Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Heer Law

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

6 pending office actions • 6 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 18 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Heer Law has 242 career applications in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The firm currently handles 4 pending office actions. The resolved allowance rate pct is 64.03, which shows the percentage of resolved applications that have been allowed. This career volume of 242 applications indicates a focused practice within its primary technology area.

The average office actions per allowance is 2.45. This figure indicates the typical number of office actions required to secure a patent grant. With 242 career applications and a 64.03 resolved allowance rate pct, the firm's performance metrics are established for its clients. The average of 2.45 office actions per allowance serves as a guide for predicting the level of examiner interaction. The 4 pending office actions reflect the firm's current activity at the USPTO.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=242 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

64.0%
Allowance Rate
n=242
-0.04σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=242
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=89
-0.69σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=89
918 days
Time to Allowance
n=89
+23.4pp
Interview Lift
n=242
17.3%
RCE Rate
n=242
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=242

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

41.7%
§101 Overcome
n=24
47.1%
§102 Overcome
n=68
47.9%
§103 Overcome
n=94
50.0%
§112 Overcome
n=62

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06N, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
16%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=242
1
Practitioners
n=242
242.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=242

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (33%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
2
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHAN, KO HUNG 1 66.7% +15.0%
COLLINS, RAVEN 1 62.5% +10.4%
MAGAR, DIL KUMAR 1 54.8% +14.9%
FERREIRA, CATHERINE M 1 39.4% +33.3%
STOFFA, WYATT A 1 79.4% +22.8%
LEE, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 1 62.5% +25.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19183438 ADJUSTABLE FIXTURE SUPPORT MAGNET, AND RELATED SYSTEM AND METHOD CHAN, KO HUNG —
18871012 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR LIMITER DEVICES MAGAR, DIL KUMAR —
18034444 OPERATOR IMPLEMENTATIONS FOR QUANTUM COMPUTATION LEE, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19183438 ADJUSTABLE FIXTURE SUPPORT MAGNET, AND RELATED SYSTEM AND METHOD CHAN, KO HUNG —
19175908 PRODUCT HANDLE COLLINS, RAVEN —
18871012 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR LIMITER DEVICES MAGAR, DIL KUMAR —
18917519 BRASSIERE ERGONOMICALLY CONFIGURED TO BETTER SUPPORT IMPLANT-BASED AUGMENTED BREASTS FERREIRA, CATHERINE M —
18202426 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR AMPLIFYING LASER FOR NUCLEAR FUSION REACTIONS STOFFA, WYATT A —
18034444 OPERATOR IMPLEMENTATIONS FOR QUANTUM COMPUTATION LEE, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37351
36751
37321
36451

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19183438 ADJUSTABLE FIXTURE SUPPORT MAGNET, AND RELATED SYSTEM AND METHOD Kluods Construction Inc. CHAN, KO HUNG §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2025
19175908 PRODUCT HANDLE Hughes Containers Ltd. COLLINS, RAVEN 3735 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 10, 2025
18871012 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR LIMITER DEVICES Spirol Industries Ltd. MAGAR, DIL KUMAR 3675 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 02, 2024
18917519 BRASSIERE ERGONOMICALLY CONFIGURED TO BETTER SUPPORT IMPLANT-BASED AUGMENTED BREASTS Figiura Intimates Inc. FERREIRA, CATHERINE M 3732 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 16, 2024
18202426 SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR AMPLIFYING LASER FOR NUCLEAR FUSION REACTIONS Syntharise Chemical Inc. STOFFA, WYATT A 3645 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 26, 2023
18034444 OPERATOR IMPLEMENTATIONS FOR QUANTUM COMPUTATION The Governing Council of the University of Toronto LEE, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 28, 2023

Managing Heer Law's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month