Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Kudelski Group & Maier & Maier, Pllc

9 pending office actions • 2 clients • 9 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
7
Medium (78%)
1
Easy (11%)
1
Unknown (11%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only7 (78%)
§112 only1 (11%)
No statute on record1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
8
Information Tech
89% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
11% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALATA, YASSIN 1 66.5% +14.1%
GADOMSKI, STEFAN J 1 76.1% +7.3%
EKPO, NNENNA NGOZI 1 71.5% +20.4%
OCAK, ADIL 1 74.5% +18.3%
DAVIS, CHENEA 1 72.1% +16.1%
DANG, HUNG Q 1 68.4% +18.3%
JIMENEZ, JUSTIN ABEL 1 25.0% +85.7%
FIELDS, COURTNEY D 1 84.2% -4.6%
PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY 1 87.7% +3.3%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18259617 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROVIDING AN AUTHORIZATION TO ACCESS AN INTERACTIVE GOOD FIELDS, COURTNEY D 26d overdue
17298992 REMOTE ENFORCEMENT OF DEVICE MEMORY PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY 53d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18484662 METHOD FOR SECURING THE PROCESSING OF A DIGITAL ASSET, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS AND DEVICES JIMENEZ, JUSTIN ABEL 30d overdue

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18484662 METHOD FOR SECURING THE PROCESSING OF A DIGITAL ASSET, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS AND DEVICES JIMENEZ, JUSTIN ABEL 30d overdue
18914610 METHOD AND APPARATUS TO CREATE INTUITIVE FAVORITES FOR USERS OCAK, ADIL 11d overdue
18892796 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DISPLAYING CONTENT BASED ON LOCATIONAL ACTIVITY DAVIS, CHENEA 19d
18946244 CONTEXT DRIVEN CONTENT REWIND EKPO, NNENNA NGOZI 23d
19090983 CONTENT RECOMMENDATIONS USING PERSONAS ALATA, YASSIN 27d
18592782 METHOD FOR SYNCHRONIZING A PLURALITY OF MULTIMEDIA COMPONENTS, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT AND DEVICES DANG, HUNG Q 70d

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Kudelski 5
OpenTV, Inc. 4

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
24262
24851
24251
24211
24841
36971
24361
24921

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19090983 CONTENT RECOMMENDATIONS USING PERSONAS Opentv, Inc. ALATA, YASSIN 2426 §103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Mar 26, 2025
19020338 BITRATE AND PIPELINE PRESERVATION FOR CONTENT PRESENTATION Opentv, Inc. GADOMSKI, STEFAN J 2485 Other Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Jan 14, 2025
18946244 CONTEXT DRIVEN CONTENT REWIND Opentv, Inc. EKPO, NNENNA NGOZI 2425 §103 Final Rejection 23d Pending Nov 13, 2024
18914610 METHOD AND APPARATUS TO CREATE INTUITIVE FAVORITES FOR USERS Nagravision Sàrl OCAK, ADIL 2426 §103 Non-Final OA 11d overdue Pending Oct 14, 2024
18892796 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DISPLAYING CONTENT BASED ON LOCATIONAL ACTIVITY Opentv, Inc. DAVIS, CHENEA 2421 §112 Non-Final OA 19d Pending Sep 23, 2024
18592782 METHOD FOR SYNCHRONIZING A PLURALITY OF MULTIMEDIA COMPONENTS, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT AND DEVICES Nagravision Sarl DANG, HUNG Q 2484 §103 Non-Final OA 70d Pending Mar 01, 2024
18484662 METHOD FOR SECURING THE PROCESSING OF A DIGITAL ASSET, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS AND DEVICES Nagravision Sàrl JIMENEZ, JUSTIN ABEL 3697 §103 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Oct 11, 2023
18259617 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROVIDING AN AUTHORIZATION TO ACCESS AN INTERACTIVE GOOD Nagravision Sàrl FIELDS, COURTNEY D 2436 §103 Non-Final OA 26d overdue Pending Jun 28, 2023
17298992 REMOTE ENFORCEMENT OF DEVICE MEMORY Nagravision Sàrl PERUNGAVOOR, VENKATANARAY 2492 §103 Non-Final OA 53d Pending Jun 02, 2021

Managing Kudelski Group & Maier & Maier, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month