Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Cantor Colburn - Sabic General

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

8 pending office actions • 1 client • 7 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Cantor Colburn - SABIC General focuses on the Chemistry & Materials technology area, leveraging the firm's broader experience of 74190 career applications. This specific profile manages 7 pending office actions, indicating a focused subset of active matters within a larger institutional framework. The firm's extensive history provides a deep context for its work in chemical and material science patents.

The firm achieves a resolved allowance rate pct of 88.07, showing success in obtaining patent grants. This performance is reached with an avg_office_actions_per_allowance of 3.16, which suggests an efficient path through the USPTO examination process. The 88.07 resolved allowance rate pct reflects the firm's effectiveness in the Chemistry & Materials field. With 74190 career applications as a foundation, the 3.16 avg_office_actions_per_allowance provides a clear expectation for the duration of the prosecution cycle. These metrics together illustrate an effective and experienced patent practice that consistently delivers results for its clients.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=74190 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.1%
Allowance Rate
n=74190
+0.55σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=74190
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=52133
-0.21σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=52133
1018 days
Time to Allowance
n=52133
+3.9pp
Interview Lift
n=74190
25.8%
RCE Rate
n=74190
2.1%
Appeal Rate
n=74190

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

74.8%
§101 Overcome
n=3210
80.4%
§102 Overcome
n=23947
80.7%
§103 Overcome
n=37287
82.0%
§112 Overcome
n=23674

Specialization & Scale

H10K, G02F, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
10%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=74190
68
Practitioners
n=74190
1091.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=74190

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (50%)
4
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (38%)
Double-patenting + other1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
88% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HESTER, HOLLEY GRACE 2 66.7% +40.8%
SERGENT, RABON A 1 55.0% +24.1%
BASS, DIRK R 1 62.4% +22.8%
DONAHUE, OLGA LUCIA 1 74.4% +12.4%
MCCULLEY, MEGAN CASSANDRA 1 58.5% +16.0%
SASTRI, SATYA B 1 62.6% +29.4%
STONEHOCKER, VIRGINIA LEE 1 82.0% +12.0%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19080211 METHOD OF PREPARING POLYMER PARTICLES AND POLYMER PARTICLES PREPARED THEREBY SERGENT, RABON A 22d
18274559 COMPOSITION OF METHACRYLATE (CO) POLYMER AND POLY(CARBONATE-SILOXANE) BLOCKCOPOLYMER AND ITS USE IN SCRATCH AND IMPACT RESITANT ARTICLES SASTRI, SATYA B 68d
18561394 WEATHERABLE POLYESTER CARBONATES COPOLYMERS FOR INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR TRAIN COMPONENTS HESTER, HOLLEY GRACE —
18038828 COMPOSITION, METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOF, AND ARTICLES PREPARED THEREFROM STONEHOCKER, VIRGINIA LEE —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18287577 SELECTIVELY PERMEABLE MEMBRANE OBTAINED BY CARBONIZATION SULFONATED POLY(PHENYLENE ETHER) COPOLYMER BASS, DIRK R 31d overdue
19080211 METHOD OF PREPARING POLYMER PARTICLES AND POLYMER PARTICLES PREPARED THEREBY SERGENT, RABON A 22d
18274559 COMPOSITION OF METHACRYLATE (CO) POLYMER AND POLY(CARBONATE-SILOXANE) BLOCKCOPOLYMER AND ITS USE IN SCRATCH AND IMPACT RESITANT ARTICLES SASTRI, SATYA B 68d
18842956 TRANSPARENT POLYCARBONATE COMPOSITIONS HESTER, HOLLEY GRACE —
18561394 WEATHERABLE POLYESTER CARBONATES COPOLYMERS FOR INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR TRAIN COMPONENTS HESTER, HOLLEY GRACE —
18281501 POLYCARBONATE COPOLYMER COMPOSITIONS FOR RAIL INTERIORS DONAHUE, OLGA LUCIA —
18281048 THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITIONS MCCULLEY, MEGAN CASSANDRA —
18038828 COMPOSITION, METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOF, AND ARTICLES PREPARED THEREFROM STONEHOCKER, VIRGINIA LEE —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
SABIC 8

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17651
17871
17791
17631
17671
17621
17661

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19080211 METHOD OF PREPARING POLYMER PARTICLES AND POLYMER PARTICLES PREPARED THEREBY Shpp Global Technologies B.V. SERGENT, RABON A 1765 §102§103 Final Rejection 22d Pending Mar 14, 2025
18842956 TRANSPARENT POLYCARBONATE COMPOSITIONS Shpp Global Technologies B.V. HESTER, HOLLEY GRACE 1787 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18561394 WEATHERABLE POLYESTER CARBONATES COPOLYMERS FOR INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR TRAIN COMPONENTS Shpp Global Technologies B.V. HESTER, HOLLEY GRACE §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 16, 2023
18287577 SELECTIVELY PERMEABLE MEMBRANE OBTAINED BY CARBONIZATION SULFONATED POLY(PHENYLENE ETHER) COPOLYMER Shpp Global Technologies B.V. BASS, DIRK R 1779 §103 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Oct 19, 2023
18281501 POLYCARBONATE COPOLYMER COMPOSITIONS FOR RAIL INTERIORS Shpp Global Technologies B.V. DONAHUE, OLGA LUCIA 1763 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Sep 11, 2023
18281048 THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITIONS Shpp Global Technologies B.V. MCCULLEY, MEGAN CASSANDRA 1767 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 08, 2023
18274559 COMPOSITION OF METHACRYLATE (CO) POLYMER AND POLY(CARBONATE-SILOXANE) BLOCKCOPOLYMER AND ITS USE IN SCRATCH AND IMPACT RESITANT ARTICLES Shpp Global Technologies B.V. SASTRI, SATYA B 1762 §103§112 Non-Final OA 68d Pending Jul 27, 2023
18038828 COMPOSITION, METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOF, AND ARTICLES PREPARED THEREFROM Shpp Global Technologies B.V. STONEHOCKER, VIRGINIA LEE 1766 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 25, 2023

Managing Cantor Colburn - Sabic General's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month