Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Keller Schneider Patent-Und Markenanwalte

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 8 clients • 10 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Keller Schneider Patent-und Markenanwalte specializes in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems, with 75 career applications. The firm has a resolved allowance rate pct of 84.21. There are 9 pending office actions currently in progress. The 84.21 resolved allowance rate pct reflects the firm's success in securing grants for its clients. The 9 pending office actions are fewer than the 75 career applications.

The firm sees an average of 2.63 office actions per allowance. This metric, combined with the 84.21 resolved allowance rate pct, provides a snapshot of the firm's performance in its technology area. With 75 career applications, the firm has an established presence. The 2.63 avg office actions per allowance suggests a level of interaction with the USPTO is typical for their cases. Practitioners can use these figures to understand the typical path to allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=75 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

84.2%
Allowance Rate
n=75
+0.48σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=75
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=48
-0.43σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=48
965 days
Time to Allowance
n=48
+12.4pp
Interview Lift
n=75
22.8%
RCE Rate
n=75
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=75

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=2 (min 20)
64.5%
§102 Overcome
n=31
58.3%
§103 Overcome
n=48
64.6%
§112 Overcome
n=48

Specialization & Scale

B64C, F16K, A61B
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=75
0
Practitioners
n=75
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=75 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 7 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (50%)
5
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (10%)
§103 only5 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
30% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
1
Business / Other
10% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COHEN, STEFANIE J 1 75.4% +2.5%
SMITH, CHAIM A 1 39.2% +51.2%
ROSEN, ERIC J 1 41.3% +22.8%
TRAN, JULIA C 1 62.5% +31.9%
YOO, REGINA M 1 63.8% +6.1%
BUFFINGTON, HEAVEN RICHELLE 1 83.6% +13.4%
TURNER, SONJI 1 73.8% +20.1%
RAILEY, JENNIFER A 1 79.5% +8.1%
LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT 1 64.1% +33.8%
WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J 1 42.3% +40.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18282129 MULTI-MATERIAL RAIL PAD AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME BUFFINGTON, HEAVEN RICHELLE 2d overdue

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18524324 MOWER KNIFE DEVICE TRAN, JULIA C 53d overdue
18277951 Air Treatment Device TURNER, SONJI 5d
18564759 System for disinfecting skin tissue around catheters YOO, REGINA M —
18029904 Device for Decoupling and for Vibration Control LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT —
18017055 LASER WELDING METHOD FOR JOINING A NON-SINTERED MATERIAL TO A SINTERED MATERIAL, COMPOSITE BODY, AND USE OF A LASER WELDING METHOD WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18524324 MOWER KNIFE DEVICE TRAN, JULIA C 53d overdue
18566331 INTERDENTAL BRUSH HAVING AN OVAL WIRE CROSS SECTION, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME ROSEN, ERIC J 37d overdue
18282129 MULTI-MATERIAL RAIL PAD AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME BUFFINGTON, HEAVEN RICHELLE 2d overdue
18277951 Air Treatment Device TURNER, SONJI 5d
18566655 Container for the preparation of a liquid foodstuff SMITH, CHAIM A —
18029904 Device for Decoupling and for Vibration Control LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT —
18017055 LASER WELDING METHOD FOR JOINING A NON-SINTERED MATERIAL TO A SINTERED MATERIAL, COMPOSITE BODY, AND USE OF A LASER WELDING METHOD WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17911
37721
36711
17581
36151
17761
36761
36791
37611

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18574733 Recyclable material Fluidsolids AG COHEN, STEFANIE J §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 27, 2023
18566655 Container for the preparation of a liquid foodstuff Fluidsolids AG SMITH, CHAIM A 1791 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 04, 2023
18566331 INTERDENTAL BRUSH HAVING AN OVAL WIRE CROSS SECTION, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME Curaden AG ROSEN, ERIC J 3772 §103 Final Rejection 37d overdue Pending Dec 01, 2023
18524324 MOWER KNIFE DEVICE Wepfer Technics AG TRAN, JULIA C 3671 §102§103 Final Rejection 53d overdue Pending Nov 30, 2023
18564759 System for disinfecting skin tissue around catheters Aseptuva AG YOO, REGINA M 1758 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 28, 2023
18282129 MULTI-MATERIAL RAIL PAD AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALE DE LAUSANNE BUFFINGTON, HEAVEN RICHELLE 3615 §103 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Sep 14, 2023
18277951 Air Treatment Device BELIMO Holding AG TURNER, SONJI 1776 §103§112 Final Rejection 5d Pending Aug 18, 2023
18266172 Mower Knife Device Wepfer Technics AG RAILEY, JENNIFER A 3676 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 08, 2023
18029904 Device for Decoupling and for Vibration Control Aborra AG LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT 3679 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 01, 2023
18017055 LASER WELDING METHOD FOR JOINING A NON-SINTERED MATERIAL TO A SINTERED MATERIAL, COMPOSITE BODY, AND USE OF A LASER WELDING METHOD Eco Holding 1 GmbH WUNDERLICH, ERWIN J 3761 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 19, 2023

Managing Keller Schneider Patent-Und Markenanwalte's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month