Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Crgo Global

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

19 pending office actions • 18 clients • 19 examiners • 18 art units • 0 of 19 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 35 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

CRGO Global focuses on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. Its profile lists 18 pending office actions and 1111 career applications, combining an active current docket with a meaningful historical record. This supports structured monitoring of response deadlines and recurring prosecution issues.

The resolved allowance rate is 84.76%, and the average is 3.18 office actions per allowance. Resolved matters commonly reach allowance, while the average indicates that several examination exchanges may be needed. Practitioners should use the result to inform resource planning and then assess the particular claims, references, and procedural posture in each matter.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1111 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1111
+0.60σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1111
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=834
-0.24σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=834
1049 days
Time to Allowance
n=834
+10.2pp
Interview Lift
n=1111
21.6%
RCE Rate
n=1111
10.6%
Appeal Rate
n=1111

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

77.0%
§101 Overcome
n=248
82.4%
§102 Overcome
n=359
78.1%
§103 Overcome
n=636
77.0%
§112 Overcome
n=431

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
22%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1111
1
Practitioners
n=1111
1111.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1111

Portfolio Summary

19
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

17
Hard (89%)
2
Medium (11%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (11%)
§101 + other4 (21%)
§103 only2 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)11 (58%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
5% of docket
3
Information Tech
16% of docket
4
Communications
21% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
58% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

190 h
Manual time on pending OAs
38 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
66 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
O'HARA, BRIAN M 1 75.2% +20.5%
ROGERS, ADAM D 1 82.2% +22.6%
LIEW, ALEX KOK SOON 1 87.7% +7.2%
PATTERSON, GARRETT CHRISTOPHER 1 — —
KOPPOLU, VAISALI RAO 1 79.6% +26.3%
HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M 1 76.7% +20.9%
CERIONI, DANIEL LEE 1 64.3% +28.0%
VETTER, DANIEL 1 20.3% +8.9%
MATAR, AHMAD 1 55.6% +13.9%
MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 1 48.4% +37.2%

Hard Cases (17)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17986140 BREWABLE BEVERAGE IN A COLD LIQUID WITH CONTROLLED EFFERVESCENCE LACHICA, ERICSON M 168d overdue
17619105 VENTED DIAPHRAGM REGULATOR GARDNER, NICOLE 104d overdue
18012974 BLOOD PRICKING HEAD FOR AN AUTOMATIC OR SEMI-AUTOMATIC BLOOD COLLECTION MACHINE MERRIAM, AARON ROGERS 42d overdue
18545971 ACTIVE VENTING CONTROL SYSTEM FOR HYDROGEN FUEL TANKS MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 12d
18518672 WATER SKI SEMI-RIGID BINDING SYSTEM POLAY, ANDREW 28d
18649563 MERGING OF SUPPLEMENTATIVE LIVE AUDIO TRANSFORMATION MATAR, AHMAD 76d
19489253 THERMAL MANAGEMENT AIR DUCT FOR AIRBORNE FUEL CELL SYSTEMS O'HARA, BRIAN M —
19249991 BICYCLE PEDAL WITH ELASTOMERIC SURFACE ROGERS, ADAM D —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18545971 ACTIVE VENTING CONTROL SYSTEM FOR HYDROGEN FUEL TANKS MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 12d
18649563 MERGING OF SUPPLEMENTATIVE LIVE AUDIO TRANSFORMATION MATAR, AHMAD 76d
19489253 THERMAL MANAGEMENT AIR DUCT FOR AIRBORNE FUEL CELL SYSTEMS O'HARA, BRIAN M —
19249991 BICYCLE PEDAL WITH ELASTOMERIC SURFACE ROGERS, ADAM D —
18992176 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING LOOSE WASTE COLLECTION ENCLOSURES KOPPOLU, VAISALI RAO —
18842371 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEMI-AUTOMATIC IMAGE SEGMENTATION BY USER INTERACTION LOOP LEARNING AND TRAINING METHOD THEREOF HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M —
18692797 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING THAT AN INDIVIDUAL WILL FALL CERIONI, DANIEL LEE —

Client Portfolio (18 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37912
36421
36171
26741
36331
26641
26711
36281
26931
37631

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19489253 THERMAL MANAGEMENT AIR DUCT FOR AIRBORNE FUEL CELL SYSTEMS SAS Beyond Aerospace O'HARA, BRIAN M 3642 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 01, 2025
19249991 BICYCLE PEDAL WITH ELASTOMERIC SURFACE Nine Point Eight Inc. ROGERS, ADAM D 3617 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 25, 2025
19111533 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BRINGING A VIRTUAL 3D MODEL INTO REGISTER THROUGH DISPLAY IN SEE-THROUGH Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Clermont-Ferrand LIEW, ALEX KOK SOON 2674 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 13, 2025
19069300 MODULAR GREEN ROOF SYSTEM WITH DEW WATER COLLECTION Singulargreen S.L. PATTERSON, GARRETT CHRISTOPHER 3633 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 04, 2025
18992176 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING LOOSE WASTE COLLECTION ENCLOSURES Akanthas KOPPOLU, VAISALI RAO 2664 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 07, 2025
18842371 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEMI-AUTOMATIC IMAGE SEGMENTATION BY USER INTERACTION LOOP LEARNING AND TRAINING METHOD THEREOF Clermont Auvergne Inp HAUSMANN, MICHELLE M 2671 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 28, 2024
18692797 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING THAT AN INDIVIDUAL WILL FALL Kareteq CERIONI, DANIEL LEE 3791 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 10, 2024
18650398 OPERATIONAL RESILIENCE SCENARIO SIMULATION Fusion Risk Management, Inc. VETTER, DANIEL 3628 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 30, 2024
18649563 MERGING OF SUPPLEMENTATIVE LIVE AUDIO TRANSFORMATION Nagish Inc. MATAR, AHMAD 2693 §103§112 Non-Final OA 76d Pending Apr 29, 2024
18545971 ACTIVE VENTING CONTROL SYSTEM FOR HYDROGEN FUEL TANKS SAS Beyond Aerospace MOORE, DEVON TYLEN 3763 §103§112 Final Rejection 12d Pending Dec 19, 2023
18518672 WATER SKI SEMI-RIGID BINDING SYSTEM X-Sports POLAY, ANDREW 3615 §102§112 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Nov 24, 2023
18484663 SUMMARIZATION PROCESSOR FOR UNSTRUCTURED HEALTH CARE DOCUMENTATION RECEIVED FROM OVER A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK Concord Iii, LLC NAZAR, AHAMED I 2178 §103 Final Rejection 77d overdue Pending Oct 11, 2023
18232259 COLLECTIVE CARBON EMISSIONS REDUCTION AT A PORT BY PRIORITIZING ARRIVAL FOR THE QUEUED SET OF VESSELS AND MAXIMIZING THE LOAD FACTOR FOR EACH VESSEL ENABLING SLOW STEAMING LINKED TO THE CARBON EMISSIONS TARGET OF EACH VESSEL Vltn BV LOFTIS, JOHNNA RONEE 3625 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 09, 2023
18205382 KNOWLEDGE GRAPH RESPONSIVE GENERATION OF MODEL INTERCONNECTIONS AND NEW MODELS FOR DIGITAL TWIN OPTIMIZATION OF VESSEL EMISSIONS Konnecta Systems Ike BRODERICK, BENJAMIN REEDER 2187 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 02, 2023
18034690 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING AN OPTIMAL INSERTION SEGMENT IN A BLOOD VESSEL OF A PATIENT BHEALTHCARE AHMED, TASNIM M 3783 §103 Final Rejection 45d overdue Pending Apr 29, 2023
18012974 BLOOD PRICKING HEAD FOR AN AUTOMATIC OR SEMI-AUTOMATIC BLOOD COLLECTION MACHINE BEE HEALTHCARE MERRIAM, AARON ROGERS 3791 §103§112 Final Rejection 42d overdue Pending Dec 26, 2022
17986140 BREWABLE BEVERAGE IN A COLD LIQUID WITH CONTROLLED EFFERVESCENCE Pompadour Ibérica S.A. LACHICA, ERICSON M 1792 §103§112 Final Rejection 168d overdue Pending Nov 14, 2022
17619105 VENTED DIAPHRAGM REGULATOR Liebherr-Aerospace Toulouse SAS GARDNER, NICOLE 3753 §102§103 Final Rejection 104d overdue Pending Dec 14, 2021
17233112 DEPLOYING MULTI-ENTERPRISE APPLICATIONS IN A SHARED COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT Tracelink, Inc. CHU JOY, JORGE A 2195 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 16, 2021

Managing Crgo Global's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Crgo Global's patent allowance rate?

84.8% of resolved applications prosecuted by Crgo Global were allowed, across 1,111 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Crgo Global average before allowance?

3.18 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Crgo Global have?

19 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 18 clients, before 19 examiners in 18 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month