Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Dority & Manning, P.A. And Joby Elevate, Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

12 pending office actions • 1 client • 12 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Dority & Manning, P.A. and Joby Elevate, Inc. has 13 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and 28426 career applications. The profile reflects ongoing prosecution in a technology area that may address transportation platforms, mechanical systems, and related commercial functionality. Its application history provides a broader context for the active matters.

The resolved allowance rate is 88.25%, with an average of 3.38 office actions per allowance. These historical measures show the recorded allowance outcome and examination activity, while the pending-action figure identifies current prosecution work. The combination supports practitioner review of both docket management and historical results without treating either as a forecast for a particular application.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=28426 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.2%
Allowance Rate
n=28426
+0.60σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=28426
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=17513
-0.15σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=17513
1010 days
Time to Allowance
n=17513
+3.4pp
Interview Lift
n=28426
28.1%
RCE Rate
n=28426
2.8%
Appeal Rate
n=28426

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

70.8%
§101 Overcome
n=1492
77.5%
§102 Overcome
n=8516
77.4%
§103 Overcome
n=14036
78.3%
§112 Overcome
n=8032

Specialization & Scale

G06F, F05D, F01D
Top CPC Subclasses
8%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=28426
60
Practitioners
n=28426
473.8
Apps / Practitioner
n=28426

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (42%)
7
Medium (58%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§101 + other3 (25%)
§103 only7 (58%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (8%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
12
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHAIKH, FARIS ASIM 1 68.8% +20.6%
MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A 1 48.5% +50.2%
WU, PAYSUN 1 65.5% +20.6%
SU, STEPHANIE T 1 67.3% +28.7%
SINGLETARY, TYRONE E 1 29.9% +27.8%
KOESTER, MICHAEL RICHARD 1 40.8% +20.5%
MIRZA, ADNAN M 1 84.6% +9.7%
SMITH, JORDAN T 1 67.0% +9.0%
KIRK, BRYAN J 1 33.9% +44.1%
ZHU, NOAH YI MIN 1 79.0% +13.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18972265 System and Method for Yaw Moment Control MIRZA, ADNAN M 3d overdue

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18907029 Vehicle Request Coordination System for Multi-Client Computing Ecosystem KIRK, BRYAN J 43d overdue
19029301 Determining VTOL Departure Time in an Aviation Transport Network for Efficient Resource Management SINGLETARY, TYRONE E 28d
19287253 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AIRCRAFT TRAJECTORY PLANNING SHAIKH, FARIS ASIM —
19274244 Systems and Methods for Seamless Feedback Between Aviation Services and Multimodal Transportation Services MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A —
19025209 Efficient VTOL Resource Management in an Aviation Transport Network KOESTER, MICHAEL RICHARD —
18891776 Avionic System with Pseudolite-Based Positioning ZHU, NOAH YI MIN —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18907029 Vehicle Request Coordination System for Multi-Client Computing Ecosystem KIRK, BRYAN J 43d overdue
19029301 Determining VTOL Departure Time in an Aviation Transport Network for Efficient Resource Management SINGLETARY, TYRONE E 28d
19287253 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AIRCRAFT TRAJECTORY PLANNING SHAIKH, FARIS ASIM —
19274244 Systems and Methods for Seamless Feedback Between Aviation Services and Multimodal Transportation Services MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A —
19263065 Unmanned Aircraft Control Using Ground Control Station WU, PAYSUN —
19051256 Cloud Service Integration with Onboard Vehicle System SU, STEPHANIE T —
19025209 Efficient VTOL Resource Management in an Aviation Transport Network KOESTER, MICHAEL RICHARD —
18891776 Avionic System with Pseudolite-Based Positioning ZHU, NOAH YI MIN —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Joby Aero, Inc. 12

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36682
36652
36261
36621
36251
36241
36671
36661
36281
36481

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19287253 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AIRCRAFT TRAJECTORY PLANNING Joby Aero, Inc. SHAIKH, FARIS ASIM 3668 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2025
19274244 Systems and Methods for Seamless Feedback Between Aviation Services and Multimodal Transportation Services Joby Aero, Inc. MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A 3626 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2025
19263065 Unmanned Aircraft Control Using Ground Control Station Joby Aero, Inc. WU, PAYSUN 3665 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 08, 2025
19051256 Cloud Service Integration with Onboard Vehicle System Joby Aero, Inc. SU, STEPHANIE T 3662 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 12, 2025
19029301 Determining VTOL Departure Time in an Aviation Transport Network for Efficient Resource Management Joby Aero, Inc. SINGLETARY, TYRONE E 3625 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jan 17, 2025
19025209 Efficient VTOL Resource Management in an Aviation Transport Network Joby Aero, Inc. KOESTER, MICHAEL RICHARD 3624 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 16, 2025
18972265 System and Method for Yaw Moment Control Joby Aero, Inc. MIRZA, ADNAN M 3667 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Dec 06, 2024
18919901 Systems and Methods for Transferring Aircraft Joby Aero, Inc. SMITH, JORDAN T 3666 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 18, 2024
18907029 Vehicle Request Coordination System for Multi-Client Computing Ecosystem Joby Aero, Inc. KIRK, BRYAN J 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Oct 04, 2024
18891776 Avionic System with Pseudolite-Based Positioning Joby Aero, Inc. ZHU, NOAH YI MIN 3648 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 20, 2024
18403874 Time Varying Loudness Prediction System Joby Aero, Inc. NGUYEN, STEVEN VU 3668 §103 Final Rejection 57d Pending Jan 04, 2024
18449476 Battery-Based Aircraft Performance and Operations Joby Aero, Inc. HINTON, HENRY R 3665 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Aug 14, 2023

Managing Dority & Manning, P.A. And Joby Elevate, Inc.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Dority & Manning, P.A. And Joby Elevate, Inc.'s patent allowance rate?

88.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Dority & Manning, P.A. And Joby Elevate, Inc. were allowed, across 28,426 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Dority & Manning, P.A. And Joby Elevate, Inc. average before allowance?

3.38 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Dority & Manning, P.A. And Joby Elevate, Inc. have?

12 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 12 examiners in 10 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month