Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Convergence Intellectual Property Law P.C.

Technology areas: Communications • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 5 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Convergence Intellectual Property Law P.C. has managed 171 career applications, primarily in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 87.39 percent. This performance is associated with an average of 3.79 office actions per allowance, which reflects the typical level of examiner interaction required.

Currently, the firm is handling 4 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. This active workload sits alongside the 171 career applications that define the firm's historical footprint. The 87.39 percent allowance rate provides a benchmark for the firm's effectiveness in this technical domain.

The average of 3.79 office actions per allowance suggests a consistent approach to resolving examiner inquiries. With 4 pending office actions currently in progress, the firm continues its work in the field. These metrics together illustrate the firm's experience and current activity levels.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=171 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.4%
Allowance Rate
n=171
+0.99σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=171
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=97
-0.27σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=97
997 days
Time to Allowance
n=97
+6.9pp
Interview Lift
n=171
33.3%
RCE Rate
n=171
1.2%
Appeal Rate
n=171

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

88.0%
§101 Overcome
n=25
81.8%
§102 Overcome
n=44
82.7%
§103 Overcome
n=81
84.3%
§112 Overcome
n=70

Specialization & Scale

A61F, G06Q, A61K
Top CPC Subclasses
22%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=171
1
Practitioners
n=171
171.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=171

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
1
Medium (20%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only1 (20%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
20% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, THIEN DANG 1 87.4% +11.7%
PANWALKAR, VINEETA S 1 91.1% +8.7%
LABRANCHE, BROOKE N 1 72.7% +15.7%
SNOW, BRUCE EDWARD 1 75.4% +8.0%
BARIA, DINAH N 1 72.9% +28.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19033482 METHOD FOR COMPUTING WEIGHTS FOR A BEAMFORMING ALGORITHM FROM AN INTELLIGENT REFLECTING SURFACE PANWALKAR, VINEETA S —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17973331 ABSORBABLE INTRAVASCULAR DEVICES FOR THE TREATMENT OF VENOUS OCCLUSIVE DISEASE BARIA, DINAH N 53d overdue
19073480 Neural network-based decoder architecture for 5G NGUYEN, THIEN DANG —
18093535 RADIALLY RIGID AND LONGITUDINALLY FLEXIBLE MULTI-ELEMENT INTRAVASCULAR STENT SNOW, BRUCE EDWARD —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17973331 ABSORBABLE INTRAVASCULAR DEVICES FOR THE TREATMENT OF VENOUS OCCLUSIVE DISEASE BARIA, DINAH N 53d overdue
18037313 SEGMENTED BALLOON-EXPANDABLE STENT SYSTEM FOR PRESERVATION OF THE ARTERIAL LUMEN DURING BENDING LABRANCHE, BROOKE N 12d
19073480 Neural network-based decoder architecture for 5G NGUYEN, THIEN DANG —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37742
26351
37711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19073480 Neural network-based decoder architecture for 5G Indian Institute Of Technology Madras (Iit Madras) NGUYEN, THIEN DANG §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2025
19033482 METHOD FOR COMPUTING WEIGHTS FOR A BEAMFORMING ALGORITHM FROM AN INTELLIGENT REFLECTING SURFACE Indian Institute Of Technology Madras(Iit Madras) PANWALKAR, VINEETA S 2635 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 22, 2025
18037313 SEGMENTED BALLOON-EXPANDABLE STENT SYSTEM FOR PRESERVATION OF THE ARTERIAL LUMEN DURING BENDING Efemoral Medical, Inc. LABRANCHE, BROOKE N 3771 §103 Non-Final OA 12d Pending May 16, 2023
18093535 RADIALLY RIGID AND LONGITUDINALLY FLEXIBLE MULTI-ELEMENT INTRAVASCULAR STENT Efemoral Medical, Inc. SNOW, BRUCE EDWARD 3774 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 05, 2023
17973331 ABSORBABLE INTRAVASCULAR DEVICES FOR THE TREATMENT OF VENOUS OCCLUSIVE DISEASE Efemoral Medical, Inc. BARIA, DINAH N 3774 §103§112 Non-Final OA 53d overdue Pending Oct 25, 2022

Managing Convergence Intellectual Property Law P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month