Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Law Offices Of Charles R. Cypher

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 3 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Law Offices of Charles R. Cypher manages a portfolio in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems with 364 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 88.38 percent for applications that reach a final resolution. Achieving these results involves an average of 2.53 office actions per allowance. Currently, the firm has 7 pending office actions to address.

The 364 career applications and 88.38 percent allowance rate reflect the firm's practice in its primary technology area. The 2.53 average office actions per allowance provides a benchmark for expected examiner interaction during the patent acquisition process. These figures offer a data-grounded view of the firm's historical performance and current workload for practitioners evaluating the firm's Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems experience.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=364 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.4%
Allowance Rate
n=364
+0.66σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=364
2.5
OAs to Allowance
n=251
-0.30σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=251
1178 days
Time to Allowance
n=251
+7.1pp
Interview Lift
n=364
39.8%
RCE Rate
n=364
1.5%
Appeal Rate
n=364

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
80.5%
§102 Overcome
n=87
78.3%
§103 Overcome
n=106
84.6%
§112 Overcome
n=123

Specialization & Scale

E04B, A01H, F16B
Top CPC Subclasses
50%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=364
0
Practitioners
n=364
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=364 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (17%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (17%)
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
17% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ADAMOS, THEODORE V 2 55.4% +44.6%
WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE 1 73.3% +30.4%
BUCKLE JR, JAMES J 1 65.5% +14.9%
CARTER, AARON W 1 84.9% +8.9%
DOERRLER, WILLIAM CHARLES 1 77.5% +14.2%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17910777 Methods for Selecting, Inspecting and Evaluating Brackets and Their Fastening Configurations in Construction CARTER, AARON W 19d
17700388 THRUST NUT DOERRLER, WILLIAM CHARLES 42d
18979582 Adjustable Post Cap WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE —
18211209 Anchor Bolt Locator BUCKLE JR, JAMES J —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17700388 THRUST NUT DOERRLER, WILLIAM CHARLES 42d
18979582 Adjustable Post Cap WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE —
18211209 Anchor Bolt Locator BUCKLE JR, JAMES J —
18206566 High Capacity Beam Hanger ADAMOS, THEODORE V —
17827928 Tension Tie ADAMOS, THEODORE V —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36353
36331
26611
39931

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18979582 Adjustable Post Cap Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. WALRAED-SULLIVAN, KYLE 3635 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2024
18211209 Anchor Bolt Locator Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. BUCKLE JR, JAMES J 3633 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 16, 2023
18206566 High Capacity Beam Hanger Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. ADAMOS, THEODORE V 3635 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 06, 2023
17910777 Methods for Selecting, Inspecting and Evaluating Brackets and Their Fastening Configurations in Construction Simpson Strong-Tie A/S CARTER, AARON W 2661 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA 19d Pending Sep 09, 2022
17827928 Tension Tie Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc. ADAMOS, THEODORE V 3635 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 30, 2022
17700388 THRUST NUT Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc. DOERRLER, WILLIAM CHARLES 3993 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 42d Pending Mar 21, 2022

Managing Law Offices Of Charles R. Cypher's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month