Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Borchers, Hall, Purks & Wall, Pllc

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

8 pending office actions • 7 clients • 8 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Borchers, Hall, Purks & Wall, PLLC works in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics and has 9 pending office actions. Its career record includes 118 applications, providing a defined historical base for reviewing prosecution in this technology area.

The resolved allowance rate is 85.71%, and the average number of office actions per allowance is 3.89. These figures give practitioners separate measures of reported resolved outcomes and the prosecution activity associated with reaching an allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=118 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.7%
Allowance Rate
n=118
+0.72σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=118
3.9
OAs to Allowance
n=54
-0.02σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=54
969 days
Time to Allowance
n=54
+17.0pp
Interview Lift
n=118
36.5%
RCE Rate
n=118
2.3%
Appeal Rate
n=118

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

63.6%
§101 Overcome
n=22
63.9%
§102 Overcome
n=36
62.8%
§103 Overcome
n=51
67.7%
§112 Overcome
n=31

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=118
0
Practitioners
n=118
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=118 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (12%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (12%)
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only1 (12%)
§112 only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
12% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
3
Semiconductors
38% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GUYAH, REMASH RAJA 1 76.9% +38.6%
NGUYEN, THONG Q 1 67.8% +12.0%
CHEN, XUEMEI G 1 77.1% +25.6%
SLACHTA, DOUGLAS M 1 82.8% +18.1%
FENG, ZHENGFU J 1 75.6% +38.8%
LE, JOHN H 1 87.7% +7.0%
KHARE, ATUL P 1 54.8% +72.3%
RUFO, RYAN C 1 59.0% +40.8%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274588 PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM AND USE OF A PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM KHARE, ATUL P 56d
18874009 RADAR MARKER GUYAH, REMASH RAJA —
18849601 TRANSPARENT DISPLAY NGUYEN, THONG Q —
18821806 PROCESSING OF IMAGE DATA WITH A MACHINE-LEARNED FOUNDATION MODEL CHEN, XUEMEI G —
18724033 AN APPROACH FOR CLASSIFYING SOURCE CODE WITH A CODE QUALITY INDICATOR SLACHTA, DOUGLAS M —
18699642 BATTERY STATE ESTIMATION METHOD LE, JOHN H —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18274588 PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM AND USE OF A PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM KHARE, ATUL P 56d
18874009 RADAR MARKER GUYAH, REMASH RAJA —
18849601 TRANSPARENT DISPLAY NGUYEN, THONG Q —
18821806 PROCESSING OF IMAGE DATA WITH A MACHINE-LEARNED FOUNDATION MODEL CHEN, XUEMEI G —
18724033 AN APPROACH FOR CLASSIFYING SOURCE CODE WITH A CODE QUALITY INDICATOR SLACHTA, DOUGLAS M —
18638962 AIRFLOW OPTIMIZATION DEVICES FOR CRYPTOCURRENCY MINING, AND RELATED SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, AND METHODS FENG, ZHENGFU J —
17925466 ALLOY TOOL BIT TWIST DRILL RUFO, RYAN C —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36481
28721
26611
21931
28351
28571
17421
37221

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18874009 RADAR MARKER Altavo GmbH GUYAH, REMASH RAJA 3648 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18849601 TRANSPARENT DISPLAY Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH NGUYEN, THONG Q 2872 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2024
18821806 PROCESSING OF IMAGE DATA WITH A MACHINE-LEARNED FOUNDATION MODEL Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH CHEN, XUEMEI G 2661 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18724033 AN APPROACH FOR CLASSIFYING SOURCE CODE WITH A CODE QUALITY INDICATOR Codescene AB SLACHTA, DOUGLAS M 2193 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 25, 2024
18638962 AIRFLOW OPTIMIZATION DEVICES FOR CRYPTOCURRENCY MINING, AND RELATED SYSTEMS, COMPONENTS, AND METHODS Professional Asic Services LLC FENG, ZHENGFU J 2835 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2024
18699642 BATTERY STATE ESTIMATION METHOD Twaice Technologies GmbH LE, JOHN H 2857 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 09, 2024
18274588 PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM AND USE OF A PLASTIC BLASTING MEDIUM Dyemansion GmbH KHARE, ATUL P 1742 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Jul 27, 2023
17925466 ALLOY TOOL BIT TWIST DRILL Shandong Old Roughneck Machinery Technology Co. Ltd. RUFO, RYAN C 3722 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 15, 2022

Managing Borchers, Hall, Purks & Wall, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Borchers, Hall, Purks & Wall, Pllc's patent allowance rate?

85.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Borchers, Hall, Purks & Wall, Pllc were allowed, across 118 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Borchers, Hall, Purks & Wall, Pllc average before allowance?

3.89 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Borchers, Hall, Purks & Wall, Pllc have?

8 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 7 clients, before 8 examiners in 8 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month