Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Goldilocks Zone Ip Law

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

10 pending office actions • 9 clients • 10 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 20 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

GOLDILOCKS ZONE IP LAW operates in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The firm has managed 578 career applications, providing a dataset for evaluating their performance in this complex field. Currently, the firm has 7 pending office actions, showing an active presence in ongoing patent negotiations.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 85.23 percent. This rate is achieved with an average of 3.48 office actions per allowance. This 3.48 average indicates a prosecution process that often requires multiple rounds of responses and amendments to satisfy examiner requirements in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector. The 85.23 percent allowance rate across 578 career applications demonstrates a strong ability to secure patent grants for their clients.

The 7 pending office actions represent the firm's current active docket. With 578 career applications, the firm has a solid foundation of experience. Clients can use the 85.23 percent resolved allowance rate and the 3.48 average office actions per allowance to understand the typical intensity and success rate of the prosecution process with this firm.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=578 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

85.2%
Allowance Rate
n=578
+0.69σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=578
3.5
OAs to Allowance
n=427
-0.18σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=427
915 days
Time to Allowance
n=427
+14.8pp
Interview Lift
n=578
23.8%
RCE Rate
n=578
0.5%
Appeal Rate
n=578

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

60.8%
§101 Overcome
n=51
77.5%
§102 Overcome
n=191
79.8%
§103 Overcome
n=346
79.2%
§112 Overcome
n=288

Specialization & Scale

A61K, Y02E, G01N
Top CPC Subclasses
12%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=578
0
Practitioners
n=578
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=578 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (70%)
2
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (10%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (20%)
§103 only2 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (50%)
No statute on record1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
60% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
10% of docket
1
Semiconductors
10% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DERUSSO, JOHN J 1 80.4% +14.0%
TOLIN, MICHAEL A 1 63.2% +27.0%
ZHAI, KYLE 1 75.0% +18.5%
TURK, NEIL N 1 51.0% +44.3%
KALLAL, ROBERT JAMES 1 60.0% +32.4%
JOHANSEN, PETER N. 1 59.3% +24.4%
COONEY, JOHN M 1 62.8% +21.1%
TRAN, KHOA NHAT 1 43.2% +53.3%
RASTOVSKI, CATHERINE T 1 67.8% +29.0%
REGLAS, GILLIAN CHELSEA 1 30.2% +41.5%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18210503 POLYURETHANE FOAM COMPOSITION CONTAINING TPU POWDER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SHOE INSOLE USING THE SAME COONEY, JOHN M 28d overdue
18028156 MINI-BRAIN STRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION METHOD THEREFOR TRAN, KHOA NHAT 10d overdue
19533100 SHOE UPPER MOLDING MOLD WITH IMPROVED MOLDING QUALITY USING LOWER MOLD AND UPPER MOLD INTERPOSED STOPPER THEREBETWEEN DERUSSO, JOHN J —
19176936 MANUFACTUREING METHOD OF LIGHTWEIGHT MELT-BLOWN HOT-MELT NONWOVEN FABRIC COMPRISING HYDROPHOBIC NANO SILICA TOLIN, MICHAEL A —
18396697 Low Mass Antigen Detecting Device TURK, NEIL N —
18281746 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING SUSCEPTIBILITY TO ANTICANCER AGENT KALLAL, ROBERT JAMES —
18088709 METHOD OF DIRECTION ESTIMATION FOR NONCIRCULAR SIGNALS VIA DECOUPLED OPTIMIZATION RASTOVSKI, CATHERINE T —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18210503 POLYURETHANE FOAM COMPOSITION CONTAINING TPU POWDER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SHOE INSOLE USING THE SAME COONEY, JOHN M 28d overdue
18028156 MINI-BRAIN STRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION METHOD THEREFOR TRAN, KHOA NHAT 10d overdue
18278121 METHOD FOR SCREENING FUNCTIONAL MATERIAL PALLIATIVE OF ALLERGY, ATOPY, AND ITCHINESS JOHANSEN, PETER N. 14d
18705916 METHOD FOR CONFIGURING OBJECT-BASED MULTIMEDIA FOR SHORT-FORM CONTENT AND DEVICE USING SAME ZHAI, KYLE 83d
19533100 SHOE UPPER MOLDING MOLD WITH IMPROVED MOLDING QUALITY USING LOWER MOLD AND UPPER MOLD INTERPOSED STOPPER THEREBETWEEN DERUSSO, JOHN J —
19176936 MANUFACTUREING METHOD OF LIGHTWEIGHT MELT-BLOWN HOT-MELT NONWOVEN FABRIC COMPRISING HYDROPHOBIC NANO SILICA TOLIN, MICHAEL A —
18396697 Low Mass Antigen Detecting Device TURK, NEIL N —
18281746 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING SUSCEPTIBILITY TO ANTICANCER AGENT KALLAL, ROBERT JAMES —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16322
17441
17451
26111
16441
17651
28571

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19533100 SHOE UPPER MOLDING MOLD WITH IMPROVED MOLDING QUALITY USING LOWER MOLD AND UPPER MOLD INTERPOSED STOPPER THEREBETWEEN Heedae Park DERUSSO, JOHN J 1744 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 06, 2026
19176936 MANUFACTUREING METHOD OF LIGHTWEIGHT MELT-BLOWN HOT-MELT NONWOVEN FABRIC COMPRISING HYDROPHOBIC NANO SILICA Heedae Park TOLIN, MICHAEL A 1745 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 11, 2025
18705916 METHOD FOR CONFIGURING OBJECT-BASED MULTIMEDIA FOR SHORT-FORM CONTENT AND DEVICE USING SAME Industry-Academic Cooperation Group Of Sejong University ZHAI, KYLE 2611 — Final Rejection 83d Pending Apr 29, 2024
18396697 Low Mass Antigen Detecting Device Korea Electronics Technology Institute TURK, NEIL N §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 27, 2023
18281746 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING SUSCEPTIBILITY TO ANTICANCER AGENT Mbd Co., Ltd. KALLAL, ROBERT JAMES §101§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 12, 2023
18278121 METHOD FOR SCREENING FUNCTIONAL MATERIAL PALLIATIVE OF ALLERGY, ATOPY, AND ITCHINESS Shebah Biotech Inc. JOHANSEN, PETER N. 1644 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Aug 21, 2023
18210503 POLYURETHANE FOAM COMPOSITION CONTAINING TPU POWDER AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SHOE INSOLE USING THE SAME Sam Bu Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. COONEY, JOHN M 1765 §103§112 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending Jun 15, 2023
18028156 MINI-BRAIN STRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION METHOD THEREFOR Sogang University Research & Business Development Foundation TRAN, KHOA NHAT 1632 §102§112 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Mar 23, 2023
18088709 METHOD OF DIRECTION ESTIMATION FOR NONCIRCULAR SIGNALS VIA DECOUPLED OPTIMIZATION Kangwon National University-Industry Cooperation Foundation RASTOVSKI, CATHERINE T 2857 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 26, 2022
18012959 METHOD FOR PREPARING COMPOSITION FOR CULTURING PANCREATIC ORGANOIDS, COMPOSITION THEREFOR, AND METHOD FOR CULTURING ORGANOIDS BY USING SAME Postech Research And Business Development Foundation REGLAS, GILLIAN CHELSEA 1632 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 26, 2022

Managing Goldilocks Zone Ip Law's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month