Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Duane Morris LLP - Wright Medical Technology

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

13 pending office actions • 3 clients • 13 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 73 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

DUANE MORRIS LLP - WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY serves as a patent law firm focused on Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The firm has managed 13323 career applications, highlighting its significant experience in patent prosecution. It boasts a resolved allowance rate of 87.79 percent, which reflects its effectiveness in obtaining patent grants for its clients. This performance is a key feature of its specialized work in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The firm's track record is well-established through its application volume.

Currently, this practice group has 15 pending office actions. The firm averages 3.37 office actions per allowance, indicating the typical amount of examiner interaction required. For those in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector, the 13323 career applications and 87.79 percent allowance rate provide a clear measure of the firm's established performance. The 3.37 average office actions per allowance helps in understanding the prosecution timeline for Wright Medical Technology. These data points offer a clear perspective on the firm's operational model.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=13323 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.8%
Allowance Rate
n=13323
+0.66σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=13323
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=8373
-0.17σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=8373
1055 days
Time to Allowance
n=8373
+8.4pp
Interview Lift
n=13323
25.9%
RCE Rate
n=13323
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=13323

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

79.4%
§101 Overcome
n=1039
80.9%
§102 Overcome
n=3470
81.8%
§103 Overcome
n=5508
82.9%
§112 Overcome
n=4611

Specialization & Scale

H10K, C07F, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=13323
0
Practitioners
n=13323
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=13323 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (54%)
6
Medium (46%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (38%)
Double-patenting + other1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (54%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
62% of docket
5
Business / Other
38% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JOHNSON, GERALD 1 78.6% +9.4%
ACKUN, JACOB K 1 56.9% +3.5%
CARLSON, JOSHUA MICHAEL 1 59.1% +39.5%
SHIRSAT, MARCELA 1 73.6% +19.0%
BOLES, SAMEH RAAFAT 1 70.1% +24.2%
HU, ANN M 1 67.8% +21.6%
BLASS, PARIS MARIE 1 54.5% +39.6%
NERENBERG, RENEE FLORENCIA 1 66.7% +0.0%
MATHEW, SEEMA 1 71.4% +26.1%
FLORES, ADRIAN 1 100.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19293404 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PATIENT-SPECIFIC PROSTHESIS FOR A FRACTURED LONG BONE JOHNSON, GERALD —
19078866 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PLATE TRIAL PACKAGING ACKUN, JACOB K —
18780692 SHOULDER PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENT BOLES, SAMEH RAAFAT —
18675322 HUMERAL IMPLANT ANCHOR SYSTEM HU, ANN M —
18703819 CONVERTIBLE GLENOID IMPLANTS BLASS, PARIS MARIE —
18331470 MULTIAXIAL MODULAR STEMS FLORES, ADRIAN —
18038663 FIXATION MECHANISM FOR GLENOID IMPLANTS WILLSE, DAVID H —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18960387 ALIGNMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS CARLSON, JOSHUA MICHAEL —
18926682 HUMERAL FIXATION PLATES SHIRSAT, MARCELA —
18780692 SHOULDER PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENT BOLES, SAMEH RAAFAT —
18675322 HUMERAL IMPLANT ANCHOR SYSTEM HU, ANN M —
18703819 CONVERTIBLE GLENOID IMPLANTS BLASS, PARIS MARIE —
18369138 HUMERAL IMPLANT AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLANTING THE SAME MATHEW, SEEMA —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Stryker 11
Tornier SAS 1
Tornier 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37746
37361
37751

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19293404 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PATIENT-SPECIFIC PROSTHESIS FOR A FRACTURED LONG BONE Howmedica Osteonics Corp. JOHNSON, GERALD §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 07, 2025
19078866 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PLATE TRIAL PACKAGING Wright Medical Technology, Inc. ACKUN, JACOB K 3736 §103§112Other Final Rejection — Pending Mar 13, 2025
18960387 ALIGNMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS Wright Medical Technology, Inc. CARLSON, JOSHUA MICHAEL §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18926682 HUMERAL FIXATION PLATES Howmedica Osteonics Corp. SHIRSAT, MARCELA 3775 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18780692 SHOULDER PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENT Tornier SAS BOLES, SAMEH RAAFAT §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 23, 2024
18675322 HUMERAL IMPLANT ANCHOR SYSTEM Howmedica Osteonics Corp. HU, ANN M §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 28, 2024
18703819 CONVERTIBLE GLENOID IMPLANTS Howmedica Osteonics Corp. BLASS, PARIS MARIE §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 23, 2024
18393827 PROSTHESIS FOR A FRACTURED LONG BONE Tornier NERENBERG, RENEE FLORENCIA 3774 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 22, 2023
18369138 HUMERAL IMPLANT AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLANTING THE SAME Howmedica Osteonics Corp. MATHEW, SEEMA 3774 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 15, 2023
18331470 MULTIAXIAL MODULAR STEMS Wright Medical Technology, Inc. FLORES, ADRIAN 3774 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 08, 2023
18038663 FIXATION MECHANISM FOR GLENOID IMPLANTS Howmedica Osteonics Corp. WILLSE, DAVID H 3774 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 24, 2023
17654080 SET OF GLENOID COMPONENTS FOR A SHOULDER PROSTHESIS Howmedica Osteonics Corp. PRONE, CHRISTOPHER D 3774 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 09, 2022
17149527 FEMORAL AND HUMERAL STEM GEOMETRY AND IMPLANTATION METHOD FOR ORTHOPEDIC JOINT RECONSTRUCTION Howmedica Osteonics Corp. HOBAN, MELISSA A 3774 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 14, 2021

Managing Duane Morris LLP - Wright Medical Technology's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month