Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hickman Becker Bingham Ledesma LLP

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

7 pending office actions • 6 clients • 7 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

HICKMAN BECKER BINGHAM LEDESMA LLP has 2977 career applications in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The firm currently manages 4 pending office actions. The resolved allowance rate pct is 90.36, representing the success rate for its resolved applications. This history of 2977 applications provides a significant baseline for evaluating the firm's performance in these technical fields.

The average office actions per allowance is 4.46. This figure indicates that the prosecution process involves multiple rounds of examiner interaction before an allowance is reached. With 2977 career applications and a 90.36 resolved allowance rate pct, the firm demonstrates a consistent ability to secure patent rights. The average of 4.46 office actions per allowance helps practitioners plan for the duration of the prosecution cycle. The 4 pending office actions reflect the firm's current activity at the USPTO.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2977 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.4%
Allowance Rate
n=2977
+0.71σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2977
4.5
OAs to Allowance
n=1996
+0.37σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1996
1229 days
Time to Allowance
n=1996
+4.9pp
Interview Lift
n=2977
41.5%
RCE Rate
n=2977
2.7%
Appeal Rate
n=2977

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

88.3%
§101 Overcome
n=725
88.5%
§102 Overcome
n=711
88.2%
§103 Overcome
n=1301
88.4%
§112 Overcome
n=619

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
55%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2977
1
Practitioners
n=2977
2977.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=2977

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§101 + other4 (57%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
14% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ELCHANTI, ZEINA 1 64.3% +25.0%
JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE 1 68.8% +22.0%
WORKU, KIDEST 1 84.9% +2.8%
LEE, JENNIFER V 1 25.1% +39.7%
COLLINS, GARY 1 83.2% +15.5%
EL-BATHY, IBRAHIM N 1 52.0% +46.4%
STEINBERG, AMANDA L 1 51.3% +27.0%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18374919 HELPING PROSPECTIVE MOVERS INTERACTIVELY DISCOVER AND EXPLORE PERSONALIZED LIVING LOCATIONS EL-BATHY, IBRAHIM N 147d overdue
19330788 Systems and Methods for Computer Memory Optimization for the Storage of Delivery Time Information for a Product Sold Online ELCHANTI, ZEINA —
19182262 INTEGRATED VEHICLE ACCESS AND USAGE TRACKING SYSTEM JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE —
18807944 CONFIGURATION METHOD FOR A POWER SUPPLY CONTROLLER AND A CONTROLLER EMPLOYING SAME WORKU, KIDEST —
18608911 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE FOR UPLOADING IMAGE DATA AND APPROVING SEGMENTED IMAGE DATA LEE, JENNIFER V —
18608919 LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR PROCESSING ANATOMICAL MODELS COLLINS, GARY —
18136545 MONITORING USERS WITH A MOBILE DEVICE WHILE THE USERS ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES STEINBERG, AMANDA L —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18374919 HELPING PROSPECTIVE MOVERS INTERACTIVELY DISCOVER AND EXPLORE PERSONALIZED LIVING LOCATIONS EL-BATHY, IBRAHIM N 147d overdue
19330788 Systems and Methods for Computer Memory Optimization for the Storage of Delivery Time Information for a Product Sold Online ELCHANTI, ZEINA —
19182262 INTEGRATED VEHICLE ACCESS AND USAGE TRACKING SYSTEM JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE —
18608911 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE FOR UPLOADING IMAGE DATA AND APPROVING SEGMENTED IMAGE DATA LEE, JENNIFER V —
18608919 LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR PROCESSING ANATOMICAL MODELS COLLINS, GARY —
18136545 MONITORING USERS WITH A MOBILE DEVICE WHILE THE USERS ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES STEINBERG, AMANDA L —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36282
36991
36881
21151
37921

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19330788 Systems and Methods for Computer Memory Optimization for the Storage of Delivery Time Information for a Product Sold Online Deliverr, Inc. ELCHANTI, ZEINA 3628 §101§102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 16, 2025
19182262 INTEGRATED VEHICLE ACCESS AND USAGE TRACKING SYSTEM Standard Fleet, Inc. JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE 3699 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 17, 2025
18807944 CONFIGURATION METHOD FOR A POWER SUPPLY CONTROLLER AND A CONTROLLER EMPLOYING SAME Rohm Co., Ltd. WORKU, KIDEST §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 17, 2024
18608911 SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE FOR UPLOADING IMAGE DATA AND APPROVING SEGMENTED IMAGE DATA Ricoh Company, Ltd. LEE, JENNIFER V 3688 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 18, 2024
18608919 LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR PROCESSING ANATOMICAL MODELS Ricoh Company, Ltd. COLLINS, GARY 2115 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 18, 2024
18374919 HELPING PROSPECTIVE MOVERS INTERACTIVELY DISCOVER AND EXPLORE PERSONALIZED LIVING LOCATIONS Where Might I Live LLP EL-BATHY, IBRAHIM N 3628 §101 Non-Final OA 147d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2023
18136545 MONITORING USERS WITH A MOBILE DEVICE WHILE THE USERS ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES Alexander F. Castellanos STEINBERG, AMANDA L 3792 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 19, 2023

Managing Hickman Becker Bingham Ledesma LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month