Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
11 pending office actions • 4 clients • 11 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
HENNEMAN & ASSOCIATES, PLC specializes in Computing & Software with 758 career applications. The firm currently has 9 pending office actions. The resolved allowance rate pct is 88.1, which represents the success rate for its applications in the computing sector. This career volume of 758 applications demonstrates the firm's experience in navigating the specific challenges of software patenting.
The average office actions per allowance is 3.23. This figure shows the typical amount of examiner interaction needed to achieve an allowance. With 758 career applications and an 88.1 resolved allowance rate pct, the firm has a documented history of performance. The average of 3.23 office actions per allowance is a useful metric for estimating the complexity of the prosecution process. The 9 pending office actions reflect the firm's current engagement with the USPTO.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (9%) |
| §101 + other | 2 (18%) |
| §103 only | 6 (55%) |
| §102 only | 2 (18%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PATEL, MANGLESH M | 1 | 74.9% | +18.1% |
| CAREY, FORREST L | 1 | 56.5% | +54.8% |
| ALMANI, MOHSEN | 1 | 50.1% | +21.9% |
| GURMU, MULUEMEBET | 1 | 80.2% | +17.5% |
| BAYAT, ALI | 1 | 92.4% | +6.0% |
| WEBER, TAMARA L | 1 | 87.3% | +11.9% |
| LEE, MICHAEL M | 1 | 84.2% | +37.5% |
| PARK, GRACE A | 1 | 76.3% | +17.6% |
| WAN, DEMING | 1 | 76.4% | +42.4% |
| LEGGETT, ANDREA C. | 1 | 76.0% | +20.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18802630 | Hybrid Approach To Data Governance | LEE, MICHAEL M | 99d overdue |
| 18980853 | Flexible Permission Management Framework For Cloud Attached File Systems | GURMU, MULUEMEBET | — |
| 18978908 | A Framework For 3D Object Detection And Depth Prediction From 2D Images | BAYAT, ALI | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18213454 | System And Method For Allocating Digital Data According To Valu of Digital Content | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 17d overdue |
| 19094449 | Systematic Approach Towards System Identification Based Yaw Rate Estimation With Low-Cost IMU+GPS Units | PATEL, MANGLESH M | — |
| 18952107 | System And Method For Adjusting Vehicle Location | WEBER, TAMARA L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18802630 | Hybrid Approach To Data Governance | LEE, MICHAEL M | 99d overdue |
| 18487715 | User Interface Overlay System | LEGGETT, ANDREA C. | 15d |
| 19094449 | Systematic Approach Towards System Identification Based Yaw Rate Estimation With Low-Cost IMU+GPS Units | PATEL, MANGLESH M | — |
| 19027678 | Systems and Methods for Uploading Streamed Objects to a Cloud Storage System | CAREY, FORREST L | — |
| 19026230 | System And Method For Synchronizing File Systems With Large Namespaces | ALMANI, MOHSEN | — |
| 18980853 | Flexible Permission Management Framework For Cloud Attached File Systems | GURMU, MULUEMEBET | — |
| 18952107 | System And Method For Adjusting Vehicle Location | WEBER, TAMARA L | — |
| 18738830 | System and Method for Sensitive Content Analysis Prioritization Based on File Metadata | PARK, GRACE A | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Egnyte | 6 |
| Ridecell, Inc. | 3 |
| Thermal Storage Systems | 1 |
| Incisive Software Corporation | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2491 | 1 |
| 2159 | 1 |
| 2163 | 1 |
| 3667 | 1 |
| 2436 | 1 |
| 3762 | 1 |
| 2171 | 1 |
| 3625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19094449 | Systematic Approach Towards System Identification Based Yaw Rate Estimation With Low-Cost IMU+GPS Units | Ridecell, Inc. | PATEL, MANGLESH M | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 28, 2025 | |
| 19027678 | Systems and Methods for Uploading Streamed Objects to a Cloud Storage System | Egnyte, Inc. | CAREY, FORREST L | 2491 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
| 19026230 | System And Method For Synchronizing File Systems With Large Namespaces | Egnyte, Inc. | ALMANI, MOHSEN | 2159 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 16, 2025 |
| 18980853 | Flexible Permission Management Framework For Cloud Attached File Systems | Egnyte, Inc. | GURMU, MULUEMEBET | 2163 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 13, 2024 |
| 18978908 | A Framework For 3D Object Detection And Depth Prediction From 2D Images | Ridecell, Inc. | BAYAT, ALI | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 12, 2024 | |
| 18952107 | System And Method For Adjusting Vehicle Location | Ridecell, Inc. | WEBER, TAMARA L | 3667 | §101§102§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
| 18802630 | Hybrid Approach To Data Governance | Egnyte, Inc. | LEE, MICHAEL M | 2436 | §102Other | Final Rejection | 99d overdue | Pending | Aug 13, 2024 |
| 18738830 | System and Method for Sensitive Content Analysis Prioritization Based on File Metadata | Egnyte, Inc. | PARK, GRACE A | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 10, 2024 | |
| 18658278 | System And Method For Collecting Solar Energy With A Stationary Thermal Storage Device | Thermal Storage Systems | WAN, DEMING | 3762 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 08, 2024 |
| 18487715 | User Interface Overlay System | Incisive Software Corporation | LEGGETT, ANDREA C. | 2171 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Oct 16, 2023 |
| 18213454 | System And Method For Allocating Digital Data According To Valu of Digital Content | Egnyte, Inc. | IQBAL, MUSTAFA | 3625 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 17d overdue | Pending | Jun 23, 2023 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial