Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Gtc Law Group Pc & Affiliates - Tufts

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

7 pending office actions • 1 client • 7 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

GTC Law Group PC & Affiliates - Tufts focuses on Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The firm shares a career application count of 1914 with its affiliates, maintaining a resolved allowance rate of 83.23 percent. On average, the firm receives 3.6 office actions per allowance during the prosecution process.

The firm currently has 6 pending office actions. The 83.23 percent allowance rate indicates the firm's success in the highly regulated biotech and pharma space. Practitioners can weigh the 3.6 average office actions per allowance against the 1914 career applications to understand the firm's experience level and typical prosecution timeline. The data is a significant metric for clients in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals, where patentability can be challenging. With 6 pending office actions currently active, the firm continues to navigate these technical fields using its established prosecution style. The firm's track record with 1914 career applications provides a solid foundation for its ongoing work in life sciences.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1914 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.2%
Allowance Rate
n=1914
+0.59σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1914
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=933
-0.04σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=933
992 days
Time to Allowance
n=933
+7.0pp
Interview Lift
n=1914
33.4%
RCE Rate
n=1914
3.6%
Appeal Rate
n=1914

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

64.3%
§101 Overcome
n=241
73.8%
§102 Overcome
n=409
76.2%
§103 Overcome
n=798
74.0%
§112 Overcome
n=420

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1914
8
Practitioners
n=1914
239.2
Apps / Practitioner
n=1914

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
2
Medium (29%)
1
Easy (14%)
1
Unknown (14%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (14%)
§112 only1 (14%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)
No statute on record1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
86% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MULVANEY, ELIZABETH EVANS 1 78.9% +15.1%
ALLEY, GENEVIEVE S 1 60.3% +48.2%
MARVICH, MARIA 1 54.9% +28.1%
JOHNSON, JENNA LEIGH 1 47.4% +19.3%
WESTERBERG, NISSA M 1 23.4% +37.1%
KIM, BRYAN 1 28.4% +36.8%
PALENIK, JEFFREY T 1 53.6% +27.2%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18360217 RAPID HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING SYSTEM TO ASSESS POTENTIAL TREATMENTS FOR SPORADIC ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE MARVICH, MARIA 87d overdue
17753312 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING AND ANALYSIS OF DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS IN VITRO WESTERBERG, NISSA M 19d overdue
18342271 SILK-BASED ARTICLES HAVING DECREASED WATER UPTAKE AND IMPROVED MECHANICAL PROPERTIES, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME JOHNSON, JENNA LEIGH 15d
18966464 MICROPATTERNED SILK-DOPAMINE ADHESIVES COMPOSITE MULVANEY, ELIZABETH EVANS —
17444293 Biopolymer-Based Preservation of Perishable Products KIM, BRYAN —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18360217 RAPID HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING SYSTEM TO ASSESS POTENTIAL TREATMENTS FOR SPORADIC ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE MARVICH, MARIA 87d overdue
17753312 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING AND ANALYSIS OF DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS IN VITRO WESTERBERG, NISSA M 19d overdue
18342271 SILK-BASED ARTICLES HAVING DECREASED WATER UPTAKE AND IMPROVED MECHANICAL PROPERTIES, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME JOHNSON, JENNA LEIGH 15d
18966464 MICROPATTERNED SILK-DOPAMINE ADHESIVES COMPOSITE MULVANEY, ELIZABETH EVANS —
18746604 SILK-BASED ARTICLES HAVING VARIABLE ACTIVE AGENT RELEASE RATES ALLEY, GENEVIEVE S —
17444293 Biopolymer-Based Preservation of Perishable Products KIM, BRYAN —
17169195 MULTI-LAYER BIOMATERIAL FOR TISSUE REGENERATION AND WOUND HEALING PALENIK, JEFFREY T —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Tufts University 7

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16171
16341
17891
16181
17921
16151

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18966464 MICROPATTERNED SILK-DOPAMINE ADHESIVES COMPOSITE Trustees Of Tufts College MULVANEY, ELIZABETH EVANS §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 03, 2024
18746604 SILK-BASED ARTICLES HAVING VARIABLE ACTIVE AGENT RELEASE RATES Trustees Of Tufts College ALLEY, GENEVIEVE S 1617 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 18, 2024
18360217 RAPID HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING SYSTEM TO ASSESS POTENTIAL TREATMENTS FOR SPORADIC ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE Trustees Of Tufts College MARVICH, MARIA 1634 §102§112Other Final Rejection 87d overdue Pending Jul 27, 2023
18342271 SILK-BASED ARTICLES HAVING DECREASED WATER UPTAKE AND IMPROVED MECHANICAL PROPERTIES, AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME Trustees Of Tufts College JOHNSON, JENNA LEIGH 1789 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 15d Pending Jun 27, 2023
17753312 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING AND ANALYSIS OF DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS IN VITRO Trustees Of Tufts College WESTERBERG, NISSA M 1618 §103§112DP Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Feb 28, 2022
17444293 Biopolymer-Based Preservation of Perishable Products Tufts University KIM, BRYAN 1792 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 03, 2021
17169195 MULTI-LAYER BIOMATERIAL FOR TISSUE REGENERATION AND WOUND HEALING Tufts University PALENIK, JEFFREY T 1615 Other Final Rejection — Pending Feb 05, 2021

Managing Gtc Law Group Pc & Affiliates - Tufts's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month