Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Growip Law Group LLC

Technology area: Computing & Software

18 pending office actions • 10 clients • 18 examiners • 11 art units • 0 of 18 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

GrowIP Law Group LLC operates primarily in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has managed 806 career applications, achieving a resolved allowance rate of 94.65 percent. This high rate of success is paired with an average of 2.34 office actions per allowance, indicating a relatively efficient path through the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Currently, the firm has 11 pending office actions. Practitioners can compare the allowance rate against the average office actions per allowance to evaluate the firm's prosecution strategy in the chemical arts. The firm's ability to maintain its success suggests a strong proficiency in navigating the specific requirements of Chemistry & Materials examiners. This efficiency is further evidenced by the 2.34 average office actions per allowance, which provides a predictable timeline for clients seeking patent protection. With 806 career applications, the firm maintains a focused portfolio while keeping its 11 pending office actions addressed. The combination of a high allowance rate and a low number of office actions per allowance suggests that the firm is particularly adept at drafting claims that meet examiner approval early in the process.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=806 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

94.6%
Allowance Rate
n=806
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=806
2.3
OAs to Allowance
n=601
-0.63σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=601
764 days
Time to Allowance
n=601
+5.4pp
Interview Lift
n=806
18.1%
RCE Rate
n=806
0.8%
Appeal Rate
n=806

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

88.4%
§101 Overcome
n=86
83.9%
§102 Overcome
n=211
84.4%
§103 Overcome
n=365
78.9%
§112 Overcome
n=180

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04N, G06T
Top CPC Subclasses
45%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=806
4
Practitioners
n=806
201.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=806

Portfolio Summary

18
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (50%)
8
Medium (44%)
1
Easy (6%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (11%)
§103 only5 (28%)
§102 only3 (17%)
§112 only1 (6%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (39%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
6% of docket
4
Information Tech
22% of docket
2
Communications
11% of docket
1
Semiconductors
6% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
7
Business / Other
39% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

180 h
Manual time on pending OAs
36 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
63 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J 1 83.5% +14.0%
HUYNH, LINDA TANG 1 38.4% +31.2%
AMIN, MUSTAFA A 1 64.1% +29.9%
CHEN, BIAO 1 84.6% +28.6%
ROBINSON, TERRELL M 1 83.2% +7.9%
CHAMBERS, TROY 1 60.2% +4.1%
KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K 1 72.9% +18.3%
MARI VALCARCEL, FERNANDO MARIANO 1 49.7% +20.0%
PATEL, PINALBEN V 1 89.2% +9.5%
NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 1 76.4% +10.7%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19135317 Orthopedic Screw BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J —
18956189 Systems and methods for automatically animating design elements ROBINSON, TERRELL M —
18758211 Systems and methods for prompt-based inpainting PATEL, PINALBEN V —

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18017054 Methane Reformer for the Production of Hydrogen and a Hydrocarbon Fuel WARTALOWICZ, PAUL A 52d overdue
19054880 Systems and methods for processing designs HUYNH, LINDA TANG 30d overdue
18862954 ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION DEVICE FOR ELASTIC MONO FILAMENTS FROM COTTON STAPLE FIBER YARNS IN FLEECES KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K 8d
19054883 Systems and methods for processing designs AMIN, MUSTAFA A 78d
19005753 Systems and methods for creating editable documents CHEN, BIAO —
18572051 Method for producing calcium carbonate solids from alkaline minerals PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY —
18512903 Fuel Cell Assembly WILKERSON, JORDAN PATRICK —
18209979 POWER APPARATUS, CONTROL AND INVERTERS FOR ELECTROSURGERY CLARK, RYAN T —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19054880 Systems and methods for processing designs HUYNH, LINDA TANG 30d overdue
18678209 Systems and methods for uploading content items to a server computing system NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 23d overdue
18862954 ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION DEVICE FOR ELASTIC MONO FILAMENTS FROM COTTON STAPLE FIBER YARNS IN FLEECES KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K 8d
19054883 Systems and methods for processing designs AMIN, MUSTAFA A 78d
19135317 Orthopedic Screw BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J —
19005753 Systems and methods for creating editable documents CHEN, BIAO —
18891796 Systems and methods for identifying search topics MARI VALCARCEL, FERNANDO MARIANO —

Client Portfolio (10 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21721
21941
36531
21591
26731
24591
26761
28341
37941
37711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19135317 Orthopedic Screw 41Medical AG BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 03, 2025
19054880 Systems and methods for processing designs Canva Pty Ltd. HUYNH, LINDA TANG 2172 §101 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Feb 16, 2025
19054883 Systems and methods for processing designs Canva Pty Ltd. AMIN, MUSTAFA A 2194 §101 Final Rejection 78d Pending Feb 16, 2025
19005753 Systems and methods for creating editable documents Canva Pty Ltd. CHEN, BIAO §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 30, 2024
18956189 Systems and methods for automatically animating design elements Canva Pty Ltd. ROBINSON, TERRELL M §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 22, 2024
18864614 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND CONTROL DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A REAL TIME STEERING ANGLE Traila AG CHAMBERS, TROY §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2024
18862954 ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION DEVICE FOR ELASTIC MONO FILAMENTS FROM COTTON STAPLE FIBER YARNS IN FLEECES Säntis Textiles AG KUMAR, KALYANAVENKA K 3653 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 8d Pending Nov 05, 2024
18891796 Systems and methods for identifying search topics Canva Pty Ltd. MARI VALCARCEL, FERNANDO MARIANO 2159 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 20, 2024
18758211 Systems and methods for prompt-based inpainting Canva Pty Ltd. PATEL, PINALBEN V 2673 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 28, 2024
18678209 Systems and methods for uploading content items to a server computing system Canva Pty Ltd. NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 2459 §112 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending May 30, 2024
18600679 Image enhancement Canva Pty Ltd. SATCHER, DION JOHN 2676 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 09, 2024
18572051 Method for producing calcium carbonate solids from alkaline minerals ETH ZÜRICH PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2023
18569079 Chelated Nutrients and Methods of Use Thereof Icl America Do Sul S.A. LANGEL, WAYNE A §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 11, 2023
18512903 Fuel Cell Assembly Inergio Technologies SA WILKERSON, JORDAN PATRICK §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2023
18282807 RING CYLINDRICAL CASING AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A RING CYLINDRICAL CASING OF A ROTATING ELECTROMECHANICAL APPARATUS Che-Motor AG MULLINS, BURTON S 2834 §103 Final Rejection 22d Pending Sep 19, 2023
18209979 POWER APPARATUS, CONTROL AND INVERTERS FOR ELECTROSURGERY The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois CLARK, RYAN T 3794 §102§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 14, 2023
18131140 INCIDENTAL DUROTOMY CLOSURE SYSTEM AND METHOD The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois OU, JING RUI 3771 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 05, 2023
18017054 Methane Reformer for the Production of Hydrogen and a Hydrocarbon Fuel Syzygy Plasmonics, Inc. WARTALOWICZ, PAUL A 1735 §103§112 Non-Final OA 52d overdue Pending Jan 19, 2023

Managing Growip Law Group LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month