC BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL 3636 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 23, 2024
18615236 MICROEMULSION DELIVERY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED INTO GUMMY CONFECTIONS Quicksilver Scientific, Inc. WEBB, WALTER E 1612 §103§112 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Mar 25, 2024
18132589 Drug Delivery Cannula with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Capability Pacific Diabetes Technologies, Inc. MARMOR II, CHARLES ALAN 3791 §103 Final Rejection 33d Pending Apr 10, 2023
17765283 Fibre Optic Connector Ridgemount Technologies Limited CALEY, MICHAEL H 2871 §103 Non-Final OA 330d overdue Pending Mar 30, 2022
17707067 Self-Microemulsifying Multi-Deliverable Systems Quicksilver Scientific, Inc. WAX, ROBERT A 1615 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Mar 29, 2022
17672894 Microemulsion Delivery Systems for Alcohol-Soluble Species Including Nonderivatized Hormones Quicksilver Scientific, Inc. WHEELER, THURMAN MICHAEL 1619 §112Other Final Rejection 38d overdue Pending Feb 16, 2022

Managing Blanchard Horton Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month