Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Lowry Blixseth Apc

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

12 pending office actions • 8 clients • 10 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

LOWRY BLIXSETH APC has managed 420 career applications in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals technology area. The firm currently has 7 pending office actions. This career volume of 420 applications shows a practice in this technical and regulated field.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 91.7 percent. It takes an average of 3.24 office actions per allowance to reach a successful outcome. This 3.24 average office actions per allowance indicates the typical prosecution cycle for its 420 career applications. The 91.7 percent allowance rate serves as a performance metric for its work in Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=420 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

91.7%
Allowance Rate
n=420
+0.60σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=420
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=265
-0.34σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=265
1076 days
Time to Allowance
n=265
+3.1pp
Interview Lift
n=420
22.5%
RCE Rate
n=420
4.4%
Appeal Rate
n=420

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
81.6%
§102 Overcome
n=98
76.2%
§103 Overcome
n=164
81.0%
§112 Overcome
n=121

Specialization & Scale

A61F, A47G, A61K
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=420
3
Practitioners
n=420
140.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=420

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (33%)
8
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (8%)
§103 only7 (58%)
Double-patenting + other1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
42% of docket
3
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KATCHEVES, BASIL S 2 72.2% +17.4%
TUROCY, DAVID P 2 46.9% +35.5%
WOODALL, NICHOLAS W 1 82.0% +13.3%
GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL 1 69.5% +40.5%
LEE, SHIN 1 66.7% +100.0%
HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN 1 56.5% +39.1%
COHEN, MICHAEL P 1 58.7% +27.5%
TRUONG, QUANGLONG N 1 78.8% +23.6%
COCHRAN, KARI LEE 1 100.0% +0.0%
EBBINGHAUS, BRIANA NOEL 1 61.6% +63.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19241099 UNIBODY ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WOODALL, NICHOLAS W —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18198240 UNIVERSAL TIBIAL INSERT WITH ENHANCED MEDIAL CONGRUENCE COCHRAN, KARI LEE 22d overdue
19014120 TRI-LAYER BED COVER GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL 23d
18869773 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING BEDSORE RISK HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN —
17267166 NANOPARTICLES FOR TRANSFECTION EBBINGHAUS, BRIANA NOEL —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18427813 SLAB SUPPORT KATCHEVES, BASIL S 49d overdue
19351176 SLAB SUPPORT KATCHEVES, BASIL S 23d overdue
18438087 USE OF BETA-ADRENERGIC INVERSE AGONISTS FOR SMOKING CESSATION COHEN, MICHAEL P 8d overdue
19014120 TRI-LAYER BED COVER GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL 23d
19241099 UNIBODY ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WOODALL, NICHOLAS W —
19201758 PROCESSES FOR PRODUCING ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS HAVING A SUBSURFACE LEVEL SILICON NITRIDE LAYER APPLIED VIA BOMBARDMENT TUROCY, DAVID P —
18983324 PROCESSES AND SYSTEMS FOR HEADPHONE TUNING LEE, SHIN —
18869773 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING BEDSORE RISK HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36332
37751
36731
16121
16241
37741
17181
16321

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19351176 SLAB SUPPORT Safeboard LLC KATCHEVES, BASIL S 3633 §103 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Oct 06, 2025
19241099 UNIBODY ORTHOPEDIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT Joint Development, Inc. WOODALL, NICHOLAS W 3775 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2025
19201758 PROCESSES FOR PRODUCING ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS HAVING A SUBSURFACE LEVEL SILICON NITRIDE LAYER APPLIED VIA BOMBARDMENT Joint Development, Inc. TUROCY, DAVID P §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 07, 2025
19014120 TRI-LAYER BED COVER Keeco, LLC GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL 3673 §102§103 Non-Final OA 23d Pending Jan 08, 2025
18983324 PROCESSES AND SYSTEMS FOR HEADPHONE TUNING Yellow Matter Entertainment, LLC LEE, SHIN §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18869773 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING BEDSORE RISK Neo Able Co., Ltd. HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18438087 USE OF BETA-ADRENERGIC INVERSE AGONISTS FOR SMOKING CESSATION Invion, Inc. COHEN, MICHAEL P 1612 §103 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Feb 09, 2024
18427813 SLAB SUPPORT Safeboard LLC KATCHEVES, BASIL S 3633 §103 Final Rejection 49d overdue Pending Jan 30, 2024
18281135 USE OF NADOLOL TO TREAT CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE BY BLOCKAGE OF THE ARRESTIN-2 PATHWAY Chronic Airway Therapeutics Limited TRUONG, QUANGLONG N 1624 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 08, 2023
18198240 UNIVERSAL TIBIAL INSERT WITH ENHANCED MEDIAL CONGRUENCE Joint Development, LLC COCHRAN, KARI LEE 3774 §102§103 Final Rejection 22d overdue Pending May 16, 2023
17713791 PROCESSES FOR PRODUCING ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS HAVING A SUBSURFACE LEVEL CERAMIC LAYER APPLIED VIA BOMBARDMENT Joint Development, LLC TUROCY, DAVID P 1718 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 05, 2022
17267166 NANOPARTICLES FOR TRANSFECTION Loxegen Holdings Pty Ltd. EBBINGHAUS, BRIANA NOEL 1632 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2021

Managing Lowry Blixseth Apc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month