Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Entralta

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

16 pending office actions • 15 clients • 16 examiners • 15 art units • 0 of 16 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Entralta is a patent law firm specializing in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The firm has processed 789 career applications, showing a focused history of filings in its main technology area. It maintains a resolved allowance rate of 82.6 percent, which highlights its effectiveness in obtaining patent grants for its clients. This performance metric is a key indicator of its standing in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector. The firm's track record is well-established through its application volume.

The firm currently has 15 pending office actions under management. Its prosecution efficiency is reflected in an average of 2.68 office actions per allowance. This figure suggests a relatively streamlined path through the examination process. These statistics provide a comprehensive overview of the firm's experience and success, based on its 789 career applications. The 82.6 percent allowance rate and 2.68 average office actions per allowance offer a clear picture of its operational results. These data points are essential for understanding the firm's impact in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=789 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

82.6%
Allowance Rate
n=789
+0.86σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=789
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=413
-0.63σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=413
971 days
Time to Allowance
n=413
+18.3pp
Interview Lift
n=789
18.0%
RCE Rate
n=789
0.7%
Appeal Rate
n=789

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

68.9%
§101 Overcome
n=74
70.8%
§102 Overcome
n=137
74.5%
§103 Overcome
n=282
73.6%
§112 Overcome
n=280

Specialization & Scale

A61K, A61P, C07K
Top CPC Subclasses
37%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=789
0
Practitioners
n=789
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=789 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

16
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (62%)
6
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (12%)
§103 only3 (19%)
Double-patenting + other3 (19%)
Multi-statute (no §101)8 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

9
Life Sciences
56% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
38% of docket
1
Business / Other
6% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

160 h
Manual time on pending OAs
32 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
56 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GILLIGAN, CHRISTOPHER L 1 57.7% +40.0%
SCOTLAND, REBECCA LYNN 1 0.0% +0.0%
LAWSON, STACY N 1 62.2% +51.7%
CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N 1 54.5% +34.4%
ARON, KIMBERLY A 1 54.5% +35.2%
NGUYEN, SON T 1 28.9% +16.3%
ROTONDI, CONNOR JON 1 0.0% +0.0%
WHITTINGTON, JESS G 1 72.8% +17.8%
CHANG, KYUNG SOOK 1 60.4% +40.9%
SWIFT, CANDICE LEE 1 57.5% +36.0%

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19077031 AGENTIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED COMPLETION OF HEALTHCARE PROCESSES GILLIGAN, CHRISTOPHER L —
18858722 FORMULATION FOR TREATING URINARY SYSTEM DISORDERS SCOTLAND, REBECCA LYNN —
18901273 EMBEDDED INFILTRATION DEVICE LAWSON, STACY N —
18760919 AAV-MEDIATED GENE TRANSFER FOR RETINOPATHY ARON, KIMBERLY A —
18581367 HIGH EFFICIENCY PLANTER SYSTEM AND METHOD NGUYEN, SON T —
18442273 PASSIVE AEROBIC TREATMENT UNIT AND METHOD OF USE ROTONDI, CONNOR JON —
18349884 AIRWAY DEVICE PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M —
18030996 NANOPARTICLE FOR ANTI-CANCER PEPTIDES AND USES THEREOF KONOPELSKI SNAVEL, SARA ELIZABETH —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18285645 FORMULATION AND METHOD FOR TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM DISORDERS CHANG, KYUNG SOOK 86d overdue
18770847 THERAPEUTIC AGENT COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF USE, FOR TREATING, RELIEVING, OR ALLEVIATING ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N 28d
19077031 AGENTIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED COMPLETION OF HEALTHCARE PROCESSES GILLIGAN, CHRISTOPHER L —
18901273 EMBEDDED INFILTRATION DEVICE LAWSON, STACY N —
18760919 AAV-MEDIATED GENE TRANSFER FOR RETINOPATHY ARON, KIMBERLY A —
18581367 HIGH EFFICIENCY PLANTER SYSTEM AND METHOD NGUYEN, SON T —
18407211 MOBILE TRANSPORT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DELIVERING ITEMS AND SERVICES WHITTINGTON, JESS G —
18285641 BIOACTIVE PRODUCTS SWIFT, CANDICE LEE —

Client Portfolio (15 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36831
16151
36781
16751
36431
17791
36661
16131
16571
37851

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19077031 AGENTIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED COMPLETION OF HEALTHCARE PROCESSES Optrahealth Inc. GILLIGAN, CHRISTOPHER L 3683 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 11, 2025
18858722 FORMULATION FOR TREATING URINARY SYSTEM DISORDERS Watershed Medical, Inc. SCOTLAND, REBECCA LYNN 1615 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 21, 2024
18901273 EMBEDDED INFILTRATION DEVICE Waihome LLC LAWSON, STACY N 3678 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 30, 2024
18770847 THERAPEUTIC AGENT COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF USE, FOR TREATING, RELIEVING, OR ALLEVIATING ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE BIOMED INDUSTRIES, INC. CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N 1675 §102DP Final Rejection 28d Pending Jul 12, 2024
18760919 AAV-MEDIATED GENE TRANSFER FOR RETINOPATHY Oculogenex Inc. ARON, KIMBERLY A §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 01, 2024
18581367 HIGH EFFICIENCY PLANTER SYSTEM AND METHOD Meb Holdings LLC NGUYEN, SON T 3643 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 19, 2024
18442273 PASSIVE AEROBIC TREATMENT UNIT AND METHOD OF USE Waihome LLC ROTONDI, CONNOR JON 1779 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 15, 2024
18407211 MOBILE TRANSPORT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DELIVERING ITEMS AND SERVICES Bib Technologies, Inc. WHITTINGTON, JESS G 3666 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Jan 08, 2024
18285645 FORMULATION AND METHOD FOR TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM DISORDERS Watershed Medical Inc. CHANG, KYUNG SOOK 1613 §103§112DP Final Rejection 86d overdue Pending Oct 04, 2023
18285641 BIOACTIVE PRODUCTS Victor Tets SWIFT, CANDICE LEE 1657 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2023
18349884 AIRWAY DEVICE Kb Pro, LLC PINDERSKI, JACQUELINE M 3785 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 10, 2023
18306099 FORMULATIONS CONTAINING ERYTHRITOL AND COMBINATION SKIN THERAPIES Innomed Technologies, Inc. WELLES, COLMAN THOMAS 1612 §103Other Final Rejection 5d Pending Apr 24, 2023
18030996 NANOPARTICLE FOR ANTI-CANCER PEPTIDES AND USES THEREOF King'S College London KONOPELSKI SNAVEL, SARA ELIZABETH 1658 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 08, 2023
17626616 TREATMENT OF DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH PROTEIN MISFOLDING BY NERVOUS SYSTEM EXPRESSION OF AN ENZYME WHICH HAS A DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE (DNase) ACTIVITY Cls Therapeutics Limited WEN, SHARON X 1641 §103Other Final Rejection 9d Pending Jan 12, 2022
17472370 DETECTABLE ARRAYS, SYSTEMS FOR DIAGNOSIS, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME Entopsis, Inc. BUNKER, AMY M 1684 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 10, 2021
16333914 HEART CANNULA Sun Medical Technology Research GHAND, JENNIFER LEIGH-STEWAR 3796 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 15, 2019

Managing Entralta's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month