Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Brown & Brown Ip Law Pllc

6 pending office actions • 4 clients • 6 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=97 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

64.7%
Allowance Rate
n=97
+0.06σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=97
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=44
-0.24σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=44
1034 days
Time to Allowance
n=44
+3.0pp
Interview Lift
n=97
26.5%
RCE Rate
n=97
0.9%
Appeal Rate
n=97

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=1 (min 20)
44.7%
§102 Overcome
n=38
50.9%
§103 Overcome
n=55
53.7%
§112 Overcome
n=41

Specialization & Scale

B23B, G08B, E05B
Top CPC Subclasses
25%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=97
2
Practitioners
n=97
48.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=97

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (33%)
4
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
33% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AHMED, MOBEEN 1 61.2% +7.7%
NGUYEN, AN T 1 67.8% +18.7%
GEHMAN, BRYON P 1 73.8% +30.5%
MERLINO, ALYSON MARIE 1 64.5% +31.4%
LUBIT, RYAN A 1 63.4% +38.1%
OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI HARRY 1 87.4% +1.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18580380 A SACHET DISPENSER OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI HARRY 22d

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19315540 Container, Method of Making a Container, and Apparatus for Manufacturing a Container AHMED, MOBEEN 41d
18870679 RETAIL SECURITY ASSEMBLY MERLINO, ALYSON MARIE

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19052613 Container, Method of Making a Container, and Apparatus for Manufacturing a Container GEHMAN, BRYON P 6d
18643299 TOUCH-SENSITIVE CONTROLLER AND INTERFACE, AND METHODS LUBIT, RYAN A 29d
19107560 METHOD FOR TRIGGERING A SECURITY TAG NGUYEN, AN T
18870679 RETAIL SECURITY ASSEMBLY MERLINO, ALYSON MARIE

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37311
26891
37361
36751
26261
36511

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19315540 Container, Method of Making a Container, and Apparatus for Manufacturing a Container Frugalpac Limited AHMED, MOBEEN 3731 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Aug 30, 2025
19107560 METHOD FOR TRIGGERING A SECURITY TAG Sekura Global Ip LLP NGUYEN, AN T 2689 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 27, 2025
19052613 Container, Method of Making a Container, and Apparatus for Manufacturing a Container Frugalpac Limited GEHMAN, BRYON P 3736 §112DP Final Rejection 6d Pending Feb 13, 2025
18870679 RETAIL SECURITY ASSEMBLY Sekura Global Ip LLP MERLINO, ALYSON MARIE 3675 §103§112 Final Rejection Pending Dec 01, 2024
18643299 TOUCH-SENSITIVE CONTROLLER AND INTERFACE, AND METHODS International Controls And Measurements Corporation LUBIT, RYAN A 2626 §103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Apr 23, 2024
18580380 A SACHET DISPENSER Optimal Vision Plus Pty Ltd. OJOFEITIMI, AYODEJI HARRY 3651 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Jan 18, 2024

Managing Brown & Brown Ip Law Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month