Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 3 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| §102 only | 1 (20%) |
| §112 only | 1 (20%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, HOANG V | 1 | 90.9% | +6.2% |
| PENG, CHARLIE YU | 1 | 75.4% | +12.9% |
| MEDICH, ANGELA MARGOT | 1 | 66.3% | +20.2% |
| CHAPEL, DEREK S | 1 | 70.1% | +21.8% |
| WASHINGTON, TAMARA Y | 1 | 81.5% | +7.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17779076 | CATADIOPTRIC MICROSCOPY | WASHINGTON, TAMARA Y | 23d overdue |
| 18750546 | RF EMITTER CHARACTERIZATION SYSTEMS | NGUYEN, HOANG V | 2d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17916714 | CHROMATIC EFFECT LIGHT REFLECTIVE UNIT | CHAPEL, DEREK S | 127d overdue |
| 18259604 | OPTICAL FILTER AND LIGHTING DEVICE TO REPRODUCE THE LIGHT OF THE SKY AND THE SUN COMPRISING THE SAME | MEDICH, ANGELA MARGOT | 67d overdue |
| 18689559 | OPTICAL FILTER AND LIGHTING UNIT COMPRISING THE SAME | PENG, CHARLIE YU | 14d |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| CoeLux | 3 |
| Applied Signals Intelligence | 1 |
| Howard Hughes Medical Institute | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2872 | 2 |
| 2845 | 1 |
| 2874 | 1 |
| 2871 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18750546 | RF EMITTER CHARACTERIZATION SYSTEMS | Applied Signals Intelligence, Inc. | NGUYEN, HOANG V | 2845 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 2d overdue | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
| 18689559 | OPTICAL FILTER AND LIGHTING UNIT COMPRISING THE SAME | Coelux S.r.l. | PENG, CHARLIE YU | 2874 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | Mar 06, 2024 |
| 18259604 | OPTICAL FILTER AND LIGHTING DEVICE TO REPRODUCE THE LIGHT OF THE SKY AND THE SUN COMPRISING THE SAME | Coelux S.r.l. | MEDICH, ANGELA MARGOT | 2871 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 67d overdue | Pending | Jun 28, 2023 |
| 17916714 | CHROMATIC EFFECT LIGHT REFLECTIVE UNIT | Coelux S.r.l. | CHAPEL, DEREK S | 2872 | Other | Non-Final OA | 127d overdue | Pending | Oct 03, 2022 |
| 17779076 | CATADIOPTRIC MICROSCOPY | Howard Hughes Medical Institute | WASHINGTON, TAMARA Y | 2872 | §103 | Final Rejection | 23d overdue | Pending | May 23, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial