Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Clayton, Mckay & Bailey, Pc

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

20 pending office actions • 3 clients • 19 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 20 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Clayton, McKay & Bailey PC focuses on the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area, with a career history of 938 applications. The firm currently manages 20 pending office actions, reflecting their active participation in the patent process. This volume of 938 career applications establishes their experience in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field. The 20 pending office actions are a current snapshot of their ongoing prosecution work.

The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 93.91 percent across its 938 career applications. This 93.91 percent rate indicates the frequency of allowances for the applications they handle. Prosecution requires an average of 2.97 office actions per allowance. For practitioners, this 2.97 average provides a clear expectation for the number of responses needed to secure a patent. The 20 pending office actions are processed in the context of this 93.91 percent allowance rate and 2.97 office action average. These metrics provide a detailed look at the firm's performance and efficiency in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=938 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

93.9%
Allowance Rate
n=938
+0.62σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=938
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=694
-0.45σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=694
874 days
Time to Allowance
n=694
+5.7pp
Interview Lift
n=938
29.9%
RCE Rate
n=938
2.8%
Appeal Rate
n=938

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

73.3%
§101 Overcome
n=150
81.3%
§102 Overcome
n=230
83.8%
§103 Overcome
n=475
78.7%
§112 Overcome
n=253

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
53%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=938
0
Practitioners
n=938
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=938 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

20
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
8
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
5
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (5)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

11
Hard (55%)
5
Medium (25%)
4
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (15%)
§101 + other5 (25%)
§103 only5 (25%)
§112 only1 (5%)
Double-patenting only3 (15%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (15%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
15% of docket
2
Communications
10% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
14
Mechanical / Eng
70% of docket
1
Business / Other
5% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

200 h
Manual time on pending OAs
40 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
70 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY 2 83.8% +8.1%
SEREBOFF, NEAL 1 28.2% +33.3%
OBERLY, VAN HONG 1 75.2% +15.5%
SHAH, PARAS D 1 73.4% +31.0%
GARCIA, PAULO ANDRES 1 80.4% +25.1%
GIULIANI, THOMAS ANTHONY 1 76.5% +37.3%
PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN 1 28.0% +43.1%
QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 1 53.3% +34.2%
ZINK, AMANDA L 1 85.2% +3.1%
BRUCKART, BENJAMIN R 1 53.0% +32.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18748988 ANNOTATION OF A WAVEFRONT SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY 56d

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17468296 SIGNAL COLOR MORPHOLOGY EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES 14d
17461651 AUTOMATICALLY IDENTIFYING SCAR AREAS WITHIN ORGANIC TISSUE USING MULTIPLE IMAGING MODALITIES WELCH, WILLOW GRACE 20d
17361707 MAPPING EFFICIENCY BY SUGGESTING MAP POINT'S LOCATION EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT 22d
17938102 INTERACTIVE THERAPY BOOTH SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY 28d
19170306 METHODS AND SYSTEMS USING DEEP-LEARNING FOR IDENTIFYING PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION NON-RESPONDERS SEREBOFF, NEAL —
18960309 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCORING BONDING OF WIRES TO CATHETER ELEMENTS TO TRAIN AI-BASED OPTICAL INSPECTION MODEL GARCIA, PAULO ANDRES —
18906402 DEFORMATION BASED PRESSURE SENSING GIULIANI, THOMAS ANTHONY —
18787777 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING CARDIAC ABLATION PROCEDURES PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19170306 METHODS AND SYSTEMS USING DEEP-LEARNING FOR IDENTIFYING PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION NON-RESPONDERS SEREBOFF, NEAL —
19063208 Controlling Execution of Artificial Intelligence Pipelines for Data Retrieval Through Client Applications OBERLY, VAN HONG —
19063232 Adaptation to Detected Fluctuations in Outputs from Artificial Intelligence Models Over Time SHAH, PARAS D —
18960309 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCORING BONDING OF WIRES TO CATHETER ELEMENTS TO TRAIN AI-BASED OPTICAL INSPECTION MODEL GARCIA, PAULO ANDRES —
18906402 DEFORMATION BASED PRESSURE SENSING GIULIANI, THOMAS ANTHONY —
18787777 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING CARDIAC ABLATION PROCEDURES PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN —
18771539 FILTERING INTRACARDIAC ELECTROGRAMS IN THE PRESENCE OF PACING SPIKES QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT —
17749654 DISPLAYING ORTHOGRAPHIC AND ENDOSCOPIC VIEWS OF A PLANE SELECTED IN A THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANATOMICAL IMAGE BRUCKART, BENJAMIN R —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37944
37924
37963
36831
21661
26691
37151
37971
24241
21271

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19170306 METHODS AND SYSTEMS USING DEEP-LEARNING FOR IDENTIFYING PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION NON-RESPONDERS BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. SEREBOFF, NEAL 3683 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 04, 2025
19063208 Controlling Execution of Artificial Intelligence Pipelines for Data Retrieval Through Client Applications Airia LLC OBERLY, VAN HONG 2166 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 25, 2025
19063232 Adaptation to Detected Fluctuations in Outputs from Artificial Intelligence Models Over Time Airia LLC SHAH, PARAS D DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 25, 2025
18960309 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCORING BONDING OF WIRES TO CATHETER ELEMENTS TO TRAIN AI-BASED OPTICAL INSPECTION MODEL BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. GARCIA, PAULO ANDRES 2669 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18906402 DEFORMATION BASED PRESSURE SENSING BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. GIULIANI, THOMAS ANTHONY 3794 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2024
18787777 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING CARDIAC ABLATION PROCEDURES BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. PAPE, ALYSSA MORGAN 3715 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 29, 2024
18771539 FILTERING INTRACARDIAC ELECTROGRAMS IN THE PRESENCE OF PACING SPIKES BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 3797 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 12, 2024
18748988 ANNOTATION OF A WAVEFRONT BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY 3796 DP Final Rejection 56d Pending Jun 20, 2024
17971762 POSITION TRACKING FOR PULSED FIELD ABLATION BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. ZINK, AMANDA L 3794 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 24, 2022
17938102 INTERACTIVE THERAPY BOOTH Ex-Nihilo (Out Of Nothing) Inc. SCHAETZLE, KENNEDY 3796 §103§112 Final Rejection 28d Pending Oct 05, 2022
17749654 DISPLAYING ORTHOGRAPHIC AND ENDOSCOPIC VIEWS OF A PLANE SELECTED IN A THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANATOMICAL IMAGE BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. BRUCKART, BENJAMIN R 2424 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 20, 2022
17535550 AUTOMATIC ACQUISITION OF ELECTROPHYSICAL DATA POINTS USING AUTOMATED SETTING OF SIGNAL REJECTION CRITERIA BASED ON BIG DATA ANALYSIS BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. JABLON, ASHER H. 2127 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 24, 2021
17479272 ABLATING A REGION OF PATIENT ORGAN USING SELECTED ABLATION ELECTRODES OF AN EXPANDABLE CATHETER BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. LEE, DAVINA EN-YIN 3794 §103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Sep 20, 2021
17468296 SIGNAL COLOR MORPHOLOGY BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES 3792 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Sep 07, 2021
17461651 AUTOMATICALLY IDENTIFYING SCAR AREAS WITHIN ORGANIC TISSUE USING MULTIPLE IMAGING MODALITIES BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. WELCH, WILLOW GRACE 3792 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 20d Pending Aug 30, 2021
17382007 AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION OF ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES OF WIDE AREA CIRCUMFERENTIAL ABLATION POINTS BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. DHOOGE, DEVIN J 2677 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 21, 2021
17361707 MAPPING EFFICIENCY BY SUGGESTING MAP POINT'S LOCATION BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT 3792 §101§112 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jun 29, 2021
17352732 RECORDING APPARATUS NOISE REDUCTION BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. HADDAD, MOUSSA MAHER 3796 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 21, 2021
17352771 LOCAL ACTIVATION TIME ANALYSIS SYSTEM BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. MALAMUD, DEBORAH LESLIE 3792 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 21, 2021
17124679 GUI FOR HIGHLIGHTING SIGNALS PRIOR, DURING, AND POST ABLATION USING MULTI-ELECTRODE CATHETERS BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. LANCASTER, LINDSAY REGAN 3794 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Dec 17, 2020

Managing Clayton, Mckay & Bailey, Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month