Technology areas: Computing & Software • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
6 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
IP Attorneys Group, LLC focuses on Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and has 746 career applications recorded. Its resolved allowance rate is 95.73%, showing a high allowance outcome among resolved matters in the dataset.
The profile lists 6 pending office actions, which represents the active examination workload shown here. Allowed matters required an average of 1.43 office actions, indicating a relatively limited response cycle for matters that reached allowance. For practitioners, the combination of a high resolved allowance rate and a low office-action average provides useful context for evaluating prosecution execution in this technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (17%) |
| §103 only | 1 (17%) |
| §112 only | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRANGE, SHARON M | 1 | 54.2% | +46.8% |
| ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M | 1 | 84.1% | +2.6% |
| HOPKINS, ROBERT A | 1 | 84.5% | +7.6% |
| LYNCH, MEGAN E | 1 | 38.1% | +39.7% |
| KIM, EUNHEE | 1 | 77.3% | +12.2% |
| BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA | 1 | 20.0% | +63.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18864695 | AN AUTOMATED AIR FILTRATION SYSTEM FOR CONTINOUS REMOVAL OF AEROSOLS | HOPKINS, ROBERT A | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18892851 | VAMP CONSTRUCTION AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTING THE SAME | LYNCH, MEGAN E | 36d overdue |
| 19210270 | Interchangeable Foreparts for Shoes | PRANGE, SHARON M | 26d overdue |
| 17773649 | PELVIC FLOOR PROBE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE EXERCISE | BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA | 20d |
| 18992047 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING RESPONSIVE, COST-EFFECTIVE IMMUTABILITY AND DATA INTEGRITY VALIDATION IN CLOUD AND DISTRIBUTED STORAGE SYSTEMS USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGER AND SMART CONTRACT TECHNOLOGY | ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18892851 | VAMP CONSTRUCTION AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTING THE SAME | LYNCH, MEGAN E | 36d overdue |
| 19210270 | Interchangeable Foreparts for Shoes | PRANGE, SHARON M | 26d overdue |
| 17773649 | PELVIC FLOOR PROBE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE EXERCISE | BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA | 20d |
| 18021212 | Method for Extracting Attributes of Starting and Ending Points of Roads in Batches From Urban Regional Road Network | KIM, EUNHEE | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Columbia Insurance | 2 |
| Nansen Pty Ltd. | 1 |
| Enbioadvice Pty Ltd. | 1 |
| Chang'An University | 1 |
| X6 Innovations | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3732 | 2 |
| 2164 | 1 |
| 1776 | 1 |
| 2188 | 1 |
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19210270 | Interchangeable Foreparts for Shoes | Columbia Insurance Company | PRANGE, SHARON M | 3732 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 26d overdue | Pending | May 16, 2025 |
| 18992047 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING RESPONSIVE, COST-EFFECTIVE IMMUTABILITY AND DATA INTEGRITY VALIDATION IN CLOUD AND DISTRIBUTED STORAGE SYSTEMS USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGER AND SMART CONTRACT TECHNOLOGY | Nansen Pty Ltd. | ORTIZ DITREN, BELIX M | 2164 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 07, 2025 |
| 18864695 | AN AUTOMATED AIR FILTRATION SYSTEM FOR CONTINOUS REMOVAL OF AEROSOLS | Enbioadvice Pty Ltd. | HOPKINS, ROBERT A | 1776 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 11, 2024 |
| 18892851 | VAMP CONSTRUCTION AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTING THE SAME | Columbia Insurance Company | LYNCH, MEGAN E | 3732 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 36d overdue | Pending | Sep 23, 2024 |
| 18021212 | Method for Extracting Attributes of Starting and Ending Points of Roads in Batches From Urban Regional Road Network | Chang'An University | KIM, EUNHEE | 2188 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 14, 2023 |
| 17773649 | PELVIC FLOOR PROBE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING PELVIC FLOOR MUSCLE EXERCISE | X6 Innovations | BALAJI, KAVYA SHOBANA | 3791 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 20d | Pending | May 02, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial95.7% of resolved applications prosecuted by Ip Attorneys Group, LLC were allowed, across 746 applications in USPTO records.
1.43 office actions per allowed application on average.
6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 5 clients, before 6 examiners in 5 art units.
