Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Law Offices Of Sandy Lipkin

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

13 pending office actions • 12 clients • 13 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 526 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Law Offices of Sandy Lipkin has 13 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 1286 career applications. The profile combines an active current workload with a substantial historical application record in the same technical area.

The resolved allowance rate is 93.13%, and the average is 1.0 office action per allowance. These figures separately describe resolved allowance outcomes and examination activity associated with allowed matters. Practitioners can use the combination for docket planning and historical context, while evaluating each pending application independently based on its claims, record, and outstanding issues.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1286 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

93.1%
Allowance Rate
n=1286
+0.27σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1286
1.0
OAs to Allowance
n=1017
-1.81σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1017
727 days
Time to Allowance
n=1017
-0.3pp
Interview Lift
n=1286
4.0%
RCE Rate
n=1286
1.4%
Appeal Rate
n=1286

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=16 (min 20)
64.7%
§102 Overcome
n=119
61.1%
§103 Overcome
n=162
79.8%
§112 Overcome
n=263

Specialization & Scale

A63B, A61H, B65D
Top CPC Subclasses
9%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1286
0
Practitioners
n=1286
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1286 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (46%)
3
Medium (23%)
4
Easy (31%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (8%)
§103 only2 (15%)
§102 only1 (8%)
§112 only4 (31%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (38%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
23% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
15% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
62% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
URBIEL GOLDNER, GARY D 1 73.4% +60.5%
KELLY, CATHERINE A 1 60.4% +27.5%
DO, ROWLAND 1 70.0% -5.3%
LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW 1 56.5% +22.9%
NORMAN, MARC E 1 84.0% +10.8%
JOHNSON, RYAN 1 83.7% +15.8%
DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H 1 24.2% +25.6%
NORRIS, CLAIRE A 1 66.0% +27.9%
MILLER, CAMERON KENNETH 1 81.6% +0.3%
ANDERSON, WILLIAM H 1 84.9% +18.4%

Quick Wins (4)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18900893 METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY STARTING UP OR SHUTTING DOWN VEHICLE-MOUNTED HUMIDIFIER NORMAN, MARC E —
18827796 CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TIMING APPARATUS JOHNSON, RYAN —
18679274 Cosmetic ceramic massage head formula and preparation technology MILLER, CAMERON KENNETH —
18670825 POWER CHIP EMBEDDED ENCAPSULATION MODULE ANDERSON, WILLIAM H —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18843021 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PLANT REPRODUCTIVE STRUCTURES THINNING DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H 100d overdue
19074375 MAGNETIC FASTENER AND STRAP DO, ROWLAND —
19031524 EXTENDED HOOK STRUCTURE FOR ROOF CROSSBAR LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW —
18760537 PROCESS FOR EFFICIENTLY RECLAIMING COPPER AND EDTA LIGANDS FROM Cu-EDTA-CONTAINING WASTEWATER NORRIS, CLAIRE A —
17908376 VERTICAL SOFT U-SHAPED OPENING AND CLOSING SEALED AIR-PRESSURE CHAMBER JANG, JAEICK —
17784385 BEVERAGE COMPOSITION O'HERN, BRENT T —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18843021 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PLANT REPRODUCTIVE STRUCTURES THINNING DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H 100d overdue
19193098 A protective fence with a pet door KELLY, CATHERINE A 26d
19151987 WEIGHT-ADJUSTABLE KETTLEBELL URBIEL GOLDNER, GARY D —
19031524 EXTENDED HOOK STRUCTURE FOR ROOF CROSSBAR LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW —
18900893 METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY STARTING UP OR SHUTTING DOWN VEHICLE-MOUNTED HUMIDIFIER NORMAN, MARC E —
18827796 CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TIMING APPARATUS JOHNSON, RYAN —
18760537 PROCESS FOR EFFICIENTLY RECLAIMING COPPER AND EDTA LIGANDS FROM Cu-EDTA-CONTAINING WASTEWATER NORRIS, CLAIRE A —
18670825 POWER CHIP EMBEDDED ENCAPSULATION MODULE ANDERSON, WILLIAM H —

Client Portfolio (12 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37841
36191
36771
37341
37631
28361
36241
17791
17311
28171

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19151987 WEIGHT-ADJUSTABLE KETTLEBELL Zhejiang Jingling Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. URBIEL GOLDNER, GARY D 3784 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 30, 2025
19193098 A protective fence with a pet door Zhongshan Chenbei Daily Necessities Co., Ltd. KELLY, CATHERINE A 3619 §103 Non-Final OA 26d Pending Apr 29, 2025
19074375 MAGNETIC FASTENER AND STRAP Zhejiang Xier Technology Co., Ltd. DO, ROWLAND 3677 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 08, 2025
19031524 EXTENDED HOOK STRUCTURE FOR ROOF CROSSBAR Guangzhou Issyzone Technology Co.,Limited LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW 3734 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 18, 2025
18900893 METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY STARTING UP OR SHUTTING DOWN VEHICLE-MOUNTED HUMIDIFIER Guangzhou Issyzone Technology Co.,Limited NORMAN, MARC E 3763 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 30, 2024
18827796 CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TIMING APPARATUS Bao Jie Electronics (Shenzhen) Limited JOHNSON, RYAN 2836 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 08, 2024
18843021 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PLANT REPRODUCTIVE STRUCTURES THINNING Mata Agritech, Ltd. DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H 3624 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 100d overdue Pending Aug 30, 2024
18760537 PROCESS FOR EFFICIENTLY RECLAIMING COPPER AND EDTA LIGANDS FROM Cu-EDTA-CONTAINING WASTEWATER Nanchang Hangkong University NORRIS, CLAIRE A 1779 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 01, 2024
18679274 Cosmetic ceramic massage head formula and preparation technology Guangzhou Candear Packing Products Co., Ltd. MILLER, CAMERON KENNETH 1731 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 30, 2024
18670825 POWER CHIP EMBEDDED ENCAPSULATION MODULE Raytrons Power Limited ANDERSON, WILLIAM H 2817 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 22, 2024
18498409 MODEL FOR TRAINING HIGH SIMULATION COLONOSCOPY Preclinic Medtech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. FRISBY, KESHA 3715 §102 Non-Final OA 8d Pending Oct 31, 2023
17908376 VERTICAL SOFT U-SHAPED OPENING AND CLOSING SEALED AIR-PRESSURE CHAMBER Shanghai Baobang Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. JANG, JAEICK 3785 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 31, 2022
17784385 BEVERAGE COMPOSITION Moxcha Ltd. O'HERN, BRENT T 1793 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 10, 2022

Managing Law Offices Of Sandy Lipkin's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Law Offices Of Sandy Lipkin's patent allowance rate?

93.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Law Offices Of Sandy Lipkin were allowed, across 1,286 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Law Offices Of Sandy Lipkin average before allowance?

1.00 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Law Offices Of Sandy Lipkin have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 12 clients, before 13 examiners in 13 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month