Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 4 examiners • 2 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (60%) |
| §112 only | 2 (40%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PREGLER, SHARON | 2 | 78.2% | +20.8% |
| HSU, BAILOR CHIA-JONG | 1 | 89.6% | +4.3% |
| PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER | 1 | 51.6% | +62.5% |
| OGUNTADE, ELIZABETH BISOLA | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18787936 | NETWORK-ON-CHIP REGION-BASED ROUTING TABLE GENERATION METHOD | HSU, BAILOR CHIA-JONG | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17781697 | OPTICAL METHOD FOR DETECTING A TARGET MOLECULE BY MEANS OF THE AMPLIFICATION IN THE INTERFERENCE RESPONSE, RESULTING FROM THE REFRACTIVE INDEX AND DISPERSION | OGUNTADE, ELIZABETH BISOLA | 23d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18729502 | DOSING DEVICE FOR A FOOD DISPENSER | PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER | 11d overdue |
| 18740982 | Gas Purification Apparatus with Eductors | PREGLER, SHARON | — |
| 18741115 | Gas Purification Apparatus with Eductor Reduction Unit and Method | PREGLER, SHARON | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Streamline Innovations Inc. | 2 |
| SkyeChip | 1 |
| KIBUS PETCARE, S.L. | 1 |
| BIO OPTICAL DETECTION, S.L. | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3754 | 1 |
| 1677 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18787936 | NETWORK-ON-CHIP REGION-BASED ROUTING TABLE GENERATION METHOD | Skyechip Berhad | HSU, BAILOR CHIA-JONG | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 29, 2024 | |
| 18729502 | DOSING DEVICE FOR A FOOD DISPENSER | Kibus Petcare, S.L. | PATTERSON, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER | 3754 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 11d overdue | Pending | Jul 16, 2024 |
| 18740982 | Gas Purification Apparatus with Eductors | Streamline Innovations Inc. | PREGLER, SHARON | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 12, 2024 | |
| 18741115 | Gas Purification Apparatus with Eductor Reduction Unit and Method | Streamline Innovations Inc. | PREGLER, SHARON | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 12, 2024 | |
| 17781697 | OPTICAL METHOD FOR DETECTING A TARGET MOLECULE BY MEANS OF THE AMPLIFICATION IN THE INTERFERENCE RESPONSE, RESULTING FROM THE REFRACTIVE INDEX AND DISPERSION | BIO OPTICAL DETECTION, S.L. | OGUNTADE, ELIZABETH BISOLA | 1677 | §112 | Final Rejection | 23d | Pending | Jun 01, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial