Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Burrus Intellectual Property Law Group

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

13 pending office actions • 1 client • 13 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 33 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Burrus Intellectual Property Law Group focuses on the Networking & Security technology area, having handled 437 career applications. This portfolio size indicates a specialized practice with a clear technical focus. The firm currently has 11 pending office actions, which suggests a manageable set of active matters. These figures reflect a boutique approach to intellectual property law within a high-tech sector.

The firm achieves a resolved allowance rate pct of 87.5, showing an ability to secure patent rights for its clients. This rate is coupled with an avg_office_actions_per_allowance of 3.04, indicating that the firm typically reaches an allowance after a specific number of interactions with the USPTO. The 87.5 resolved allowance rate pct is a testament to the firm's effectiveness in navigating the complexities of Networking & Security patents. With 437 career applications, the 3.04 avg_office_actions_per_allowance provides a benchmark for the expected effort required to move an application to issuance. These metrics offer a concise overview of the firm's prosecution efficiency.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=437 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.5%
Allowance Rate
n=437
+0.39σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=437
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=336
-0.21σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=336
826 days
Time to Allowance
n=336
+10.6pp
Interview Lift
n=437
24.2%
RCE Rate
n=437
12.8%
Appeal Rate
n=437

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

50.0%
§101 Overcome
n=28
81.0%
§102 Overcome
n=184
80.3%
§103 Overcome
n=294
77.5%
§112 Overcome
n=71

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04M, H04N
Top CPC Subclasses
45%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=437
0
Practitioners
n=437
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=437 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
4
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (38%)
8
Medium (62%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (15%)
§101 + other2 (15%)
§103 only7 (54%)
§102 only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (8%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
5
Information Tech
38% of docket
2
Communications
15% of docket
2
Semiconductors
15% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
31% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HODGES, SUSAN E 1 67.1% +13.8%
LAEKEMARIAM, YOSEF K 1 82.4% +14.1%
KANG, TIMOTHY J 1 45.7% +26.8%
BENGZON, GREG C 1 57.9% +7.0%
WU, JERRY 1 68.6% +20.3%
AUGUSTINE, NICHOLAS 1 72.7% +28.2%
SOHRAB, MALICK ARIF 1 86.6% +20.8%
KIYABU, KARIN A 1 57.0% +39.8%
STANLEY, KAVITA 1 37.2% +22.6%
WEINER, ARIELLE E 1 43.6% +53.3%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18977683 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Replacing User Interface Control Mappings in Response to User Input LAEKEMARIAM, YOSEF K —
18643967 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Establishing Personal Area Network Communication Channels with Vehicle-Mounted Devices SOHRAB, MALICK ARIF —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18411630 Methods, Systems, and Electronic Devices for Monitoring User Interaction Events in Electronic Shopping Interactive Computing Environs WEINER, ARIELLE E 29d
18377780 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Presenting Potential Processor System Failure Mode Notifications JAMES, GREGORY MARK 33d
18438624 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Utilizing User Sensory Preference Reaction Scores to Enhance User Interface Interactions STANLEY, KAVITA 54d
18924784 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Presenting Delivery Data Deviation Information KANG, TIMOTHY J —
18376757 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Presenting Offered Payment Notifications on a User Interface TURK, BROCK E —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18438589 Electronic Devices, Systems, and Corresponding Methods for Utilizing User Sensory Preference Reaction Scores to Enhance User Interface Interactions KIYABU, KARIN A 16d overdue
18411630 Methods, Systems, and Electronic Devices for Monitoring User Interaction Events in Electronic Shopping Interactive Computing Environs WEINER, ARIELLE E 29d
18438624 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Utilizing User Sensory Preference Reaction Scores to Enhance User Interface Interactions STANLEY, KAVITA 54d
18737674 Electronic Device with Unitary Flexible Display and Translator and Corresponding Methods WU, JERRY 57d
19010123 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Excluding Picture-in-Picture Content from Screenshots and Screen Recordings HODGES, SUSAN E —
18977683 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Replacing User Interface Control Mappings in Response to User Input LAEKEMARIAM, YOSEF K —
18924784 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Presenting Delivery Data Deviation Information KANG, TIMOTHY J —
18657513 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Transferring Application Operations Between Devices Using Swipe Gestures AUGUSTINE, NICHOLAS —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Lenovo 13

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36892
36922
24251
26911
24441
28411
21781
24141
26261
21531

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19010123 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Excluding Picture-in-Picture Content from Screenshots and Screen Recordings Motorola Mobility LLC HODGES, SUSAN E 2425 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 05, 2025
18977683 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Replacing User Interface Control Mappings in Response to User Input Motorola Mobility LLC LAEKEMARIAM, YOSEF K 2691 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18924784 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Presenting Delivery Data Deviation Information Motorola Mobility LLC KANG, TIMOTHY J 3689 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 23, 2024
18920944 Conferencing System Terminal Devices and Corresponding Methods Facilitating Interruption of Do Not Disturb Modes of Operation Motorola Mobility LLC BENGZON, GREG C 2444 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 20, 2024
18737674 Electronic Device with Unitary Flexible Display and Translator and Corresponding Methods Motorola Mobility LLC WU, JERRY 2841 §102 Final Rejection 57d Pending Jun 07, 2024
18657513 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Transferring Application Operations Between Devices Using Swipe Gestures Motorola Mobility LLC AUGUSTINE, NICHOLAS 2178 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 07, 2024
18643967 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Establishing Personal Area Network Communication Channels with Vehicle-Mounted Devices Motorola Mobility LLC SOHRAB, MALICK ARIF 2414 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 23, 2024
18438589 Electronic Devices, Systems, and Corresponding Methods for Utilizing User Sensory Preference Reaction Scores to Enhance User Interface Interactions Motorola Mobility LLC KIYABU, KARIN A 2626 §103 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending Feb 12, 2024
18438624 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Utilizing User Sensory Preference Reaction Scores to Enhance User Interface Interactions Motorola Mobility LLC STANLEY, KAVITA 2153 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA 54d Pending Feb 12, 2024
18411630 Methods, Systems, and Electronic Devices for Monitoring User Interaction Events in Electronic Shopping Interactive Computing Environs Motorola Mobility LLC WEINER, ARIELLE E 3689 §101 Final Rejection 29d Pending Jan 12, 2024
18377780 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Presenting Potential Processor System Failure Mode Notifications Motorola Mobility LLC JAMES, GREGORY MARK 3692 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 33d Pending Oct 07, 2023
18376757 Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Presenting Offered Payment Notifications on a User Interface Motorola Mobility LLC TURK, BROCK E 3692 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2023
18132210 Electronic Devices with Multiple Energy Storage Devices, Thermal Mitigation Circuits, and Corresponding Methods Motorola Mobility LLC HENZE, DAVID V 2859 §103 Final Rejection 34d Pending Apr 07, 2023

Managing Burrus Intellectual Property Law Group's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month