Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Hopewell Ip, P.C.

6 pending office actions • 2 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (17%)
5
Medium (83%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (17%)
§103 only5 (83%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
6
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOANG, SON T 2 83.4% +35.0%
MORRIS, JOHN J 1 60.9% +19.7%
UDDIN, MD I 1 77.3% +73.5%
WATHEN, BRIAN W 1 84.1% +15.8%
ALSHAHARI, SADIK AHMED 1 32.4% +45.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19209870 LOCAL CONTEXT FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION HOANG, SON T 2d overdue
19209875 LOCAL CONTEXT FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION HOANG, SON T 2d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17735884 LOW-DIMENSIONAL PROBABILISTIC DENSITY OF HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATA MANIFOLD WATHEN, BRIAN W 29d

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19058668 MULTI-TABLE DATA STORAGE WITH AUDITABLE DATA CHANGES MORRIS, JOHN J 73d overdue
19209870 LOCAL CONTEXT FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION HOANG, SON T 2d overdue
19209875 LOCAL CONTEXT FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION HOANG, SON T 2d overdue
17405939 TWO-HEADED ATTENTION FUSED AUTOENCODER FOR CONTEXT-AWARE RECOMMENDATION ALSHAHARI, SADIK AHMED 5d
17735884 LOW-DIMENSIONAL PROBABILISTIC DENSITY OF HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATA MANIFOLD WATHEN, BRIAN W 29d
17987761 SHARED MODEL TRAINING WITH PRIVACY PROTECTIONS UDDIN, MD I 55d

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 5
Hamid R. Tizhoosh 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21693
21521
21511
21211

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19209870 LOCAL CONTEXT FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION The Toronto-Dominion Bank HOANG, SON T 2169 §103 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending May 16, 2025
19209875 LOCAL CONTEXT FOR CONTEXT-BASED TABULAR CLASSIFICATION The Toronto-Dominion Bank HOANG, SON T 2169 §103 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending May 16, 2025
19058668 MULTI-TABLE DATA STORAGE WITH AUDITABLE DATA CHANGES The Toronto-Dominion Bank MORRIS, JOHN J 2152 §103 Non-Final OA 73d overdue Pending Feb 20, 2025
17987761 SHARED MODEL TRAINING WITH PRIVACY PROTECTIONS Hamid R. Tizhoosh UDDIN, MD I 2169 §103 Final Rejection 55d Pending Nov 15, 2022
17735884 LOW-DIMENSIONAL PROBABILISTIC DENSITY OF HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DATA MANIFOLD The Toronto-Dominion Bank WATHEN, BRIAN W 2151 §101 Final Rejection 29d Pending May 03, 2022
17405939 TWO-HEADED ATTENTION FUSED AUTOENCODER FOR CONTEXT-AWARE RECOMMENDATION The Toronto-Dominion Bank ALSHAHARI, SADIK AHMED 2121 §103 Non-Final OA 5d Pending Aug 18, 2021

Managing Hopewell Ip, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month