Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Daniel Law Offices, P.A.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Daniel Law Offices, P.A. has 10 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 991 career applications. The figures show an established application record alongside a moderate current examination docket.

The resolved allowance rate is 86.96%, and successful matters average 2.51 office actions per allowance. The record therefore reflects allowance in most resolved cases, with prosecution commonly requiring more than two Office actions before resolution.

Practitioners can use the profile to set expectations for both outcome and effort. The allowance rate supports a generally favorable historical result, while the action average indicates that responses, amendments, and examiner engagement may remain necessary during prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=991 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.0%
Allowance Rate
n=991
+0.60σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=991
2.5
OAs to Allowance
n=600
-0.53σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=600
720 days
Time to Allowance
n=600
+9.8pp
Interview Lift
n=991
14.5%
RCE Rate
n=991
0.2%
Appeal Rate
n=991

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

65.2%
§101 Overcome
n=23
80.8%
§102 Overcome
n=291
81.0%
§103 Overcome
n=463
84.4%
§112 Overcome
n=270

Specialization & Scale

A63B, F41A, A47G
Top CPC Subclasses
8%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=991
1
Practitioners
n=991
991.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=991

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
4
Medium (57%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only4 (57%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
29% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, WILLIAM Y 2 48.0% +34.1%
PADUA, NICO LAUREN 1 15.4% +35.8%
LEE, MICHAEL S 1 63.1% +20.9%
STERLING, AMY JO 1 76.7% +10.5%
KISH, JAMES M 1 62.4% +11.8%
TEHRANI, DANIEL 1 60.9% +41.9%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17171784 CELLULITE AND FAT REDUCING DEVICE AND METHOD UTILIZING OPTICAL EMITTERS TEHRANI, DANIEL 20d
19453675 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING ESTATE SETTLEMENTS PADUA, NICO LAUREN —
19231119 BELT AUDIO SYSTEM LEE, MICHAEL S —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17519844 STABLE CANNABINOID FORMULATIONS LEE, WILLIAM Y 30d overdue
17171784 CELLULITE AND FAT REDUCING DEVICE AND METHOD UTILIZING OPTICAL EMITTERS TEHRANI, DANIEL 20d
19453675 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING ESTATE SETTLEMENTS PADUA, NICO LAUREN —
19231119 BELT AUDIO SYSTEM LEE, MICHAEL S —
18971940 LIGHT THERAPY DEVICE STAND STERLING, AMY JO —
18643452 LIGHT THERAPY DEVICE KISH, JAMES M —
17559155 STABLE CANNABINOID FORMULATIONS LEE, WILLIAM Y —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37922
16232
36261
36771
36311

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19453675 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING ESTATE SETTLEMENTS Securus Documents, LLC PADUA, NICO LAUREN 3626 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 20, 2026
19231119 BELT AUDIO SYSTEM Boomin Belts, LLC LEE, MICHAEL S 3677 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 06, 2025
18971940 LIGHT THERAPY DEVICE STAND Platinum Ip LLC STERLING, AMY JO 3631 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024
18643452 LIGHT THERAPY DEVICE Platinum Ip LLC KISH, JAMES M 3792 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 23, 2024
17559155 STABLE CANNABINOID FORMULATIONS Fresh Cut Development, LLC LEE, WILLIAM Y 1623 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 22, 2021
17519844 STABLE CANNABINOID FORMULATIONS Fresh Cut Development, LLC LEE, WILLIAM Y 1623 §103 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Nov 05, 2021
17171784 CELLULITE AND FAT REDUCING DEVICE AND METHOD UTILIZING OPTICAL EMITTERS BLUE WATER INNOVATIONS, LLC TEHRANI, DANIEL 3792 §103§112 Non-Final OA 20d Pending Feb 09, 2021

Managing Daniel Law Offices, P.A.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Daniel Law Offices, P.A.'s patent allowance rate?

87.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Daniel Law Offices, P.A. were allowed, across 991 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Daniel Law Offices, P.A. average before allowance?

2.51 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Daniel Law Offices, P.A. have?

7 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 6 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month