Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Briggs Intellectual Property Law

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

11 pending office actions • 10 clients • 11 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 30 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Briggs Intellectual Property Law focuses on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The firm has a career total of 171 applications. Currently, there are 9 pending office actions, representing the firm's active prosecution docket.

The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 66.38 percent. This is achieved with an average of 1.82 office actions per allowance. This low average indicates a very direct prosecution path, though the allowance rate is lower than some peers in the same technology area. The 66.38 percent rate and 1.82 average provide a clear picture of the firm's prosecution style in mechanical and e-commerce systems. With 9 pending actions, the firm's current workload is focused on a small number of cases. Practitioners can interpret the 1.82 average as a sign of quick resolution. The 171 career applications provide the historical context for these efficiency and success metrics.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=171 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

66.4%
Allowance Rate
n=171
+0.16σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=171
1.8
OAs to Allowance
n=77
-0.79σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=77
796 days
Time to Allowance
n=77
+19.5pp
Interview Lift
n=171
17.2%
RCE Rate
n=171
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=171

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=17 (min 20)
52.2%
§102 Overcome
n=46
39.3%
§103 Overcome
n=84
39.1%
§112 Overcome
n=46

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, G06F, F03D
Top CPC Subclasses
15%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=171
0
Practitioners
n=171
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=171 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (45%)
5
Medium (45%)
1
Easy (9%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (27%)
§103 only4 (36%)
Double-patenting only1 (9%)
Double-patenting + other1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (18%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
27% of docket
2
Information Tech
18% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
9% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
36% of docket
1
Business / Other
9% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AGUDELO, PAOLA 1 76.9% +17.2%
GEHMAN, BRYON P 1 73.8% +30.6%
AHMED, SHEEBA 1 80.7% +14.4%
MITIKU, BERHANU 1 55.2% +29.0%
FISCHER, JUSTIN R 1 44.3% +2.3%
ABYANEH, ALI S 1 77.8% +55.7%
MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD 1 84.0% +11.0%
PIZIALI, ANDREW T 1 28.3% +27.3%
DAO, TUAN C. 1 82.0% +15.6%
CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N 1 27.8% +42.8%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18989172 LATEX COMPOUNDS WITH ENHANCED WATER BARRIER PROTECTION AHMED, SHEEBA —
18804709 MINERAL SEPARATION SYSTEM MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD —
18670317 DISTRIBUTED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM DAO, TUAN C. —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18364584 HISTORICAL DATABASE GENERATION SYSTEM AND METHOD CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N 12d
19054030 ANCHOR SYSTEM AGUDELO, PAOLA —
18966349 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO MANAGE UNSTRUCTURED DATA MITIKU, BERHANU —
18909240 AUTONOMOUS THREAT OPERATION SYSTEM ABYANEH, ALI S —
18796725 SWEAT WICKING AND ABSORBING DEVICE PIZIALI, ANDREW T —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19046589 FLEXIBLE FLUID RESERVOIR SYSTEM GEHMAN, BRYON P 4d overdue
18364584 HISTORICAL DATABASE GENERATION SYSTEM AND METHOD CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N 12d
19054030 ANCHOR SYSTEM AGUDELO, PAOLA —
18989172 LATEX COMPOUNDS WITH ENHANCED WATER BARRIER PROTECTION AHMED, SHEEBA —
18966349 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO MANAGE UNSTRUCTURED DATA MITIKU, BERHANU —
18909240 AUTONOMOUS THREAT OPERATION SYSTEM ABYANEH, ALI S —
18804709 MINERAL SEPARATION SYSTEM MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD —
18796725 SWEAT WICKING AND ABSORBING DEVICE PIZIALI, ANDREW T —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36331
37361
17871
21561
17491
24371
36531
17891
36231
28811

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19054030 ANCHOR SYSTEM Wood'S Pool Service AGUDELO, PAOLA 3633 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2025
19046589 FLEXIBLE FLUID RESERVOIR SYSTEM Appalachia Design GEHMAN, BRYON P 3736 DP Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Feb 06, 2025
18989172 LATEX COMPOUNDS WITH ENHANCED WATER BARRIER PROTECTION Signal Engineering Consulting LLC AHMED, SHEEBA 1787 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18966349 SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO MANAGE UNSTRUCTURED DATA Ohalo Limited MITIKU, BERHANU 2156 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 03, 2024
18932769 LATEX COMPOUNDS WITH ENHANCED WATER BARRIER PROTECTION Signal Engineering Consulting LLC FISCHER, JUSTIN R 1749 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18909240 AUTONOMOUS THREAT OPERATION SYSTEM Simbian, Inc. ABYANEH, ALI S 2437 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 08, 2024
18804709 MINERAL SEPARATION SYSTEM Mason-Grey Corporation MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD 3653 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 14, 2024
18796725 SWEAT WICKING AND ABSORBING DEVICE Bougiene PIZIALI, ANDREW T 1789 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 07, 2024
18670317 DISTRIBUTED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM Skymel Inc. DAO, TUAN C. §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 21, 2024
18364584 HISTORICAL DATABASE GENERATION SYSTEM AND METHOD Jodi Elizabeth Schneider-Ceroll CHONG CRUZ, NADJA N 3623 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 12d Pending Aug 03, 2023
18064017 BODY SUPPORT APPARATUS Beyond Centerline Solutions KALISZEWSKI, ALINA ROSE 2881 §103 Non-Final OA 24d overdue Pending Dec 09, 2022

Managing Briggs Intellectual Property Law's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month