Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hopewell Ip, P.C.

Technology area: Computing & Software

13 pending office actions • 1 client • 13 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Hopewell IP, P.C. specializes in Computing & Software with 96 career applications. The firm currently has 6 pending office actions. The resolved allowance rate pct is 100.0, which represents the success rate for its resolved applications in the computing sector. This career volume of 96 applications indicates a highly specialized practice in the software sector.

The average office actions per allowance is 2.47. This figure shows the typical amount of examiner interaction needed to achieve an allowance. With 96 career applications and a 100.0 resolved allowance rate pct, the firm has a documented history of performance. The average of 2.47 office actions per allowance is a useful metric for estimating the complexity of the prosecution process. The 6 pending office actions reflect the firm's current workload in its primary technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=96 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

100.0%
Allowance Rate
n=96
+0.72σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=96
2.5
OAs to Allowance
n=43
-0.88σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=43
979 days
Time to Allowance
n=43
+0.0pp
Interview Lift
n=96
41.9%
RCE Rate
n=96
5.2%
Appeal Rate
n=96

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

43.5%
§101 Overcome
n=23
—
§102 Overcome
n=11 (min 20)
61.3%
§103 Overcome
n=31
—
§112 Overcome
n=14 (min 20)

Specialization & Scale

G06N, G06F, G06V
Top CPC Subclasses
92%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=96
1
Practitioners
n=96
96.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=96

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

11
Hard (85%)
2
Medium (15%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§101 + other6 (46%)
§103 only1 (8%)
§102 only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (31%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
46% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
7
Business / Other
54% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEMMA, SAMSON B 1 88.2% +11.2%
MORRIS, JOHN J 1 61.4% +20.4%
BHATNAGAR, ANAND P 1 91.6% +2.1%
TONG, JUSTIN CHE-CHUN 1 45.5% +32.7%
RAWLINGS, ZANE ALEXANDER 1 — —
FIGUEROA, KEVIN W 1 70.2% +20.7%
RUTTEN, JAMES D 1 63.3% +37.7%
KIM, JONATHAN J 1 63.6% +50.0%
WONG, WILLIAM 1 30.7% +27.8%
SHALU, ZELALEM W 1 31.6% +20.4%

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17405939 TWO-HEADED ATTENTION FUSED AUTOENCODER FOR CONTEXT-AWARE RECOMMENDATION ALSHAHARI, SADIK AHMED 5d
19209181 IDENTIFYING AND MITIGATING DISPARATE GROUP IMPACT IN DIFFERENTIAL-PRIVACY MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS LEMMA, SAMSON B —
18988381 WEAKLY SUPERVISED ACTION SELECTION LEARNING IN VIDEO BHATNAGAR, ANAND P —
18738557 MODEL EVALUATION METRICS AND EFFECTIVE MODEL SELECTION RAWLINGS, ZANE ALEXANDER —
18672874 CONTEXT OPTIMIZATION FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION FIGUEROA, KEVIN W —
18618757 CALIBRATED MODEL INTERVENTION WITH CONFORMAL THRESHOLD RUTTEN, JAMES D —
18425822 SEMI-LOCAL MODEL IMPORTANCE IN FEATURE SPACE KIM, JONATHAN J —
18206395 MODEL DISTILLATION FOR REDUCING ITERATIONS OF NON-AUTOREGRESSIVE DECODERS WONG, WILLIAM —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19058668 MULTI-TABLE DATA STORAGE WITH AUDITABLE DATA CHANGES MORRIS, JOHN J 73d overdue
19209181 IDENTIFYING AND MITIGATING DISPARATE GROUP IMPACT IN DIFFERENTIAL-PRIVACY MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS LEMMA, SAMSON B —
18903771 OPTIMIZING THROUGHPUT OF MACHINE-LEARNING APPLICATIONS TONG, JUSTIN CHE-CHUN —
18672874 CONTEXT OPTIMIZATION FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION FIGUEROA, KEVIN W —
18618757 CALIBRATED MODEL INTERVENTION WITH CONFORMAL THRESHOLD RUTTEN, JAMES D —
18425822 SEMI-LOCAL MODEL IMPORTANCE IN FEATURE SPACE KIM, JONATHAN J —
18206395 MODEL DISTILLATION FOR REDUCING ITERATIONS OF NON-AUTOREGRESSIVE DECODERS WONG, WILLIAM —
17969238 DISTANCE-BASED PAIR LOSS FOR COLLABORATIVE FILTERING SHALU, ZELALEM W —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 13

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21521
21441
21451
21001
21261
21211

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19209181 IDENTIFYING AND MITIGATING DISPARATE GROUP IMPACT IN DIFFERENTIAL-PRIVACY MACHINE-LEARNED MODELS The Toronto-Dominion Bank LEMMA, SAMSON B §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 15, 2025
19058668 MULTI-TABLE DATA STORAGE WITH AUDITABLE DATA CHANGES The Toronto-Dominion Bank MORRIS, JOHN J 2152 §103 Final Rejection 73d overdue Pending Feb 20, 2025
18988381 WEAKLY SUPERVISED ACTION SELECTION LEARNING IN VIDEO The Toronto-Dominion Bank BHATNAGAR, ANAND P §101DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2024
18903771 OPTIMIZING THROUGHPUT OF MACHINE-LEARNING APPLICATIONS The Toronto-Dominion Bank TONG, JUSTIN CHE-CHUN §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 01, 2024
18738557 MODEL EVALUATION METRICS AND EFFECTIVE MODEL SELECTION The Toronto-Dominion Bank RAWLINGS, ZANE ALEXANDER §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 10, 2024
18672874 CONTEXT OPTIMIZATION FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION The Toronto-Dominion Bank FIGUEROA, KEVIN W §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2024
18618757 CALIBRATED MODEL INTERVENTION WITH CONFORMAL THRESHOLD The Toronto-Dominion Bank RUTTEN, JAMES D §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2024
18425822 SEMI-LOCAL MODEL IMPORTANCE IN FEATURE SPACE The Toronto-Dominion Bank KIM, JONATHAN J §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 29, 2024
18206395 MODEL DISTILLATION FOR REDUCING ITERATIONS OF NON-AUTOREGRESSIVE DECODERS The Toronto-Dominion Bank WONG, WILLIAM 2144 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 06, 2023
17969238 DISTANCE-BASED PAIR LOSS FOR COLLABORATIVE FILTERING The Toronto-Dominion Bank SHALU, ZELALEM W 2145 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 19, 2022
17968653 TRANSLATION MODEL WITH LEARNED POSITION AND CORRECTIVE LOSS The Toronto-Dominion Bank KIM, SEHWAN 2100 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 18, 2022
17485837 HORIZON-AWARE CUMULATIVE ACCESSIBILITY ESTIMATION The Toronto-Dominion Bank MANG, VAN C 2126 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2021
17405939 TWO-HEADED ATTENTION FUSED AUTOENCODER FOR CONTEXT-AWARE RECOMMENDATION The Toronto-Dominion Bank ALSHAHARI, SADIK AHMED 2121 §103§112 Final Rejection 5d Pending Aug 18, 2021

Managing Hopewell Ip, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month