Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

17 pending office actions • 11 clients • 16 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 17 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP manages a docket in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area, with 11 pending office actions currently active. The firm has handled 339 career applications, providing a solid foundation of experience in this technical sector. Across these 339 applications, the firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 83.4 percent, demonstrating a strong capability for securing patent grants.

The firm averages 3.77 office actions per allowance, which reflects a detailed and iterative prosecution process. This average of 3.77 suggests that the firm frequently engages in that many office actions to overcome examiner rejections in the medical device field. The 11 pending office actions represent the firm's current workload as it continues this trend of persistent advocacy.

With a resolved allowance rate of 83.4 percent, the firm shows a high level of success relative to its 339 career applications. The average of 3.77 office actions per allowance indicates that clients should expect a thorough examination process. These 11 pending office actions are part of an established practice that balances technical complexity with a consistent track record of allowances.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=339 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.4%
Allowance Rate
n=339
+0.47σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=339
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=206
+0.11σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=206
1175 days
Time to Allowance
n=206
+13.2pp
Interview Lift
n=339
33.6%
RCE Rate
n=339
8.0%
Appeal Rate
n=339

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

71.7%
§101 Overcome
n=53
74.3%
§102 Overcome
n=101
73.7%
§103 Overcome
n=175
68.8%
§112 Overcome
n=109

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04N, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
28%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=339
2
Practitioners
n=339
169.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=339

Portfolio Summary

17
Total Pending OAs
11
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (41%)
7
Medium (41%)
2
Easy (12%)
1
Unknown (6%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (12%)
§103 only5 (29%)
§102 only1 (6%)
§112 only1 (6%)
Double-patenting only1 (6%)
Double-patenting + other1 (6%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (29%)
No statute on record1 (6%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
12% of docket
5
Information Tech
29% of docket
1
Communications
6% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
35% of docket
3
Business / Other
18% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

170 h
Manual time on pending OAs
34 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
59 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DOSHI, AKSHAY 2 63.7% +40.4%
MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN 1 79.2% +27.8%
ABAD, FARLEY J 1 86.3% +5.3%
PARK, JEONG S 1 80.7% +20.3%
BROWN, LUIS A 1 46.2% +31.3%
MATHEW, SEEMA 1 71.4% +26.1%
PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 1 48.6% +39.3%
SCHWARTZ, KEVIN EDWARD 1 51.3% +40.0%
HARANDI, SIAMAK 1 90.6% +7.7%
LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 1 73.7% +29.9%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18656663 PREDICTIVE DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION SYSTEM HARANDI, SIAMAK 65d
18896486 ADVANCED INTELLIGENCE ENGINE PARK, JEONG S —

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18226461 Facial Recognition Filter for Restricting Access to Photographs DHAKAD, RUPALI 28d
18885995 PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMATIC SYSTEM FOR AUDIENCE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS BROWN, LUIS A 46d
18982178 MULTISPECTRAL CAMOUFLAGE TESTING AND DEFEAT CAPABILITY MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN —
18798576 SELF-ASSEMBLING MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE AND METHODS OF FOLDING, ASSEMBLY AND DELIVERY MATHEW, SEEMA —
18759575 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RESEALING SEALANT CONTAINERS PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER —
18202165 MANAGING ADDRESSABLE ASSET CAMPAIGNS ACROSS MULTIPLE DEVICES DOSHI, AKSHAY —
18098287 MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE STRUCTURE AND DELIVERY METHOD WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18885995 PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMATIC SYSTEM FOR AUDIENCE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS BROWN, LUIS A 46d
18982178 MULTISPECTRAL CAMOUFLAGE TESTING AND DEFEAT CAPABILITY MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN —
18896486 ADVANCED INTELLIGENCE ENGINE PARK, JEONG S —
18798576 SELF-ASSEMBLING MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE AND METHODS OF FOLDING, ASSEMBLY AND DELIVERY MATHEW, SEEMA —
18759575 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RESEALING SEALANT CONTAINERS PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER —
18742933 FIRE SUPPRESSANT AGENT CONTAINER SYSTEM WITH PASSIVE COOLING SCHWARTZ, KEVIN EDWARD —
18434368 VAGINAL SPECULUM AND CERVICAL SCREENING KIT LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES —
18202165 MANAGING ADDRESSABLE ASSET CAMPAIGNS ACROSS MULTIPLE DEVICES DOSHI, AKSHAY —

Client Portfolio (11 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24222
21811
36261
37541
37521
26621
36191
24371
17741
37741

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18982178 MULTISPECTRAL CAMOUFLAGE TESTING AND DEFEAT CAPABILITY Hunamis, LLC MENDEZ MUNIZ, DYLAN JOHN §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18941243 QUALITY OF SERVICE AND STREAMING ATTRIBUTES FOR A DATA STORAGE DEVICE Streamline Data Storage, LLC ABAD, FARLEY J 2181 Other Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Nov 08, 2024
18896486 ADVANCED INTELLIGENCE ENGINE Logrhythm, Inc. PARK, JEONG S DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 25, 2024
18885995 PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMATIC SYSTEM FOR AUDIENCE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS Invidi Technologies Corporation BROWN, LUIS A 3626 §101§103 Final Rejection 46d Pending Sep 16, 2024
18798576 SELF-ASSEMBLING MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE AND METHODS OF FOLDING, ASSEMBLY AND DELIVERY Valve Medical Ltd. MATHEW, SEEMA §102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 08, 2024
18759575 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RESEALING SEALANT CONTAINERS Sashco, Inc. PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 3754 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 28, 2024
18742933 FIRE SUPPRESSANT AGENT CONTAINER SYSTEM WITH PASSIVE COOLING Williams Fire & Hazard, LLC SCHWARTZ, KEVIN EDWARD 3752 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 13, 2024
18656663 PREDICTIVE DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION SYSTEM Hunamis, LLC HARANDI, SIAMAK 2662 §103 Non-Final OA 65d Pending May 07, 2024
18434368 VAGINAL SPECULUM AND CERVICAL SCREENING KIT Viospex LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES 3619 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 06, 2024
18226461 Facial Recognition Filter for Restricting Access to Photographs Geosnapshot Pty Ltd. DHAKAD, RUPALI 2437 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jul 26, 2023
18202165 MANAGING ADDRESSABLE ASSET CAMPAIGNS ACROSS MULTIPLE DEVICES Invidi Technologies Corporation DOSHI, AKSHAY 2422 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 25, 2023
18113759 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COLORING STAIN Sashco, Inc. BHATIA, ANSHU 1774 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 24, 2023
18098287 MODULAR PERCUTANEOUS VALVE STRUCTURE AND DELIVERY METHOD Valve Medical Ltd. WOZNICKI, JACQUELINE 3774 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 18, 2023
17804040 OPTICALLY GUIDED SUPRAPUBIC CYSTOSTOMY Swan Valley Medical Incorporated RESTAINO, ANDREW PETER 3771 §103 Non-Final OA 40d Pending May 25, 2022
17531297 RNA STABILIZATION Team Medical LLC VYAS, KEYUR ANILKUMAR 1637 §102§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 19, 2021
17452161 CLOUD-BASED DECISIONING FOR ADDRESSABLE ASSET SYSTEM Invidi Technologies Corporation DOSHI, AKSHAY 2422 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 25, 2021
16165877 GENERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF IDENTITY PROFILES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF SECURITY RESPONSE Logrhythm, Inc. POPHAM, JEFFREY D 2432 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 19, 2018

Managing Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month